DataVXInternational Journal of FracturePaper
journal article·2026-05

Efficient SPH-PD FSI model for blast-induced crack initiation and propagation in rocks

Jin-lu Ba, Jun-xiang Wang, Xin-chen Liu, Gang Sun, Hai-yue Yu, Jie-ru Tian

International Journal of Fracture· Volume 250· Issue 2
Publisher page
Bibliographic record

Abstract

No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.

Source: Not provided · Quality: missing

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions · Rock Mechanics and Modeling · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. Blanc N, Frank X, Radjai F, Mayer-Laigle C, Delenne J-Y (2021) Breakage of flawed particles by peridynamic simulations. Comput Part Mech 8(5):1019–1031. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40571-021-00390-510.1007/s40571-021-00390-5 ↗
2. Campbell J, Vignjevic R, Libersky L (2000) A contact algorithm for smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 184(1):49–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7825(99)00442-910.1016/S0045-7825(99)00442-9 ↗
3. Cao C, Gu C, Wang C, Wang C, Xu P, Wang H (2024) A peridynamics-smoothed particle hydrodynamics coupling method for fluid-structure interaction. J Mar Sci Eng 12(11):1968. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse1211196810.3390/jmse12111968 ↗
4. Chen J-Y, Feng D-L, Deng S-X, Peng C, Lien F-S (2020) GPU-accelerated smoothed particle hydrodynamics modeling of jet formation and penetration capability of shaped charges. J Fluids Struct 99:103171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2020.10317110.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2020.103171 ↗
5. Dai Z, Xie J, Jiang M (2023) A coupled peridynamics–smoothed particle hydrodynamics model for fracture analysis of fluid–structure interactions. Ocean Eng 279:114582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.11458210.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.114582 ↗
6. Das S, Deb D, Pramanik R (2022) Meshfree numerical procedure of Biot’s consolidation: a coupled smoothed particle hydrodynamics and peridynamics model. Comput Part Mech 9(4):775–788. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40571-021-00443-910.1007/s40571-021-00443-9 ↗
7. Deb D, Pramanik R (2013) Failure process of brittle rock using smoothed particle hydrodynamics. J Eng Mech 139(11):1551–1565. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)em.1943-7889.000059210.1061/(asce)em.1943-7889.0000592 ↗
8. Deb D, Pramanik R (2015) Smoothed particle hydrodynamics modelling of blast-induced fracture processes in naturally jointed rock medium. Aust Inst Min Metall, pp 65–70
9. Dehghan Banadaki MM, Mohanty B (2012) Numerical simulation of stress wave induced fractures in rock. Int J Impact Eng 40–41:16–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2011.08.01010.1016/j.ijimpeng.2011.08.010 ↗
10. Del Castillo EM, Fávero Neto AH, Borja RI (2021) Fault propagation and surface rupture in geologic materials with a meshfree continuum method. Acta Geotech 16(8):2463–2486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-021-01233-610.1007/s11440-021-01233-6 ↗
11. Fraga Filho CAD, Ferreira RML, Aleixo R, Canelas R, Amaral S, Viseu T (2025) SPH modelling of mass detachment processes in overtopped dams. The limits of Froude similarity. Adv Water Resour 202:104987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2025.10498710.1016/j.advwatres.2025.104987 ↗
12. Gingold RA, Monaghan JJ (1977) Smoothed particle hydrodynamics: theory and application to non-spherical stars. Mon Not R Astron Soc 181(3):375–389. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/181.3.37510.1093/mnras/181.3.375 ↗
13. Han Z, Li D, Zhou T, Zhu Q, Ranjith PG (2020) Experimental study of stress wave propagation and energy characteristics across rock specimens containing cemented mortar joint with various thicknesses. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 131:104352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2020.10435210.1016/j.ijrmms.2020.104352 ↗
14. Hu R, Zhu ZM, Hu ZY, Kang JM (2013) Experimental study of crack propagation under explosive dynamic load. Zhongguo Yan Shi Li Xue Yu Gong Cheng Xue Bao 32(7):1476–1481
