The Virtual Element Method for dynamic crack analysis
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The Virtual Element Method (VEM) constitutes a generalization of the standard Finite Element Method (FEM), allowing for substantially more flexibility in the mesh design. This feature makes the method particularly suitable for problems with evolving discontinuities and singularities, and thus for crack problems. Dynamic crack analyses oftentimes incorporate impact loads, requiring sophisticated procedures of time integration, which are known from the FEM. Furthermore, the crack tip loading quantities are highly dependent on structural damping, while algorithmic damping is inevitable for numerical stability. Established approaches to quantify crack tip loading are basically applicable within the VEM framework, however, have to be adapted to characteristics like the absence of shape functions within elements. The Displacement Interpretation Method (DIM), the Modified Crack Closure Integral and the J -integral are elaborated in this context, restricting analyses to linear elastic fracture mechanics and stationary cracks. The accuracy of the approaches is verified comparing results of analytical and other numerical calculations. Numerical studies reveal the impact of physical parameters associated with structural damping and load rate, as well as of numerical factors such as approximation order, contour of the J -integral, extrapolation domain of the DIM and algorithmic damping. After all, the VEM appears to be a highly suitable numerical approach for dynamic fracture mechanics with a view to future crack growth simulations.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Numerical methods in engineering · Contact Mechanics and Variational Inequalities · Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (67)
Show source-provided references
1. Ahmad B, Alsaedi A, Brezzi F, Marini L, Russo A (2013) Equivalent projectors for virtual element methods. Comput Math Appl 66(3):376–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2013.05.01510.1016/j.camwa.2013.05.015 ↗
2. Aldakheel F, Hudobivnik B, Wriggers P (2019) Virtual element formulation for phase-field modeling of ductile fracture. Int J Mult Comp Eng 17(2):181–200. https://doi.org/10.1615/IntJMultCompEng.201802680410.1615/IntJMultCompEng.2018026804 ↗
3. Aliabadi MH (1997) Boundary Element Formulations in Fracture Mechanics. Appl Mech Rev 50(2):83–96. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.310169010.1115/1.3101690 ↗
4. Antonietti PF (2022) The virtual element method and its applications, vol 31 in SEMA SIMAI Springer Series, 1st ed. Springer International Publishing AG, Cham10.1007/978-3-030-95319-5 ↗
5. Antonietti PF, Manzini G, Mazzieri I, Mourad HM, Verani M (2021) The arbitrary-order virtual element method for linear elastodynamics models: convergence, stability and dispersion-dissipation analysis. Numer Meth Eng 122(4):934–971. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.656910.1002/nme.6569 ↗
6. Artioli E, Beirão Da Veiga L, Lovadina C, Sacco E (2017) Arbitrary order 2D virtual elements for polygonal meshes: part I, elastic problem. Comput Mech 60(3):355–377 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-017-1404-510.1007/s00466-017-1404-5 ↗
7. Atluri SN (1982) Path-independent integrals in finite elasticity and inelasticity, with body forces, inertia, and arbitrary crack-face conditions. Eng Fract Mech 16(3):341–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7944(82)90113-810.1016/0013-7944(82)90113-8 ↗
8. Bathe KJ (1996) Finite element procedures. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs
9. Beirão da Veiga L, Brezzi F, Cangiani A, Manzini G, Marini LD, Russo A (2013) Basic principles of virtual element methods. Math Models Methods Appl Sci 23(01):199–214. https://doi.org/10.1142/S021820251250049210.1142/S0218202512500492 ↗
10. Beirão da Veiga L, Brezzi F, Marini LD (2013) Virtual elements for linear elasticity problems. SIAM J Numer Anal 51(2):794–812. https://doi.org/10.1137/12087474610.1137/120874746 ↗
11. Beirão da Veiga L, Brezzi F, Marini LD, Russo A (2014) The Hitchhiker’s guide to the virtual element method. Math Models Methods Appl Sci 24(08):1541–1573. https://doi.org/10.1142/S021820251440003X10.1142/S021820251440003X ↗
12. Beirão da Veiga L, Brezzi F, Marini LD, Russo A (2023) The virtual element method. Acta Numer 32:123–202. https://doi.org/10.1017/S096249292200009510.1017/S0962492922000095 ↗
