An analytical evaluation of T-stress influence in the process zone modelling for the interface crack kinking
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract This study presents an analysis of the influence of T-stresses on the stress field near the tip of an interfacial crack under plane strain conditions, specifically examining the initial stage of crack kinking from the interface. The analysis focuses on the formation of a small-scale process zone within the less crack-resistant elastic material of a bimaterial joint. The process zone is modeled as a discontinuity line of normal displacement, where the normal stress is assumed to be equal to the failure stress of the respective material. T-stresses are incorporated into the model by including their contribution to the asymptotic stress field near the crack tip. This asymptotic field is subsequently used to formulate the condition at infinity for the corresponding boundary value problem within the theory of elasticity. The parameters of the process zone (its length and angle of inclination) are calculated by solving the boundary value problem using the Wiener-Hopf method. From the derived solution, an equation is obtained for calculating the length and angle of inclination of the process zone. This calculation is based on the criterion of maximum potential energy accumulated within the zone. Furthermore, the energy release rate and crack opening displacement are also determined, providing essential metrics for formulating crack initiation conditions based on energy or deformation criteria. A numerical analysis was conducted to investigate the dependence of the zone's parameters on the applied load and to specifically study the effect of T-stresses on its orientation. Finally, a comparative analysis of the model's predictions for the kinking angles was performed against values reported in extant theoretical and experimental literature.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis · Fatigue and fracture mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. Ayatollahi M, Mirsayar M (2011) Kinking angles for interface cracks. Procedia Engineering 10:325–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.04.056. 11th International Conference on the Mechanical Behavior of Materials (ICM11))10.1016/j.proeng.2011.04.056 ↗
2. Barenblatt GI (1962) The Mathematical Theory of Equilibrium Cracks in Brittle Fracture. Advances in Applied Mechanics Elsevier 7:55–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2156(08)70121-210.1016/S0065-2156(08)70121-2 ↗
3. Cardew G, Goldthorpe M, Howard I, Kfouri A (1985) On the elastic T-term. Cambridge University Press, Sheffield, pp 465–476
4. Chao Y, Lam P, Zhang L (1998) Effect of constraint on fracture controlled by stress or strain. Theoret Appl Fract Mech 30(1):75–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8442(98)00043-310.1016/S0167-8442(98)00043-3 ↗
5. Chen B, Dillard DA (2001) The effect of the T-stress on crack path selection in adhesively bonded joints. Int J Adhes Adhes 21(5):357–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-7496(01)00011-210.1016/S0143-7496(01)00011-2 ↗
6. Cherepanov GP (1979) Mechanics of Brittle Fracture (translated from the Russian). McGraw-Hill
7. Cherepanov GP (1986) General theory of failure. Soviet materials science a transl of Fiziko-khimicheskaya mekhanika materialov / Academy of Sciences of the Ukrainian SSR 22(1):32–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0072086410.1007/BF00720864 ↗
8. Cho YJ, Beom HG, Earmme YY (1994) Application of a conservation integral to an interface crack interacting with singularities. Int J Fract 65(1):63–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0001714310.1007/BF00017143 ↗
9. Comninou M (1977) The interface crack. J Appl Mech 44(4):631–636. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.342414810.1115/1.3424148 ↗
10. Comninou M, Schmueser D (1979) The Interface Crack in a Combined Tension-Compression and Shear Field. J Appl Mech 46(2):345–348. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.342455310.1115/1.3424553 ↗
11. Cotterell B, Rice J (1980) Slightly curved or kinked cracks. Int J Fract 16(2):155–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0001261910.1007/BF00012619 ↗
12. Dundurs J, Bogy DB (1969) Edge-bonded dissimilar orthogonal elastic wedges under normal and shear loading’’ (Bogy, D. B., 1968, ASME J. Appl. Mech., 35, pp. 460–466). J Appl Mech 36(3):650–65210.1115/1.3564739 ↗
13. England AH (1965) A crack between dissimilar media. J Appl Mech 32(2):400–402. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.362581310.1115/1.3625813 ↗
14. Erdogan F (1965) Stress distribution in bonded dissimilar materials with cracks. J Appl Mech 32(2):403–41010.1115/1.3625814 ↗
15. Gakhov F (1990) Boundary Value Problems. Dover books on advanced mathematics, Dover
16. Gautesen AK, Dundurs J (1988) The Interface Crack Under Combined Loading. J Appl Mech 55(3):580–586. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.312583310.1115/1.3125833 ↗
17. Geubelle PH, Knauss WG (1994) Crack Propagation at and Near Bimaterial Interfaces: Linear Analysis. J Appl Mech 61(3):560–566. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.290149610.1115/1.2901496 ↗
18. Hancock JW, Reuter WG, Parks DM (1993) Constraint and Toughness Parameterized by T, American Society for Testing and Materials, p 21–4010.1520/STP18021S ↗
19. He MY, Hutchinson JW (1989) Kinking of a Crack Out of an Interface. J Appl Mech 56(2):270–278. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.317607810.1115/1.3176078 ↗
20. He MY, Bartlett A, Evans AG, Hutchinson JW (1991) Kinking of a Crack out of an Interface: Role of In-Plane Stress. J Am Ceram Soc 74(4):767–771. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1151-2916.1991.tb06922.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1991.tb06922.x ↗
21. Kaminsky A, Dudyk M, Reshitnyk Y, Chornoivan Y (2023) An analytical method of modeling the process zone near the tip of an interface crack due to its kinking from the interface of quasi-elastic materials. Int J Solids Struct 267:112117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2023.11211710.1016/j.ijsolstr.2023.112117 ↗
