Damage-mechanics insights into the relationship between upper-shelf Charpy testing and J-integral testing considering varying tensile test properties
Source abstract
Abstract
Requirements on the yield-to-tensile strength ratio $$\sigma _y/\sigma _u$$ , fracture elongation A and the Charpy energy $$C_v$$ are used together as part of an indirect method of ensuring sufficient ductility at localised areas of stress and strain concentration in the design of steel structures. Recent studies have found that these indirect requirements could be inadequate in certain situations involving cracks or manufacturing defects. Furthermore, requirements on the $$\sigma _y/\sigma _u$$ which are enforced regardless of the structural context and other material properties may unnecessarily constrain the use of steels which nonetheless have high strength, fracture toughness and ductility. In contrast to the $$\sigma _y/\sigma _u$$ , A, and $$C_v$$ , a more direct measurement of a structure’s ability to resist fracture is given by fracture toughness testing, such as J-integral testing, but this is less frequently used, because these tests are significantly costlier than tension and Charpy tests. More often, Charpy tests are performed and correlations between upper-shelf $$C_v$$ and J values are used to estimate the fracture toughness of the material. However, the existing correlations are predominantly based on empirical findings and have not systematically accounted for the effect of variations in the $$\sigma _y/\sigma _u$$ , which has been shown in recent studies to affect the fracture toughness. Using a previously validated coupled damage-mechanics model with rate- and temperature-dependent plasticity and damage softening, this paper investigates the correlation between $$C_v$$ and $$J_Q$$ (the critical J) numerically, including how it is affected by other material certificate properties such as the $$\sigma _y/\sigma _u$$ and A. First, a correlation based on regression between the damage parameters and the mechanical properties from mill test certificates is found by calibrating the damage parameters for a large database of these steels. Then, the correlation between $$C_v$$ and $$J_Q$$ is assessed by simulating the single-edge-notch bending test for a range of varying mill test certificate properties, taking into account how the damage parameters vary with these mechanical properties. The results are analysed to give better insight into how the notch toughness correlates to the fracture toughness, taking the $$\sigma _y/\sigma _u$$ and A into account. It is seen that although varying $$\sigma _y/\sigma _u$$ and A has some effect on how the total notch energy $$C_v$$ is correlated to $$J_Q$$ , it does not reflect a significant effect on the ductile fracture initiation toughness but is rather associated with the fact that the $$C_v$$ includes a significant portion of energy for stable ductile propagation and fracture occurring at the specimen’s free surface, while $$J_Q$$ primarily concerns the onset stage of stable ductile tunnelling behaviour at the centre of the specimen. The $$\sigma _y/\sigma _u$$ and A are seen to have an even smaller effect on the correlation between $$J_Q$$ and the energy ( $$Cvm$$ ) dissipated up to the occurrence of the peak force in the instrumented Charpy test, in comparison with the $$Cv$$ –to– $$J_Q$$ correlation, especially for low $$Cvm$$ .
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Rock Mechanics and Modeling
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (82)
Show source-provided references
1. AISC (American Institute of Steel Construction), (2022) ANSI/AISC 360–22 Specification for Structural Steel Buildings. AISC, USA
2. Alabi AA, Moore PL, Wrobel LC et al (2018) Tensile behaviour of S690QL and S960QL under high strain rate. J Constr Steel Res 150:570–580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2018.08.00910.1016/j.jcsr.2018.08.009 ↗
3. Alexopoulos ND, Tiryakioglu M (2009) Relationship between fracture toughness and tensile properties of A357 cast aluminum alloy. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions a-Physical Metallurgy and Materials Science 40a(3):702–716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-008-9742-810.1007/s11661-008-9742-8 ↗
4. Algarni M, Bai Y, Choi Y (2015) A study of Inconel 718 dependency on stress triaxiality and Lode angle in plastic deformation and ductile fracture. Eng Fract Mech 147:140–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2015.08.00710.1016/j.engfracmech.2015.08.007 ↗
5. ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials) (2023) E1820–23b Standard Test Method for Measurement of Fracture Toughness. ASTM West Conshohocken. https://doi.org/10.1520/E1820-23B10.1520/E1820-23B ↗
6. ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials) (2024) E8/E8M - 24 Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials. ASTM, West Conshohocken
7. Bai Y, Wierzbicki T (2010) Application of extended Mohr-Coulomb criterion to ductile fracture. Int J Fract 161(1):1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-009-9422-810.1007/s10704-009-9422-8 ↗
8. Banabic D, Aretz H, Paraianu L et al (2005) Application of various FLD modelling approaches. Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng 13(5):759–769. https://doi.org/10.1088/0965-0393/13/5/00910.1088/0965-0393/13/5/009 ↗
9. Bao Y, Wierzbicki T (2005) On the cut-off value of negative triaxiality for fracture. Eng Fract Mech 72(7):1049–1069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2004.07.01110.1016/j.engfracmech.2004.07.011 ↗
10. Besseling JF, van der Giessen E (1994). Mathematical Modelling of Inelastic Deformation. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7186-910.1007/978-1-4899-7186-9 ↗
11. BSI (British Standards Institution), (2019) BS 7910 Guide to methods for assessing the acceptability of flaws in metallic structures. BSI. https://doi.org/10.3403/3036947810.3403/30369478 ↗
12. Cao TS (2015) Models for ductile damage and fracture prediction in cold bulk metal forming processes: a review. IntJ Mater Form 10(2):139–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-015-1262-710.1007/s12289-015-1262-7 ↗
13. CEN (European Committee for Standardization), (2005) EN 1993-1-1 Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures - Part 1–1: General rules and rules for buildings. CEN, Brussels
14. CEN (European Committee for Standardization), (2019) EN 10025–6 Hot rolled products of structural steels - Part 6: Technical delivery conditions for flat products of high yield strength structural steels in the quenched and tempered condition. CEN, Brussels
15. CEN (European Committee for Standardization), (2020) prEN 1993-1-1 Draft: Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures - Part 1–1: General rules and rules for buildings. CEN, Brussels
16. CEN (European Committee for Standardization), (2023) prEN 1993-1-10 Draft: Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures - Part 1–10: Material toughness and through-thickness properties. CEN, Brussels
17. Chaouadi R, Fabry A (2002) On the utilization of the instrumented Charpy impact test for characterizing the flow and fracture behavior of reactor pressure vessel steels, vol 30, Elsevier, pp 103–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1566-1369(02)80011-510.1016/S1566-1369(02)80011-5 ↗
18. Chaouadi R, Gérard R (2021) Development of a method for extracting fracture toughness from instrumented Charpy impact tests in the ductile and transition regimes. Theoret Appl Fract Mech 115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2021.10308010.1016/j.tafmec.2021.103080 ↗
19. Chatterjee S (2020) A new coefficient of correlation. J Am Stat Assoc 116(536):2009–2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2020.175811510.1080/01621459.2020.1758115 ↗
20. Chen A, Zhang P, Chen B et al (2023) A new ductile fracture model for Q460C high-strength structural steel under monotonic loading: Experimental and numerical investigation. Eng Fract Mech 288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.10935810.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.109358 ↗
21. Clausing DP (1970) Effect of plastic strain state on ductility and toughness. Int J FractMech 6(1):71–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf0018366210.1007/bf00183662 ↗
22. Considère A (1885) Mémoire sur l’emploi du fer et de l’acier. Annales des Ponts et Chaussées 9:574–775
23. Cowper GR, Symonds PS (1957) Strain hardening and strain-rate effects in the impact loading of cantilever beams. Tech. Rep. no. 28, Office of Naval Research10.21236/AD0144762 ↗
24. Dey S, Borvik T, Hopperstad OS et al (2004) The effect of target strength on the perforation of steel plates using three different projectile nose shapes. Int J Impact Eng 30(8–9):1005–1038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2004.06.00410.1016/j.ijimpeng.2004.06.004 ↗
25. Dhalla AK, Winter G (1974) Suggested steel ductility requirements. J Struct Div 100(2):445–462. https://doi.org/10.1061/jsdeag.000371710.1061/jsdeag.0003717 ↗
26. DNV (Det Norske Veritas) (2021) DNV-RU-SHIP Pt.2 Ch.2. Rules for classification: Ships: Part 2 Materials and welding 2 Metallic materials. DNV
