journal article·2026-08

Mesh variational r-adaptivity for sharp modeling of brittle fracture

Gatien Dony, Nicolas Moës, Jean-François Remacle

International Journal of Fracture· Volume 250· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Purpose: Brittle fracture modeling is framed as a coupled evolution of spatial and material configurations. The displacement field between these configurations drives the fracture process and the crack path alters the geometry. This interplay has been expressed in the variational formalism of Francfort and Marigo. However, numerical models based on this formalism generally introduce a regularization to circumvent the need for geometry modification. Here, we propose to combine explicit sharp crack modeling with a variational formalism. Methods: Both mesh and displacement field are tuned to minimize the functional. Consequently, the crack path appears naturally. In this work, we first present the minimization of the fracture functional in a \((r)\)-adaptative scheme and the advantage it presents. Afterwards, we present a staggered optimization procedure to construct the spatial and material configurations of a body undergoing brittle fracture. Results: Afterwards, the method is demonstrated through several numerical examples. Namely, we recover theoretical behavior for a manufactured solution and present the crack path of single edge notch specimen. Conclusion: This method is a direct implementation of the variational formalism of fracture mechanics. Therefore, it provides a straightforward way to compute the energy release rate and crack path. Moreover, it does not require any regularization and the crack is directly represented in the geometry of the specimen. However, it is computationally expensive as the mesh needs to be optimized at each step of the loading.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Numerical methods in engineering · Elasticity and Material Modeling · Fatigue and fracture mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. Amestoy M, Leblond J (1992) Crack paths in plane situations—II. Detailed form of the expansion of the stress intensity factors. Int J Solids Struct 29(4):465–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7683(92)90210-K10.1016/0020-7683(92)90210-K ↗
2. Anderson T (2017) Fracture Mechanics: Fundamentals and Applications, 3rd edn. CRC Press, https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315370293, https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/978149872814010.1201/9781315370293 ↗
3. Angelillo M, Fortunato A, Babilio E et al (2010) Numerical experiments in 2D variational fracture. Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale 4(12):63–78. https://doi.org/10.3221/IGF-ESIS.12.07 (https://www.fracturae.com/index.php/fis/article/view/85)10.3221/IGF-ESIS.12.07 ↗
4. Angelillo M, Babilio E, Fortunato A (2012) Numerical solutions for crack growth based on the variational theory of fracture. Comput Mech 50(3):285–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-012-0755-110.1007/s00466-012-0755-1 ↗
5. Braun M (1997) Configurational forces induced by finite element discretization. 1997/01/01 46. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265365478_Configurational_forces_induced_by_finite_element_discretization10.3176/phys.math.1997.1/2.03 ↗
6. Chambolle A, Francfort G, Marigo JJ (2009) When and how do cracks propagate? J Mech Phys Solids 57(9):1614–1622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2009.05.009 (https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0022509609000726)10.1016/j.jmps.2009.05.009 ↗
7. Felippa CA (1976) Optimization of finite element grids by direct energy search. Appl Math Model 1(2):93–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/0307-904X(76)90005-610.1016/0307-904X(76)90005-6 ↗
8. Felippa CA (1977) Numerical experiments in finite element grid optimization by direct energy search. Appl Math Model 1(5):239–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/0307-904X(77)90015-410.1016/0307-904X(77)90015-4 ↗
9. Francfort G, Marigo JJ (1998) Revisiting brittle fracture as an energy minimization problem. J Mech Phys Solids 46(8):1319–1342. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5096(98)00034-910.1016/S0022-5096(98)00034-9 ↗
10. Materna D, Barthold FJ (2009) Goal-oriented r-adaptivity based on variational arguments in the physical and material spaces. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 198(41–44):3335–3351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2009.06.015 (https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0045782509002199)10.1016/j.cma.2009.06.015 ↗
11. McNeice GM, Marcal PV (1973) Optimization of Finite Element Grids Based on Minimum Potential Energy. Journal of Engineering for Industry 95(1):186–190. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3438097 (https://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/manufacturingscience/article/95/1/186/427486/Optimization-of-Finite-Element-Grids-Based-on)10.1115/1.3438097 ↗
12. Miehe C, Hofacker M, Welschinger F (2010) A phase field model for rate-independent crack propagation: Robust algorithmic implementation based on operator splits. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 199(45–48):2765–2778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2010.04.011 (https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0045782510001283)10.1016/j.cma.2010.04.011 ↗
13. Mosler J, Ortiz M (2006) On the numerical implementation of variational arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian (VALE) formulations. Int J Numer Meth Eng 67(9):1272–1289. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.162110.1002/nme.1621 ↗
14. Moës N, Chevaugeon N (2021) Lipschitz regularization for softening material models: the Lip-field approach. Comptes Rendus Mécanique 349(2):415–434. https://doi.org/10.5802/crmeca.9110.5802/crmeca.91 ↗
15. Moës N, Dolbow J, Belytschko T (1999) A finite element method for crack growth without remeshing. Int J Numer Meth Eng 46(1):131–150 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19990910)46:1<131::AID-NME726>3.0.CO;2-J10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19990910)46:1<131::AID-NME726>3.0.CO;2-J ↗
16. Scherer M, Denzer R, Steinmann P (2007) Energy-based r-adaptivity: a solution strategy and applications to fracture mechanics. Int J Fract 147(1–4):117–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-007-9143-910.1007/s10704-007-9143-9 ↗
17. Scherer M, Denzer R, Steinmann P (2008) On a solution strategy for energy-based mesh optimization in finite hyperelastostatics. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 197(6–8):609–622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2007.08.005 (https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0045782507003635)10.1016/j.cma.2007.08.005 ↗
18. Sussman T, Bathe K (1985) The gradient of the finite element variational indicator with respect to nodal and applications in fracture mechanics and mesh optimization. Int J Numer Meth Eng 21(4):763–774. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.162021041310.1002/nme.1620210413 ↗
19. Thoutireddy P, Ortiz M (2004) A variational r -adaption and shape-optimization method for finite-deformation elasticity. Int J Numer Meth Eng 61(1):1–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.105210.1002/nme.1052 ↗
20. Yagawa G, Sakai Y, Ando Y (1977) Analysis of a Rapidly Propagating Crack Using Finite Elements. In: Fast Fracture and Crack Arrest. ASTM International100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, p 109–122, https://doi.org/10.1520/STP27383S, https://dl.astm.org/stps/book/1041/chapter/147593/Analysis-of-a-Rapidly-Propagating-Crack-Using10.1520/STP27383S ↗
21. Zielonka MG (2006) Configurational Forces and Variational Mesh Adaption in Solid Dynamics. PhD thesis, California Institute of Technology, https://doi.org/10.7907/V6RB-FR94, https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechETD:etd-05112006-162905, medium: PDF Version Number: Final10.7907/V6RB-FR94 ↗
22. Zielonka MG, Ortiz M, Marsden JE (2008) Variational r -adaption in elastodynamics. Int J Numer Meth Eng 74(7):1162–1197. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.220510.1002/nme.2205 ↗