13. Belytschko T, Black T (1999) Elastic crack growth in finite elements with minimal remeshing. Int J Numer Meth Eng 45(5):601–62010.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19990620)45:5<601::AID-NME598>3.0.CO;2-S ↗
14. Buchholz FG (1984) Improved formulae for the finite element calculation of the strain energy release rate by modified crack closure integral method. Accuracy, reliability and training in fem technology. Robinson and Associates, Dorset, pp 650–659
15. Chen YM (1975) Numerical computation of dynamic stress intensity factors by a Lagrangian finite-difference method (the HEMP code). Eng Fract Mech 7:653–66010.1016/0013-7944(75)90021-1 ↗
16. Chen Y, Sun D, Perego U, Li Q (2025) Brittle crack propagation simulation based on the Virtual Element Method and J_k -integral fracture criterion. Eng Fract Mech 314:110684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2024.11068410.1016/j.engfracmech.2024.110684 ↗
17. Cherepanov G (1967) Rasprostranenie trechin v sploshnoi srede (About crack advance in the continuum). Prikladnaja Matematika i Mekhanica 31:478–488
18. Chin EB, Sukumar N (2021) Scaled boundary cubature scheme for numerical integration over planar regions with affine and curved boundaries. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 380:113796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2021.11379610.1016/j.cma.2021.113796 ↗
19. Chirino F, Dominguez J (1989) Dynamic analysis of cracks using boundary element method. Eng Fract Mech 34(5–6):1051–1061. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7944(89)90266-X10.1016/0013-7944(89)90266-X ↗
20. Choi H, Chi H, Park K (2023) Virtual element method for mixed-mode cohesive fracture simulation with element split and domain integral. Int J Fract 240(1):51–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-022-00675-710.1007/s10704-022-00675-7 ↗
21. Chung J, Hulbert GM (1993) A time integration algorithm for structural dynamics with improved numerical dissipation: the generalized-alpha-method. J Appl Mech 60(2):371–375. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.290080310.1115/1.2900803 ↗
22. Cihan M, Hudobivnik B, Aldakheel F, Wriggers P (2021) Virtual element formulation for finite strain elastodynamics. Comput Model Eng Sci 129(3):1151–1180
23. Dassi F (2025) Vem++, a C++ library to handle and play with the virtual element method. Numer Algor. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11075-025-02059-z10.1007/s11075-025-02059-z ↗
24. Enderlein M, Ricoeur A, Kuna M (2003) Comparison of finite element techniques for 2D and 3D crack analysis under impact loading. Int J Solids Struct 40(13–14):3425–3437. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7683(03)00117-310.1016/S0020-7683(03)00117-3 ↗
25. Eshelby J (1951) The force on an elastic singularity. Phil Trans R Soc Lond A 244(877):87–112. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1951.001610.1098/rsta.1951.0016 ↗
26. Fedelinski P, Aliabadi M, Rooke D (1993) The dual boundary element method in dynamic fracture mechanics. Eng Anal Boundary Elem 12(3):203–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/0955-7997(93)90016-E10.1016/0955-7997(93)90016-E ↗
27. Fedelinski P, Aliabadi MH, Rooke DP (1997) The time-domain DBEM for rapidly growing cracks. Int J Numer Meth Eng 40(9):1555–157210.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19970515)40:9<1555::AID-NME126>3.0.CO;2-B ↗
28. Freund LB (1990) Dynamic fracture mechanics, 1st ed. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511546761. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/9780511546761/type/book10.1017/CBO9780511546761 ↗
29. Gross D, Seelig T (2018) Fracture mechanics: with an introduction to micromechanics, 3rd ed. Mechanical Engineering Series, Springer International Publishing : Imprint: Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71090-710.1007/978-3-319-71090-7 ↗
30. Gürses E, Miehe C (2009) A computational framework of three-dimensional configurational-force-driven brittle crack propagation. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 198(15–16):1413–1428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2008.12.02810.1016/j.cma.2008.12.028 ↗
