Phase field approach for managing multi-fragment interactions in load-bearing fractured media
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract This work introduces a novel approach for characterizing the residual load bearing capacity of fractured components based on the Phase Field fracture model. The underlying idea involves exploiting this well-established framework for fracturing materials and applying it to mechanically loaded domains in which fracture has already occurred. Hence, the continuous phase field here portrays the smeared representation of known crack patterns, based on which the unilateral contact interactions between the crack lips are enforced through a suitable strain energy decomposition. This allows for a theoretically robust and implicit treatment of the originally discontinuous problem while remaining in a continuum framework. As such, the proposed approach avoids the numerically challenging definition and management of conventional contact pairs, thus proving to be especially promising for its application to domains with multiple fragments. Besides presenting the theoretical foundation and algorithmic convenience of the approach, its accuracy and representativeness are proven against theoretical predictions and numerical results from Finite Element models featuring conventional contact interactions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Numerical methods in engineering · Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. Alnæs MS, Blechta J, Hake J et al (2015) FEniCS project version 1.5. Arch Numer Softw 3:9-23. https://doi.org/10.11588/ans.2015.100.2055310.11588/ans.2015.100.20553 ↗
2. Ambrosio L, Tortorelli VM (1990) Approximation of functional depending on jumps by elliptic functional via t-convergence. Commun Pure Appl Math 43:999–1036. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpa.316043080510.1002/cpa.3160430805 ↗
3. Amor H, Marigo JJ, Maurini C (2009) Regularized formulation of the variational brittle fracture with unilateral contact: numerical experiments. J Mech Phys Solids 57:1209–1229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2009.04.01110.1016/j.jmps.2009.04.011 ↗
4. Angelides SC, Talbot JP, Overend M (2022) The influence of fracture pattern on the residual resistance of laminated glass at high strain-rates: an experimental investigation of the post-fracture bending moment capacity based on time-temperature mapping of interlayer yield stress. Glass Struct Eng 7:549–568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40940-022-00168-y10.1007/s40940-022-00168-y ↗
5. Baratta IA, Dean JP, Dokken JS et al (2023) DOLFINx: the next generation FEniCS problem solving environment. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1044766610.5281/zenodo.10447666 ↗
6. Bedon C, Fasan M (2024) Post-fracture stiffness and residual capacity assessment of film-retrofitted monolithic glass elements by frequency change. Math Probl Eng 2024:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/892230310.1155/2024/8922303 ↗
7. Biolzi L, Cattaneo S, Orlando M et al (2018) Post-failure behavior of laminated glass beams using different interlayers. Compos Struct 202:578–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.03.00910.1016/j.compstruct.2018.03.009 ↗
8. Biolzi L, Casolo S, Orlando M, Tateo V (2019) Modelling the response of a laminated tempered glass for different configurations of damage by a rigid body spring model. Eng Fract Mech 218:106596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.10659610.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.106596 ↗
9. Bleyer J, Roux-Langlois C, Molinari JF (2017) Dynamic crack propagation with a variational phase-field model: limiting speed, crack branching and velocity-toughening mechanisms. Int J Fract 204:79–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-016-0163-110.1007/s10704-016-0163-1 ↗
10. Bourdin B, Francfort GA, Marigo JJ (2000) Numerical experiments in revisited brittle fracture. J Mech Phys Solids 48:797–826. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5096(99)00028-910.1016/S0022-5096(99)00028-9 ↗
11. Casolo S (1999) Rigid element model for non-linear analysis of masonry facades subjected to out-of-plane loading. Commun Numer Methods Eng 15:457–46810.1002/(SICI)1099-0887(199907)15:7<457::AID-CNM259>3.0.CO;2-W ↗
12. Casolo S (2004) Modelling in-plane micro-structure of masonry walls by rigid elements. Int J Solids Struct 41:3625–3641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.02.00210.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.02.002 ↗
13. Chambolle A, Conti S, Francfort GA (2018) Approximation of a brittle fracture energy with a constraint of non-interpenetration. Arch Ration Mech Anal 228:867–889. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00205-017-1207-z10.1007/s00205-017-1207-z ↗
