Investigation of microdamage and failure of metastable austenitic steel AISI 321 by changes in elastic moduli and content of strain-induced martensite
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels · Surface Treatment and Residual Stress · Microstructure and mechanical properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. ASTM International (2005) ASTM E494–05 (2005) Standard practice for measuring ultrasonic velocity in materials, p 13
2. Bayerlein M, Christ HJ, Mughrabi H (1989) Plasticity-induced martensitic transformation during cyclic deformation of AISI 304L stainless steel. Mater Sci Eng A 114:11–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-5093(89)90871-X10.1016/0921-5093(89)90871-X ↗
3. Betekhtin VI, Petrov AI, Burenkov YuA, Kartashov AM, Azhimuratov YuN, Kadomtsev AG, Sklenichka V (1989) Influence of porosity on the effective modulus of elasticity of metals. Phys Met Metallogr 67(3):138–143
4. Bowkett M, Keown SR, Harries DR (1982) Quench- and deformation-induced structure in two austenitic stainless steels. Met Sci 16:499–517. https://doi.org/10.1179/03063458279042708210.1179/030634582790427082 ↗
5. Collins JA (1993) Failure of materials in mechanical design: Analysis, prediction, prevention, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York
6. Ge J, Yi Sun Y, Zhou S (2015) Fatigue life estimation under multiaxial random loading by means of the equivalent Lemaitre stress and multiaxial S-N curve methods. Int J Fatigue 79:65–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.04.02210.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.04.022 ↗
7. Hecker SS, Stout MG, Staudhammer KP, Smith JL (1982) Effects of strain state and strain rate on deformation-induced transformation in 304 stainless steel: Part I. Magnetic measurements and mechanical behavior. Metall Mater Trans A 13:619–626. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf0264442710.1007/bf02644427 ↗
8. Hennessy D, Steckel G, Altstetter C (1976) Phase transformation of stainless steel during fatigue. Metall Mater Trans A 7:415–424. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0264283810.1007/BF02642838 ↗
9. Kachanov M, Sevostianov I (2018) Micromechanics of materials, with applications. Spring. Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76204-310.1007/978-3-319-76204-3 ↗
10. Kachanov ML, Mishakin VV, Pronina UG (2021) On low-cycle fatigue of austenitic steel. Part II: Extraction of information on microcrack density from a combination of the acoustic and eddy current data. Int J Eng Sci 169:103569. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJENGSCI.2021.10356910.1016/J.IJENGSCI.2021.103569 ↗
11. Kaleta J, Zietek G (1998) Representation of cyclic properties of austenitic steels with plasticity-induced martensitic transformation. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 21:955–964. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1460-2695.1998.00086.x10.1046/j.1460-2695.1998.00086.x ↗
12. Kaleva O, Orelma H, Petukhov D (2021) Parameter estimation of a high-cycle fatigue model combining the Ottosen-Stenström-Ristinmaa approach and Lemaitre-Chaboche damage rule. Int J Fatigue 147:106153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.10615310.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.106153 ↗
13. Khan SH, Ali F, Nusair Khan A, Iqbal MA (2008) Eddy current detection of changes in stainless steel after cold reduction. Comput Mater Sci 43(4):623–628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2008.01.03410.1016/j.commatsci.2008.01.034 ↗
14. Kim CS (2018) Assessment of the low-cycle strain-induced martensite transformation in AISI 316 stainless steel by magnetic and acoustic nondestructive methods. Strength Mater 50:41–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11223-018-9940-610.1007/s11223-018-9940-6 ↗
15. Kinoshita K, Nakazaki R, Matsumoto E (2014) Variation of the magnetic properties of the martensite phase of SUS304 steel due to tensile deformation. Int J Appl Electromagn Mech 45(1–4):45–52. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAE-141811. ((2014))10.3233/JAE-141811 ↗