31. Hilber HM, Hughes TJR, Taylor RL (1977) Improved numerical dissipation for time integration algorithms in structural dynamics. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 5(3):283–292. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.429005030610.1002/eqe.4290050306 ↗
32. Hughes TJR (ed) (2000) The finite element method: linear static and dynamic finite element analysis. Dover Publications, Mineola
33. Huo S, Liu G, Zhang J, Song C (2020) A smoothed finite element method for octree-based polyhedral meshes with large number of hanging nodes and irregular elements. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 359:112646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2019.11264610.1016/j.cma.2019.112646 ↗
34. Hussein A, Aldakheel F, Hudobivnik B, Wriggers P, Guidault PA, Allix O (2019) A computational framework for brittle crack-propagation based on efficient virtual element method. Finite Elem Anal Des 159:15–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2019.03.00110.1016/j.finel.2019.03.001 ↗
35. Jih C, Sun C (1990) Evaluation of a finite element based crack-closure method for calculating static and dynamic strain energy release rates. Eng Fract Mech 37(2):313–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7944(90)90043-G10.1016/0013-7944(90)90043-G ↗
36. Kuna M (2013) Finite elements in fracture mechanics: theory—numerics—applications. Solid mechanics and its applications. Springer, Netherlands, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6680-810.1007/978-94-007-6680-8 ↗
37. Kus P, Solin P, Andrs D (2014) Arbitrary-level hanging nodes for adaptive h p -FEM approximations in 3D. J Comput Appl Math 270:121–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2014.02.01010.1016/j.cam.2014.02.010 ↗
38. Leng Y, Svolos L, Boureima I, Manzini G, Plohr JN, Mourad HM (2025) Arbitrary order virtual element methods for high-order phase-field modeling of dynamic fracture. Numer Meth Eng 126(1):e7605. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.760510.1002/nme.7605 ↗
39. Liguori F, Madeo A, Marfia S, Garcea G, Sacco E (2024) A stabilization-free hybrid virtual element formulation for the accurate analysis of 2D elasto-plastic problems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 431:117281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2024.11728110.1016/j.cma.2024.117281 ↗
40. Marfia S, Monaldo E, Sacco E (2022) Cohesive fracture evolution within virtual element method. Eng Fract Mech 269:108464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.10846410.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.108464 ↗
41. Mengolini M, Benedetto MF, Aragón AM (2019) An engineering perspective to the virtual element method and its interplay with the standard finite element method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 350:995–1023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2019.02.04310.1016/j.cma.2019.02.043 ↗
42. Moës N, Dolbow J, Belytschko T (1999) A finite element method for crack growth without remeshing. Int J Numer Meth Engng 46(1):131–15010.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19990910)46:1<131::AID-NME726>3.0.CO;2-J ↗
43. Nakamura T, Shih CF, Freund LB (1985) Computational methods based on an energy integral in dynamic fracture. Int J Fract 27(3–4):229–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0001797010.1007/BF00017970 ↗
44. Newmark NM (1959) A method of computation for structural dynamics. J Engrg Mech Div 85(3):67–94. https://doi.org/10.1061/JMCEA3.000009810.1061/JMCEA3.0000098 ↗
45. Nguyen-Thanh VM, Zhuang X, Nguyen-Xuan H, Rabczuk T, Wriggers P (2018) A virtual element method for 2D linear elastic fracture analysis. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 340:366–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2018.05.02110.1016/j.cma.2018.05.021 ↗
46. Nishioka T, Atluri S (1983) A numerical study of the use of path independent integrals in elasto-dynamic crack propagation. Eng Fract Mech 18(1):23–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7944(83)90092-910.1016/0013-7944(83)90092-9 ↗
47. Nishioka T, Atluri S (1983) Path-independent integrals, energy release rates, and general solutions of near-tip fields in mixed-mode dynamic fracture mechanics. Eng Fract Mech 18(1):1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7944(83)90091-710.1016/0013-7944(83)90091-7 ↗
48. Park K, Chi H, Paulino GH (2019) On nonconvex meshes for elastodynamics using virtual element methods with explicit time integration. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 356:669–68410.1016/j.cma.2019.06.031 ↗