27. Dong J, Elchalakani M, Li D, et al (2022) Dynamic hardening behavior and ductile fracture of high-strength steel at intermediate strain rates. Journal of Structural Engineering 148(9). https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.000341610.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0003416 ↗
28. DS Simulia (Dassault Systèèmes Simulia) (2022) ABAQUS 2022. Commercial Finite Element Software
29. Eason ED, Nelson EE (1989) Improved model for predicting J-R curves from charpy data. Tech. rep., U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission10.2172/6301451 ↗
30. Eason ED, Wright JE, Nelson EE (1991) Multivariable modeling of pressure vessel and piping J-R data. Tech. rep., U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission10.2172/5822791 ↗
31. Fabry A, Walle E, Chaouadi R, et al (1993) RPV steel embrittlement: Damage modeling and micro-mechanics in an engineering perspective. In: AEA/OECD Specialists Meeting on Irradiation embrittlement and optimisation of annealing, https://inis.iaea.org/records/3ny9g-49b74
32. Feldmann M, Schaffrath S (2017) Assessing the net section resistance and ductility requirements of EN 1993-1-1 and EN 1993-1-12. Steel Construction 10(4):354–36410.1002/stco.201710036 ↗
33. Feldmann M, Schaffrath S, Sandro C (2020) Draft: Background document to Eurocode 3 EN 1993 – part 1–10: Material toughness - approach for upper-shelf toughness requirements for the design of steel structures based on damage mechanics. Institute of Steel Construction RWTH Aachen University, Tech. rep
34. Feldmann M, Meissner M, Bartsch H et al (2023) Stand der Untersuchungen zu Werkstoffanforderungen hochfester Stähle S700 bis S960 – FOSTA-Forschungsverbund HOCHFEST. Stahlbau 92(8):468–483. https://doi.org/10.1002/stab.20230003310.1002/stab.202300033 ↗
35. Gioielli P, Landes J, Paris P, et al (2000) Method for Predicting J-R Curves from Charpy Impact Energy, ASTM, West Conshohocken, PA, pp 61–68. https://doi.org/10.1520/STP13395S10.1520/STP13395S ↗
36. Hirth JP, Froes FH (1977) Interrelations between fracture toughness and other mechanical-properties in titanium-alloys. Metallurgical Transactions a-Physical Metallurgy and Materials Science 8(7):1165–1176. https://doi.org/10.1007/Bf0266740210.1007/Bf02667402 ↗
37. Hollomon JHJ (1945) Tensile deformation. Transactions of the Metallurgical Society of AIME 162:268–290
38. Huo JS, Zeng X, Wang HT (2022) Tensile behaviour of TMCP Q690D high-strength structural steel at strain rates from 0.00025 to 760 s-1. Advanced Steel Construction 18(1):488–494. https://doi.org/10.18057/IJASC.2022.18.1.710.18057/IJASC.2022.18.1.7 ↗
39. IACS (International Association of Classification Societies) (2023) IACS UR W Requirements concerning material and welding. IACS
40. ISO (International Organization for Standardization) (2019) ISO 6892–1 Metallic materials - Tensile testing - Part 1: Method of test at room temperature. ISO, Geneva
41. Johnson GR, Cook WH (1985) Fracture characteristics of three metals subjected to various strains, strain rates, temperatures and pressures. Eng Fract Mech 21(1):31–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7944(85)90052-910.1016/0013-7944(85)90052-9 ↗
42. Kussmaul K, Roos E (1985) Statistical evaluation of post-yield fracture mechanics properties on the basis of the notched bar impact test. Nucl Eng Des 87:123–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5493(85)90101-310.1016/0029-5493(85)90101-3 ↗
43. Langenberg P, Nießen T, Dahl W (2000) Bruch- und verformungsverhalten von hochfesten stählen mit streckgrenzen von 690 bis 890 MPa. Stahlbau 69(4):283–291. https://doi.org/10.1002/stab.20000086010.1002/stab.200000860 ↗
44. Li HF, Wei JL, Yang SP et al (2022) The relationship between fracture toughness and tensile property in high-strength steels. Eng Fail Anal 131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.10585410.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.105854 ↗
45. Li Y, Wierzbicki T (2010) Prediction of plane strain fracture of AHSS sheets with post-initiation softening. Int J Solids Struct 47(17):2316–2327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2010.04.02810.1016/j.ijsolstr.2010.04.028 ↗
46. Lindqvist S, Wallin K (2019) Master curve procedure accounting for the combined, constraint, ductile tearing and loading rate effects. Proceedings of the ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, 2019, Vol 6a https://doi.org/10.1115/PVP2019-9384410.1115/PVP2019-93844 ↗
