Interpretable crack features for the representation of kinematic fields in the case of fatigue overloads
Source abstract
Abstract
Many engineering structures are subjected to variable amplitude loading. A number of studies investigate the effects of post overload, even-though it is crucial to describe what occurs during the overloading. The aim of this paper is to provide effective independent descriptors based on purely kinematic measurements for the analysis of overloading. Fatigue tests were conducted on a SENT specimen. Investigating crack propagation was through direct measurements using Digital Image Correlation and Linear Elastic Fracture Mechanics via Williams’ series expansion. The higher terms in Williams’ series expansion, referred to as crack features were analyzed in cycles with and without overload. In a case without overload, all features exhibit a proportional regime. Singular value decomposition (SVD) analysis confirms that a single feature is adequate to characterize the mechanism. In a cycle with overload, the regime changes during the overloading phase, making it a signature of this phase. In this case, the SVD analysis reveals that two descriptors are needed for these cycles. A subsequent analysis allows the definition of two physically interpretable features. This work presents a robust method to identify, based on kinematic measurements and SVD analysis, independent descriptors for the processes that occur during a cycle with overload.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. Beden S, Shahrum A, Ariffin AK (2009) Review of fatigue crack propagation models for metallic components. Eur J Sci Res 28(3):364–397
2. Besnard G, Hild F, Roux S (2006) “Finite-Element’’ displacement fields analysis from digital images: application to Portevin-Le Châtelier bands. Exp Mech 46(6):789–80310.1007/s11340-006-9824-8 ↗
3. Hamam R, Hild F, Roux S (2007) Stress intensity factor gauging by digital image correlation: application in cyclic fatigue. Strain 43(3):181–19210.1111/j.1475-1305.2007.00345.x ↗
4. Henninger C, Roux S, Hild F (2010) Enriched kinematic fields of cracked structures. Int J Solids Struct 47(24):3305–331610.1016/j.ijsolstr.2010.08.012 ↗
5. Jones RE (1973) Fatigue crack growth retardation after single-cycle peak overload in Ti-6Al-4V Titanium alloy. Eng Fract Mech 5:585–60410.1016/0013-7944(73)90042-8 ↗
6. Makabe C, Purnowidodo A, McEvily AJ (2004) Effects of surface deformation and crack closure on fatigue crack propagation after overloading and underloading. Int J Fatigue 26(12):1341–134810.1016/j.ijfatigue.2004.03.017 ↗
7. Paris P, Erdogan F (1963) A critical analysis of crack propagation laws. J Basic Eng 85(4):528–53310.1115/1.3656900 ↗
8. Réthoré J (2015) Automatic crack tip detection and stress intensity factors estimation of curved cracks from digital images: automatic crack tip detection and SIF estimation of curved cracks. Int J Numer Meth Eng 103(7):516–53410.1002/nme.4905 ↗
9. Réthoré J (2018) UFreckles
10. Roux S, Hild F (2006) Stress intensity factor measurements from digital image correlation: post-processing and integrated approaches. Int J Fract 140(1–4):141–15710.1007/s10704-006-6631-2 ↗
11. Roux-Langlois C, Gravouil A, Baietto MC, Réthoré J, Mathieu F, Hild F, Roux S (2015) DIC identification and X-FEM simulation of fatigue crack growth based on the Williams’ series. Int J Solids Struct 53:38–4710.1016/j.ijsolstr.2014.10.026 ↗
12. Saxena A, Landes JD, Bassani JL, Nicoletto W (1988) Fatigue crack-tip mechanics in 7075-T6 aluminium alloy from high-sensitivity displacement field measurements. Nonlinear fracture mechanics, vol 1. ASTM International
13. Schijve J, Broek D (1962) The results of a test programme based on a gust spectrum with variable amplitude loading. Aircraft Eng 34:314–610.1108/eb033633 ↗
14. Shuter DM, Geary W (1996) Some aspects of fatigue crack growth retardation behaviour following tensile overloads in a structural steel. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 19(2–3):185–199. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2695.1996.tb00958.x10.1111/j.1460-2695.1996.tb00958.x ↗
15. Singh SSK, Abdullah S, Nikabdullah N (2017) The needs of understanding stochastic fatigue failure for the automobile crankshaft: a review. Eng Fail Anal 80:464–47110.1016/j.engfailanal.2017.06.023 ↗
16. Skorupa M, Skorupa A, Schijve J, Machniewicz T, Korbut P (2000) Effect of specimen thickness and stress ratio on fatigue crack growth after a single overload cycle on structural steel. Elsevier, Amsterdam
17. Sun C, Lei Z, Hong Y (2014) Effects of stress ratio on crack growth rate and fatigue strength for high cycle and very-high-cycle fatigue of metallic materials. Mech Mater 69(1):227–23610.1016/j.mechmat.2013.10.007 ↗
18. Suresh S (1983) Micromechanisms of fatigue crack growth retardation following overloads. Eng Fract Mech 18:577–59310.1016/0013-7944(83)90051-6 ↗
19. Ward-Close CM, Blom AF, Ritchie RO (1989) Mechanisms associated with transient fatigue crack growth under variable-amplitude loading: an experimental and numerical study. Eng Fract Mech 32(4):613–63810.1016/0013-7944(89)90195-1 ↗
20. Wild G, Pollock L, Abdelwahab AK, Murray J (2021) Need for aerospace structural health monitoring: a review of aircraft fatigue accidents. Int J Progn Health Manag 12(3):1
21. Williams ML (1957) On the stress distribution at the base of a stationary crack. J Appl Mech 24(1):109–11410.1115/1.4011454 ↗