15. Huang X, Zhu B, Chen Y (2024) A coupled peridynamics–smoothed particle hydrodynamics model for fluid–structure interaction with large deformation. Phys Fluids 36(11):117131. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.023886810.1063/5.0238868 ↗
16. Jing C, Wang Y, Ju L, Wang Q, Xue Y, Li J (2024) A coupled smoothed particle hydrodynamics–peridynamics model for two-dimensional hydroelastic water entry. Phys Fluids 36(8):083330. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.022130010.1063/5.0221300 ↗
17. Li D, Han Z, Zhu Q, Zhang Y, Ranjith PG (2019) Stress wave propagation and dynamic behavior of red sandstone with single bonded planar joint at various angles. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 117:162–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2019.03.01110.1016/j.ijrmms.2019.03.011 ↗
18. Li L, Chen X, Gao C, Zhou Z, Li M, Zhang D, Chen J (2025) Peridynamics simulating of dynamics crack propagation in rock mass under blasting load. Simul Modell Pract Theory 140:103079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2025.10307910.1016/j.simpat.2025.103079 ↗
19. Liu MB, Liu GR, Lam KY (2002) Investigations into water mitigation using a meshless particle method. Shock Waves 12(3):181–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00193-002-0163-010.1007/s00193-002-0163-0 ↗
20. Liu MB, Liu GR, Lam KY, Zong Z (2003) Smoothed particle hydrodynamics for numerical simulation of underwater explosion. Comput Mech 30(2):106–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-002-0371-610.1007/s00466-002-0371-6 ↗
21. Liu R, Yan J, Li S (2019) Modeling and simulation of ice–water interactions by coupling peridynamics with updated Lagrangian particle hydrodynamics. Comput Part Mech 7(2):241–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40571-019-00268-710.1007/s40571-019-00268-7 ↗
22. Liu Z, Bie Y, Cui Z, Cui X (2020) Ordinary state-based peridynamics for nonlinear hardening plastic materials’ deformation and its fracture process. Eng Fract Mech 223:106782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.10678210.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.106782 ↗
23. Long T, Yang P, Liu M (2020) A novel coupling approach of smoothed finite element method with SPH for thermal fluid structure interaction problems. Int J Mech Sci 174:105558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.10555810.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.105558 ↗
24. Lu C-P, Dou L-M, Wu X-R, Xie Y-S (2010) Case study of blast-induced shock wave propagation in coal and rock. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 47(6):1046–1054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2010.06.00910.1016/j.ijrmms.2010.06.009 ↗
25. Monaghan JJ (1994) Simulating free surface flows with SPH. J Comput Phys 110(2):399–406. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph.1994.103410.1006/jcph.1994.1034 ↗
26. Niu Y, Zhou X, Chen J (2024) Numerical study on dynamic cracking characteristic and mechanism of quasi-brittle materials under impulsive loading. Theor Appl Fract Mech 131:104356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2024.10435610.1016/j.tafmec.2024.104356 ↗
27. Panchadhara R, Gordon PA, Parks ML (2017) Modeling propellant-based stimulation of a borehole with peridynamics. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 93:330–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2017.02.00610.1016/j.ijrmms.2017.02.006 ↗
28. Pramanik R, Deb D (2014) Implementation of smoothed particle hydrodynamics for detonation of explosive with application to rock fragmentation. Rock Mech Rock Eng 48(4):1683–1698. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-014-0657-y10.1007/s00603-014-0657-y ↗
29. Pramanik R, Deb D (2014) SPH procedures for modeling multiple intersecting discontinuities in geomaterial. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 39(4):343–367. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.231110.1002/nag.2311 ↗
30. Pramanik R, Deb D (2015) Numerical simulation of rock blasting phenomena in small scale using SPH. In: ISRM congress 2015 proceedings—international symposium on rock mechanics, p 391