14. Chao Correas A, Reinoso J, Cornetti P, Corrado M (2024) On the (lack of) representativeness of quasi-static variational fracture models for unstable crack propagation. J Mech Phys Solids 186:105573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2024.10557310.1016/j.jmps.2024.105573 ↗
15. Corrado M, Chao Correas A, Ventura G (2024) Phase field fracture model for assessing the load bearing capacity of fractured glass. Chall Glas Conf Proc 9:594. https://doi.org/10.47982/cgc.9.59410.47982/cgc.9.594 ↗
16. De Lorenzis L, Maurini C (2022) Nucleation under multi-axial loading in variational phase-field models of brittle fracture. Int J Fract 237:61–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-021-00555-610.1007/s10704-021-00555-6 ↗
17. Fei F, Choo J (2019) A phase-field method for modeling cracks with frictional contact. Int J Numer Methods Eng 121:740–762. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.624210.1002/nme.6242 ↗
18. Francfort GA, Marigo JJ (1998) Revisiting brittle fracture as an energy minimization problem. J Mech Phys Solids 46:1319–1342. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5096(98)00034-910.1016/S0022-5096(98)00034-9 ↗
19. Geuzaine C, Remacle JF (2009) GMSH: a three-dimensional finite element mesh generator with built-in pre- and post-processing facilities. Int J Numer Methods Eng 79(11):1309–1331. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.257910.1002/nme.2579 ↗
20. Inkscape Project (2023) Inkscape. https://inkscape.org
21. Koureas I, Pundir M, Feldfogel S, Kammer DS (2022) On the failure of beam-like topologically interlocked structures. J Mech Phys Solids 259:112029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2022.11202910.1016/j.ijsolstr.2022.112029 ↗
22. Kumar A, Bourdin B, Francfort GA, Lopez-Pamies O (2020) Revisiting nucleation in the phase-field approach to brittle fracture. J Mech Phys Solids 142:104027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2020.10402710.1016/j.jmps.2020.104027 ↗
23. Lopez-Pamies O, Dolbow JE, Francfort GA, Larsen CJ (2025) Classical variational phase-field models cannot predict fracture nucleation. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 433A:117520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2024.11752010.1016/j.cma.2024.117520 ↗
24. Lorez F, Pundir M, Kammer DS (2024) Eulerian framework for contact between solids represented as phase fields. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 418A:116497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2023.11649710.1016/j.cma.2023.116497 ↗
25. Marigo JJ, Maurini C, Pham K (2016) An overview of the modelling of fracture by gradient damage models. Meccanica 51:3107–3128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-016-0538-410.1007/s11012-016-0538-4 ↗
26. Nielsen JH, Schneider J, Kraus MA (2022) The in-plane expansion of fractured thermally pre-stressed glass panes: an equivalent temperature difference model for engineering glass design. Constr Build Mater 327:126849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12684910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.126849 ↗
27. OpenCV Project (2024) OpenCV. https://opencv.org
28. Pham K, Amor H, Marigo JJ, Maurini C (2011) Gradient damage models and their use to approximate brittle fracture. Int J Damage Mech 20:618–652. https://doi.org/10.1177/105678951038685210.1177/1056789510386852 ↗
29. Steinke C, Kaliske M (2019) A phase-field crack model based on directional stress decomposition. Comput Mech 63:1019–1046. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-018-1635-010.1007/s00466-018-1635-0 ↗
30. Strobl M, Seelig T (2015) On constitutive assumptions in phase field approaches to brittle fracture. Procedia Struct Integr 2:3705–3712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2016.06.46010.1016/j.prostr.2016.06.460 ↗
31. Veer FA, Louter PC, Bos FP et al (2008) The strength of architectural glass. Chall Glas Conf Proc 1:419–428. https://doi.org/10.7480/cgc.110.7480/cgc.1 ↗
32. Vicentini F, Zolesi C, Carrara P et al (2024) On the energy decomposition in variational phase-field models for brittle fracture under multi-axial stress states. Int J Fract 247:291–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-024-00763-w10.1007/s10704-024-00763-w ↗
33. Williams A, Siegmund T (2021) Mechanics of topologically interlocked material systems under point load: Archimedean and Laves tiling. Int J Mech Sci 190:106016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.10601610.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.106016 ↗
34. Yin Z, Hannard F, Barthelat F (2019) Impact-resistant nacre-like transparent materials. Science 364:1260–1263. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaw898810.1126/science.aaw8988 ↗