journal article·2005-02

Response to the discussion by I.V. Rokach of the paper entitled: ?Analysis of the dynamic responses for a pre-cracked three-point bend specimen?

Fengchun Jiang, Aashish Rohatgi, Kenneth S. Vecchio, Justin L. Cheney

International Journal of Fracture· Volume 131· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

The following response to the discussion of the above mentioned paper is divided into two parts: (1) a response to the issue of our comparison of the ‘apparent period of specimen oscillation’, τ, and the natural vibration period of a cracked specimen, T, and (2) a verification of the applicability of our model to ‘short time-to-fracture’ tests, which Rokach has questioned, due to a lack of knowledge of Hopkinson bar techniques.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Electromagnetic Launch and Propulsion Technology · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (7)

Show source-provided references
1. Rokach, I.V. (2004). Discussion on the paper ?Analysis of the dynamic response for a pre-cracked three-point bend specimen? by Fengchun Jiang, Aashish Rohatgi, Kenneth S. Vecchio and Justin L. Cheney, International Journal of Fracture (accepted).
2. Jiang Fengchun · International Journal of Fracture · 2004 · 127 · 14710.1023/B:FRAC.0000035058.03627.30 ↗
3. J.G. Williams · International Journal of Fracture · 1987 · 33 · 20910.1007/BF00013171 ↗
4. P.R. Marur · International Journal of Fracture · 1994 · 77 · 36710.1007/BF00036253 ↗
5. A.G. Dutton · International Journal of Fracture · 1991 · 51 · 18710.1007/BF00045806 ↗
6. C.H. Popelar · Experimental Mechanics · 2000 · 40 · 40110.1007/BF02326486 ↗
7. W.G. Guo · Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics · 1997 · 26 · 2910.1016/S0167-8442(96)00031-6 ↗