47. LR (Lloyd’s Register), (2024) LR-RU-002 Rules for the Manufacture. Testing and Certification of Materials, LR, London
48. Lu C, Michal G, Venton P (2015) A new fracture velocity model for high grade gas pipelines. In: 20th Joint Technical Meeting on Pipeline Research
49. Merkle JG, Johnson RE (1985) Example calculations illustrating methods for analyzing ductile flaw stability in nuclear pressure vessels. Int J Press Vessels Pip 18(1):35–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-0161(85)90025-010.1016/0308-0161(85)90025-0 ↗
50. Meyers MA (1994) Dynamic Behavior of Materials. John Wiley & Sons Inchttps://doi.org/10.1002/978047017227810.1002/9780470172278 ↗
51. Nonn A, Paredes M, Keim V, (2018) Comparison of fracture models to quantify the effects of material plasticity on the ductile fracture propagation in pipelines. In, et al (2018) 12th International Pipeline Conference, vol Volume 3: Operations, Monitoring, and Maintenance. Materials and Joining ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-7836610.1115/IPC2018-78366 ↗
52. Ruggieri C, Dodds RH (2015) An engineering methodology for constraint corrections of elastic–plastic fracture toughness – part i: A review on probabilistic models and exploration of plastic strain effects. Eng Fract Mech 134:368–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2014.12.01510.1016/j.engfracmech.2014.12.015 ↗
53. Ruggieri C, Savioli RG, Dodds RH (2015) An engineering methodology for constraint corrections of elastic–plastic fracture toughness – part ii: Effects of specimen geometry and plastic strain on cleavage fracture predictions. Eng Fract Mech 146:185–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2015.06.08710.1016/j.engfracmech.2015.06.087 ↗
54. Sakonder C, Xue L, Paredes M et al (2022) Directional dependence of critical axial strain in X65 pipeline steel subject to combined internal pressure and bending loading. Int J Press Vessels Pip 196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2022.10461010.1016/j.ijpvp.2022.104610 ↗
55. Sarzosa DFB, Paredes M, Savioli R et al (2022) Experimental and numerical study on the ductile fracture response of X65 girth-welded joint made of Inconel 625 alloy. Theoret Appl Fract Mech 121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2022.10353310.1016/j.tafmec.2022.103533 ↗
56. Schindler HJ (2001) Abschätzung von Bruchzähigkeitskennwerten aus der Bruch- oder Kerbschlagarbeit. Materialwiss Werkstofftech 32(6):544–551. https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-4052(200106)32:6<544::Aid-mawe544>3.0.Co;2-k10.1002/1521-4052(200106)32:6<544::Aid-mawe544>3.0.Co;2-k ↗
57. Sedlacek G, Feldmann M, Kühn B et al (2008) Commentary and worked examples to en 1993-1-10 “material toughness and through thickness properties” and other toughness oriented rules in en 1993 - background documents in support to the implementation, harmonization and further development of the eurocodes. Tech. rep, European Commission Joint Research Centre
58. Seo KW, Kim JY, Kim YJ et al (2024) Finite element ductile fracture simulation of Charpy and drop weight tear tests for API X52. Theoret Appl Fract Mech 133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2024.10462910.1016/j.tafmec.2024.104629 ↗
59. Seo KW, Kim JY, Kim YJ et al (2025) Combined ductile-brittle fracture simulation of API X80 under impact loading. Journal of Pipeline Science and Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpse.2025.10029510.1016/j.jpse.2025.100295 ↗
60. Shashank Dutt B, Nani Babu M, Ganesan V et al (2025) Prediction of fracture resistance from tensile properties and validation with experimental data for 316 type stainless steels. J Mater Eng Perform 34(2):1526–1539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-024-09140-z10.1007/s11665-024-09140-z ↗
61. Sreenivasan PR (2014) Estimation of quasi-static J-R curves from Charpy energy and adaptation to ASTM E 1921 reference temperature estimation of ferritic steels. Nucl Eng Des 269:125–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2013.08.01710.1016/j.nucengdes.2013.08.017 ↗
62. Studer P, Taras A (2023) Strain-hardening dependent cross-sectional slenderness limits for the plastic resistance of steel beams. J Constr Steel Res 205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2023.10787910.1016/j.jcsr.2023.107879 ↗
63. Swift HW (1952) Plastic instability under plane stress. J Mech Phys Solids 1:1–1610.1016/0022-5096(52)90002-1 ↗
64. Tanguy B, Besson J, Piques R et al (2005) Ductile to brittle transition of an A508 steel characterized by charpy impact test. Eng Fract Mech 72(3):413–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2004.03.01110.1016/j.engfracmech.2004.03.011 ↗