16. Krupp U, West C, Christ HJ (2008) Deformation-induced martensite formation during cyclic deformation of metastable austenitic steel: Influence of temperature and carbon content. Mater Sci Eng A 481(1):713–717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2006.12.21110.1016/j.msea.2006.12.211 ↗
17. Lemaitre J, Chaboche JL (1994) Mechanics of solid materials. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
18. Marco SM, Starkey WL (1954) A concept of fatigue damage. J Fluids Eng 76:627–632
19. Mishakin V, Gonchar A, Kurashkin K, Klyushnikov V, Kachanov M (2021) On low-cycle fatigue of austenitic steel. Part I: Changes of Poisson’s ratio and elastic anisotropy. Int J Eng Sci 168:103567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijengsci.2021.10356710.1016/j.ijengsci.2021.103567 ↗
20. Mishakin VV, Sergeeva OA, Klyushnikov VA (2024) Relationship between the elastic characteristics of metastable austenitic steels and microdamage under fatigue. Tech Phys 69(1):56–61. https://doi.org/10.61011/JTF.2024.01.56902.183-2310.61011/JTF.2024.01.56902.183-23 ↗
21. Pronina YG, Narykova M, Kachanov M (2025) Relating stiffness changes in porous materials to the evolution of pore space. Mech Mater 202:105236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2024.10523610.1016/j.mechmat.2024.105236 ↗
22. Qin Z, Xia Y (2020) Role of strain-induced martensitic phase transformation in mechanical response of 304L steel at different strain-rates and temperatures. J Mater Process Technol 280:116613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2020.11661310.1016/j.jmatprotec.2020.116613 ↗
23. Sergeeva OA, Mishakin VV, Klyushnikov VA (2024) Study of the relationship between fatigue characteristics and elastic modulus of metastable austenitic steels. Probl Strength Plast 86(1):94–105. https://doi.org/10.32326/1814-9146-2024-86-1-94-10510.32326/1814-9146-2024-86-1-94-105 ↗
24. Silva VMA, Camerini CG, Pardal JM, de Blás JG, Pereira GR (2018) Eddy current characterization of cold-worked AISI 321 stainless steel. J Mater Res Technol 7:395–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2018.07.00210.1016/j.jmrt.2018.07.002 ↗
25. Talonen J, Nenonen P, Pape G, Hanninen H (2005) Effect of strain rate on the strain-induced γ→α’ martensite transformation and mechanical properties of austenitic stainless steels. Metall Mater Trans A 36:421–432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-005-0313-y10.1007/s11661-005-0313-y ↗
26. Truell R, Elbaum C, Chick BB (1969) Ultrasonic methods in solid state. Academic press, New York
27. Tumanov AV (2023) Modification of the Lemaitre damage model by a local multiaxial stress state function. Phys Mesomech 26(5):573–580. https://doi.org/10.1134/S102995992305009010.1134/S1029959923050090 ↗
28. Vinogradov A, Lazarev A, Linderov M, Weidner A, Biermann H (2013) Kinetics of deformation processes in high-alloyed cast transformation-induced plasticity twinning-induced plasticity steels determined by acoustic emission and scanning electron microscopy: influence of austenite stability on deformation mechanisms. Acta Mater 61(7):2434–2449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2013.01.01610.1016/j.actamat.2013.01.016 ↗
29. Voigt W (1889) Uber die beziehung zwischen den beiden elastizitatskonstanten isotroper korper. Ann Phys 38:573–58710.1002/andp.18892741206 ↗
30. Xie S, Chen Z, Chen HE, Sato S, Uchimoto T, Takagi T, Yoshida Y (2014) Evaluation of plastic deformation and characterization of electromagnetic properties using pulsed eddy current testing method. Int J Appl Electromagn Mech 45(1–4):755–761. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAE-14190310.3233/JAE-141903 ↗
31. Zhang J, Li S, Xuan F-Z, Yang F (2015) Effect of plastic deformation on nonlinear ultrasonic response of austenitic stainless steel. Mater Sci Eng A 622:146–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2014.10.08210.1016/j.msea.2014.10.082 ↗