A solution to the parameter-identification conundrum: multi-scale interaction potentials
Source abstract
Abstract
Softening is a structural property, not a material property. Any material will show softening, but in this paper the focus is primarily on cement and concrete, which show this property very clearly owing to their coarse heterogeneity (relative to common laboratory-scale specimen sizes). A new model approach is presented, based on pair-potentials describing the interaction between two neighbouring particles at any desired size/scale level. Because of the resemblance with a particle model an equivalent lattice can be constructed. The pair-potential is then the behavioral law of a single lattice element. This relation between force and displacement depends on the size of the considered lattice element as well as on the rotational stiffness at the nodes, which not only depends on the flexibility of the global lattice to which the element is connected but also on the flexural stiffness of the considered element itself. The potential F-r relation is a structural property that can be directly measured in physical experiments, thereby solving size effects and boundary effects. © 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Rock Mechanics and Modeling · Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Composite Material Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Akita H, Koide H, Mihashi H (2007) Specimen geometry in uniaxial tension test of concrete. In: Carpinteri A et al (eds) Proceedings FraMCoS-6. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 243–248
2. Bažant ZP (1984) Size effect in blunt fracture: concrete, rock, metal. J Eng Mech 110:518–53510.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1984)110:4(518) ↗
3. Beranek WJ, Hobbelman GJ (1992) Handboek voor het mechanisch gedrag van metselwerk (Glossary of the mechanical behaviour of masonry). Report C-77, CUR Foundation, Gouda (in Dutch)
4. Beranek WJ, Hobbelman GJ (1994) Constitutive modelling of structural concrete as an assemblage of spheres. In: Mang H, Bicanic N, de Borst R (eds) Computational models of concrete structures, proceedings EURO-C. Pineridge Press, Swansea, pp 535–542
5. Carpinteri A, Chiaia B, Cornetti P (2003) On the mechanics of quasi-brittle materials with a fractal microstructure. Eng Fract Mech 70:2321–234910.1016/S0013-7944(02)00220-5 ↗
6. Constantinides G, Ulm FJ (2004) The effect of two types of C-S-H on the elasticity of cement-based materials: results from nano-indentation and micro-mechanical modeling. Cem Conc Res 34(1):67–7010.1016/S0008-8846(03)00230-8 ↗
7. Duan K, Hu X (2004) Specimen boundary induced size effect on quasi-brittle fracture. Strength Fract Complex 2:47–6810.3233/SFC-2004-030 ↗
8. Evans RH, Marathe MS (1968) Microcracking and stress-strain curves for concrete in tension. Mater Struct (RILEM) 1(1):61–64
9. Herrmann HJ, Hansen A, Roux S (1989) Fracture of disordered elastic lattices in two dimensions. Phys Rev B 39(1): 637–64810.1103/PhysRevB.39.637 ↗
10. Hillerborg A, Modeér M, Peterson P-E (1976) Analysis of crack formation and crack growth in concrete by means of fracture mechanics and finite elements. Cem Conc Res 6:773–78210.1016/0008-8846(76)90007-7 ↗
11. Hordijk DA (1991) Local approach to fatigue of concrete. PhD thesis, Delft University of Technology
12. Ince R, Arslan A, Karihaloo BL (2003) Lattice modeling of size effect in concrete strength. Eng Fract Mech 70:2307–232010.1016/S0013-7944(02)00219-9 ↗
13. Lilliu G, Van Mier JGM (2003) 3D lattice type fracture model for concrete. Eng Fract Mech 70(7/8):927–94210.1016/S0013-7944(02)00158-3 ↗
14. Meyer D, Man H-K, Van Mier JGM (2009) Fracture of foamed cementitious materials: a combined experimental and numerical study. In: Zhao H, Fleck NA (eds), Mechanical properties of cellular materials. New York: IUTAM Bookseries 12, Springer Science+ Business, Media, 115–12310.1007/978-1-4020-9404-0_13 ↗
15. Mindess S (1991) Fracture process zone detection. In: Shah SP, Carpinteri A (eds) Fracture mechanics test methods for concrete. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 231–261
16. Roux S, Guyon E (1985) Mechanical percolation: a small beam lattice study. J Phys Lett 46:L999–L100410.1051/jphyslet:019850046021099900 ↗
17. Schlangen E, Van Mier JGM (1992) Experimental and numerical analysis of the micro-mechanisms of fracture of cement-based composites. Cem Conc Comp 14(2):105–11810.1016/0958-9465(92)90004-F ↗
18. Schlangen E, Van Mier JGM (1994) Fracture simulations in concrete and rock using a random lattice. In: Siriwardane H, Zaman MM (eds) Computer methods and advances in geomechanics. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 1641–1646
19. Termonia Y, Meakin P (1986) Formation of fractal cracks in a kinetic fracture model. Nature 320:429–43110.1038/320429a0 ↗
20. Trtik P, Stähli P, Landis EN, Stampanoni M, Van Mier JGM (2007) Microtensile testing and 3D imaging of hydrated portland cement. In: Carpinteri A, Gambarova P, Ferro G, Plizzari G (eds), Proceedings 6th international conference on fracture mechanics of concrete and concrete structures (FraMCoS-VI). London: Taylor & Francis, 1277–1282
21. Van Mier JGM (1986) Fracture of concrete under complex stress. HERON 31(3):1–90
22. Van Mier JGM (2007) Multi-scale interaction potentials $$(F-r)$$ ( F − r ) for describing fracture of brittle disordered materials like cement and concrete. Int J Fract 143(1):41–7810.1007/s10704-007-9050-0 ↗
23. Van Mier JGM (2009) Mode II fracture localization in concrete loaded in compression. J Eng Mech (ASCE) 135(1):1–810.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2009)135:1(1) ↗
24. Van Mier JGM (2012) Concrete fracture—multiscale approach. Taylor & Francis/CRC Press, Boca Raton10.1201/b12968 ↗
25. Van Mier JGM, Nooru-Mohamed MB (1990) Geometrical and structural aspects of concrete fracture. Eng Fract Mech 35(4/5):617–62810.1016/0013-7944(90)90144-6 ↗
26. Van Mier JGM, Schlangen E, Vervuurt A (1995) Lattice type fracture models for concrete. In: Mühlhaus H-B (ed) Continuum models for materials with micro-structure. Wiley, Chichester, pp 341–377
27. Van Mier JGM, Shi C (2002) Stability issues in uniaxial tensile tests on brittle disordered materials. Int J Solids Struct 39:3359–337210.1016/S0020-7683(02)00159-2 ↗
28. Van Mier JGM, Van Vliet MRA (2003) Influence of microstructure of concrete on size/scale effects in tensile fracture. Eng Fract Mech 70(16):2281–230610.1016/S0013-7944(02)00222-9 ↗
29. Van Vliet MRA, Van Mier JGM (2000) Experimental investigation of size effect in concrete and sandstone under uniaxial tension. Eng Fract Mech 65(2/3):165–18810.1016/S0013-7944(99)00114-9 ↗
30. Weibull W (1939) A statistical theory of strength of materials. Roy Swedish Inst Eng Res 151:1–45