31. Shen W, Shi G, Wang Y, Bai J, Zhang R, Wang X (2021) Tomography of the dynamic stress coefficient for stress wave prediction in sedimentary rock layer under the mining additional stress. Int J Min Sci Technol 31(4):653–663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmst.2021.04.00310.1016/j.ijmst.2021.04.003 ↗
32. Shwetank K, Deb D, Pramanik R (2023) Coupled meshfree (SPH) and grid based (FDM) procedures for modeling fluid flow through deformable porous media. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 170:105494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2023.10549410.1016/j.ijrmms.2023.105494 ↗
33. Silling SA (2000) Reformulation of elasticity theory for discontinuities and long-range forces. J Mech Phys Solids 48(1):175–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5096(99)00029-010.1016/S0022-5096(99)00029-0 ↗
34. Silling SA, Epton M, Weckner O, Xu J, Askari E (2007) Peridynamic states and constitutive modeling. J Elast 88(2):151–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10659-007-9125-110.1007/s10659-007-9125-1 ↗
35. Sun G, Wang J, Tang S, Zhang Z, Guo L (2024) A dynamic damage constitutive model and three-dimensional internal crack propagation of rock-like materials in bond-based peridynamic. Theor Appl Fract Mech 130:104320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2024.10432010.1016/j.tafmec.2024.104320 ↗
36. Sun G, Wang J, Tian J, Han R, Ba J, Wang H, Yu H (2025) Dynamic mechanical behaviors and cracking mechanisms of non-straight flaws in tuff. Int J Mech Sci 295:110303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2025.11030310.1016/j.ijmecsci.2025.110303 ↗
37. Wang J, Sun G, Tang S, Wu J, Yu H (2025) A dynamic damage constitutive model and crack propagation characteristics of heterogeneous rocks in uni-bond dual-parameter peridynamics. Comput Geotech 178:106940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2024.10694010.1016/j.compgeo.2024.106940 ↗
38. Weibull W (1951) A statistical distribution function of wide applicability. J Appl Mech 18:293–297. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.401033710.1115/1.4010337 ↗
39. Wu D, Bai X, Zan Y, Wang A, Li Z (2025) Analysis of sea spray at various wave-course angles based on a speed-component towed SPH model. Ocean Eng 322:120479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2025.12047910.1016/j.oceaneng.2025.120479 ↗
40. Wu Q, Zhang C, Ni B-Y, Yu Z, Yang D, Xue Y (2024) Numerical study on the damage of floating ice by high-pressure bubble loads. Eng Anal Boundary Elem 169:106041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enganabound.2024.10604110.1016/j.enganabound.2024.106041 ↗
41. Xu X, Ouyang J, Yang B, Liu Z (2013) SPH simulations of three-dimensional non-Newtonian free surface flows. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 256:101–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2012.12.01710.1016/j.cma.2012.12.017 ↗
42. Xu X, Tian L, Sun Y, Kang J (2025) 2D and 3D SPH simulations of transient non-isothermal viscoelastic injection molding process with complex-shaped cavities. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech 336:105377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnnfm.2024.10537710.1016/j.jnnfm.2024.105377 ↗
43. Xue Y, Zhang C, Wu Q, Tan H, Xu X, Ni B-Y (2024) Numerical study on ice breaking by a free-rising light sphere. Ocean Eng 309:118529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.11852910.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.118529 ↗
44. Yang S, Gu X, Xia X, Zhang Q (2022) Explosion damage analysis of concrete structure with bond-associated non-ordinary state-based peridynamics. Eng Comput 39(1):607–624. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-022-01620-x10.1007/s00366-022-01620-x ↗
45. Yao X, Huang D (2022) Coupled PD-SPH modeling for fluid-structure interaction problems with large deformation and fracturing. Comput Struct 270:106847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2022.10684710.1016/j.compstruc.2022.106847 ↗
46. Zhang AM, Yang WS, Yao XL (2012) Numerical simulation of underwater contact explosion. Appl Ocean Res 34:10–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2011.07.00910.1016/j.apor.2011.07.009 ↗