49. Perl M, Shmuely M, Peretz D (1982) An improved dynamic crack propagation simulation in the SEN specimen by the SMF2D code. Int J Fract 19(1):17–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0001248910.1007/BF00012489 ↗
50. Rashid M (1998) The arbitrary local mesh replacement method: an alternative to remeshing for crack propagation analysis. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 154(1–2):133–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7825(97)00068-610.1016/S0045-7825(97)00068-6 ↗
51. Ravi-Chandar K (ed) (2004) Dynamic fracture. Elsevier, Amsterdam
52. Rice JR (1968) A path independent integral and the approximate analysis of strain concentration by notches and cracks. J Appl Mech 35(2):379–386. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.360120610.1115/1.3601206 ↗
53. Shmuely M, Alterman ZS (1973) Crack propagation analysis by finite differences. J Appl Mech 40(4):902–908. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.342318510.1115/1.3423185 ↗
54. Sinha AK, Pamnani G (2025) Applications of XFEM in fracture analysis: a review. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Civ Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-025-01955-710.1007/s40996-025-01955-7 ↗
55. Slaughter WS (2002) The linearized theory of elasticity. Birkhäuser Boston, Boston. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0093-210.1007/978-1-4612-0093-2 ↗
56. Song C, Wolf JP (1996) Consistent infinitesimal finite-element cell method: three-dimensional vector wave equation. Int J Numer Meth Engng 39(13):2189–220810.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19960715)39:13<2189::AID-NME950>3.0.CO;2-P ↗
57. Song C, Wolf JP (1997) The scaled boundary finite-element method-alias consistent infinitesimal finite-element cell method-for elastodynamics. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 147(3–4):329–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7825(97)00021-210.1016/S0045-7825(97)00021-2 ↗
58. Sukumar N, Tupek MR (2022) Virtual elements on agglomerated finite elements to increase the critical time step in elastodynamic simulations. Numer Meth Eng 123(19):4702–4725. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.705210.1002/nme.7052 ↗
59. Talischi C, Paulino GH, Pereira A, Menezes IFM (2012) PolyMesher: a general-purpose mesh generator for polygonal elements written in Matlab. Struct Multidisc Optim 45(3):309–328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-011-0706-z10.1007/s00158-011-0706-z ↗
60. Wen PH, Aliabadi MH, Rooke DP (1996) Application of the weight function method to two-dimensional elastodynamic fracture mechanics. Int J Fract 76(3):193–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0004828610.1007/BF00048286 ↗
61. Wood WL, Bossak M, Zienkiewicz OC (1980) An alpha modification of Newmark’s method. Numer Meth Eng 15(10):1562–1566. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.162015101110.1002/nme.1620151011 ↗
62. Wriggers P, Hudobivnik B (2017) A low order virtual element formulation for finite elasto-plastic deformations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 327:459–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2017.08.05310.1016/j.cma.2017.08.053 ↗
63. Wriggers P, Aldakheel F, Hudobivnik B (2024) Virtual element methods in engineering sciences. Springer International Publishing, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39255-910.1007/978-3-031-39255-9 ↗
64. Xu BB, Peng F, Junker P, Wriggers P (2025) Virtual element method with non-matching and adaptive meshes for phase field fracture. Comput Mech. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-025-02665-710.1007/s00466-025-02665-7 ↗
65. Yang Z (2006) Application of scaled boundary finite element method in static and dynamic fracture problems. Acta Mech Mech Sinica 22(3):243–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10409-006-0110-x10.1007/s10409-006-0110-x ↗
66. Zhang P, Du C, Zhao W, Sun L (2021) Dynamic crack face contact and propagation simulation based on the scaled boundary finite element method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 385:114044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2021.11404410.1016/j.cma.2021.114044 ↗
67. Zienkiewicz OC, Taylor RL (2000) The finite element method, 5th edn. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, Boston