65. Taylor GI, Quinney H (1933) The latent energy remaining in a metal after cold working. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character 143(849):307–326. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1934.000410.1098/rspa.1934.0004 ↗
66. Wallin K (1995) Proposal for unified rules for selection of Charpy toughness criteria for both low and extra high strength steels. IIW document X-1318-95
67. Wallin K (2001) Low-cost J-R curve estimation based on CVN upper shelf energy. Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures 24(8):537–549. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1460-2695.2001.00405.x10.1046/j.1460-2695.2001.00405.x ↗
68. Wallin K (2021) Critical assessment of the Rolfe-Novak CVN-KIC upper shelf correlation. Eng Fract Mech 258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.10811710.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.108117 ↗
69. Walters CL, Wallin K (2013) The use of surface appearance in combination with charpy impact energy to determine j-integral values. In: ASME 2013 32nd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, https://doi.org/10.1115/omae2013-1037910.1115/omae2013-10379 ↗
70. Wang WM, Sluys LJ, de Borst R (1997) Viscoplasticity for instabilities due to strain softening and strain-rate softening. Int J Numer Meth Eng 40(20):3839–3864. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0207(19971030)40:20<3839::Aid-nme245>3.0.Co;2-610.1002/(sici)1097-0207(19971030)40:20<3839::Aid-nme245>3.0.Co;2-6 ↗
71. Wierzbicki T, Bao Y, Lee YW et al (2005) Calibration and evaluation of seven fracture models. Int J Mech Sci 47(4–5):719–743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2005.03.00310.1016/j.ijmecsci.2005.03.003 ↗
72. Wong WJ, Walters CL (2021) Failure modes and rules related to the yield-to-tensile strength ratio in steel structures. In: ASME 2021 40th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering (OMAE). ASME (The American Society of Mechanical Engineers), https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2021-6199510.1115/OMAE2021-61995 ↗
73. Wong WJ, Walters CL (2023) Effect of strain hardening on the rotation capacity of welded I-section high-strength steel beams. Ships and Offshore Structures pp 1–1https://doi.org/10.1080/17445302.2023.219572710.1080/17445302.2023.2195727 ↗
74. Wong WJ, Walters CL (2024) Effects of strain hardening and the Lode dependence of the fracture strain locus on slant fracture in Charpy V-notch impact testing. In: ASME 2024 43rd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering (OMAE). ASME (The American Society of Mechanical Engineers), https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2024-12563510.1115/OMAE2024-125635 ↗
75. Wong WJ, Walters CL (2025) Damage mechanics model for correlating notch toughness in Charpy impact tests with fracture toughness in cracked static fracture tests. Eng Fract Mech. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2025.11104310.1016/j.engfracmech.2025.111043 ↗
76. Xue L (2009) Stress based fracture envelope for damage plastic solids. Eng Fract Mech 76(3):419–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2008.11.01010.1016/j.engfracmech.2008.11.010 ↗
77. Xue L (2010) Localization conditions and diffused necking for damage plastic solids. Eng Fract Mech 77(8):1275–1297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2009.12.00810.1016/j.engfracmech.2009.12.008 ↗
78. Yan JB, Liew JYR, Zhang MH et al (2014) Mechanical properties of normal strength mild steel and high strength steel S690 in low temperature relevant to arctic environment. Materials & Design 61:150–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.04.05710.1016/j.matdes.2014.04.057 ↗
79. Yang X, Yang H, Zhang S (2019) Rate-dependent constitutive models of S690 high-strength structural steel. Constr Build Mater 198:597–607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.28510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.285 ↗
80. Yang X, Yang H, Lai Z et al (2020) Dynamic tensile behavior of S690 high-strength structural steel at intermediate strain rates. J Constr Steel Res 168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2020.10596110.1016/j.jcsr.2020.105961 ↗
81. Yun X, Gardner L (2017) Stress-strain curves for hot-rolled steels. J Constr Steel Res 133:36–4610.1016/j.jcsr.2017.01.024 ↗
82. Zhu XK, Leis BN (2005) Influence of yield-to-tensile strength ratio on failure assessment of corroded pipelines. J Pressure Vessel Technol 127(4):436–44210.1115/1.2042481 ↗