22. Kaminsky AA, Dudik MV, Kipnis LA (2006) On the direction of development of a thin fracture process zone at the tip of an interfacial crack between dissimilar media. Int Appl Mech 42(2):136–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10778-006-0068-110.1007/s10778-006-0068-1 ↗
23. Kaminsky AA, Dudik MV, Kipnis LA (2007) Initial kinking of an interface crack between two elastic media. Int Appl Mech 43(10):1090–1099. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10778-007-0109-410.1007/s10778-007-0109-4 ↗
24. Kaminsky AA, Dudik MV, Kipnis LA (2009) Initial kinking of an interface crack between two elastic media under tension and shear. Int Appl Mech 45(6):635–642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10778-009-0214-710.1007/s10778-009-0214-7 ↗
25. Kang KJ (1994) Criteria for kinking out of interface crack. Eng Fract Mech 49(4):587–598. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7944(94)90051-510.1016/0013-7944(94)90051-5 ↗
26. Kim J, Moon H, Earmme Y (2001) Inplane and antiplane T-stresses for an interface crack in anisotropic bimaterial. Mech Mater 33(1):21–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6636(00)00034-X10.1016/S0167-6636(00)00034-X ↗
27. Kim JH, Vlassak JJ (2006) T-Stress of a Bi-Material Strip Under Generalized Edge Loads. Int J Fract 142(3–4):315–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-006-9033-610.1007/s10704-006-9033-6 ↗
28. Larsson S, Carlsson A (1973) Influence of non-singular stress terms and specimen geometry on small-scale yielding at crack tips in elastic-plastic materials. J Mech Phys Solids 21(4):263–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(73)90024-010.1016/0022-5096(73)90024-0 ↗
29. Leblond JB, Frelat J (2001) Crack kinking from an interface crack with initial contact between the crack lips. Eur J Mech A Solids 20(6):937–951. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0997-7538(01)01173-110.1016/S0997-7538(01)01173-1 ↗
30. Leblond JB, Frelat J (2004) Crack kinking from an initially closed, ordinary or interface crack, in the presence of friction. Engineering Fracture Mechanics - ENG FRACTURE MECH 71:289–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7944(03)00137-110.1016/S0013-7944(03)00137-1 ↗
31. Leguillon D, Murer S (2008) A Criterion for Crack Kinking Out of an Interface. Key Eng Mater 385–387:9–12. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.385-387.910.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.385-387.9 ↗
32. Melin S (2002) The influence of the T-stress on the directional stability of cracks. Int J Fract 114(3):259–265. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:101552162989810.1023/A:1015521629898 ↗
33. Moon H, Earmme Y (1998) Calculation of elastic T-stresses near interface crack tip under in-plane and anti-plane loading. Int J Fract 91(2):179–195. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:100745772055010.1023/A:1007457720550 ↗
34. Muthu N, Maiti S, Falzon B, Yan W (2016) Crack propagation in non-homogenous materials: Evaluation of mixed-mode SIFs, T-stress and kinking angle using a variant of EFG Method. Eng Anal Boundary Elem 72:11–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enganabound.2016.07.01710.1016/j.enganabound.2016.07.017 ↗
35. Nayfeh A (2008) Perturbation Methods. Wiley, Physics textbook
36. Noble B (1988) Methods Based on the Wiener Hopf Technique for the Solution of Partial Differential Equations, 2nd edn. Chelsea Publ, Comp
37. Panasyuk V (1969) Limiting Equilibrium of Brittle Solids with Fractures. Management Information Services
38. Perez N (2004) Fracture Mechanics. Springer US Boston MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-7861-7_310.1007/1-4020-7861-7_3 ↗
39. Rice J (1974) Limitations to the small scale yielding approximation for crack tip plasticity. J Mech Phys Solids 22(1):17–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(74)90010-610.1016/0022-5096(74)90010-6 ↗
40. Rice JR (1988) Elastic Fracture Mechanics Concepts for Interfacial Cracks. J Appl Mech 55(1):98–103. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.317366810.1115/1.3173668 ↗
41. Rice JR, Sih GC (1965) Plane problems of cracks in dissimilar media. J Appl Mech 32(2):418–423. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.362581610.1115/1.3625816 ↗
42. Shan B, Pelegri AA (2003) Assessment of the Fracture Behavior of an Asymmetrically Loaded Cantilever Composite Structure. J Eng Mater Technol 125(4):353–360. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.160510810.1115/1.1605108 ↗
43. Shan BX, Pelegri AA, Pan Y (2008) Interfacial crack kinking subjected to contact effects. J Mech Mater Struct 3:591–605. https://doi.org/10.2140/jomms.2008.3.59110.2140/jomms.2008.3.591 ↗
44. Sladek J, Sladek V (1997) Evaluations of the T-stress for interface cracks by the boundary element method. Eng Fract Mech 56(6):813–825. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7944(96)00131-210.1016/S0013-7944(96)00131-2 ↗
45. Williams ML (1959) The stresses around a fault or crack in dissimilar media. Bull Seismol Soc Am 49(2):199–204. https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA049002019910.1785/BSSA0490020199 ↗
46. Xie D, Waas AM, Shahwan KW, Schroeder JA, Boeman RG (2005) Fracture criterion for kinking cracks in a tri-material adhesively bonded joint under mixed mode loading. Eng Fract Mech 72(16):2487–2504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2005.03.00810.1016/j.engfracmech.2005.03.008 ↗
47. Yu H, Wu L, Li H (2012) T-stress evaluations of an interface crack in the materials with complex interfaces. Int J Fract 177(1):25–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-012-9747-610.1007/s10704-012-9747-6 ↗
48. Zhou S, Li L (2023) Effect of T-Stress on Crack-Tip Stress Field and Crack Propagation of Concrete. Math Probl Eng 2023:4139387. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/413938710.1155/2023/4139387 ↗