The Brittle Versus the Ductile Nature of Fracture Modes I and II
Source abstract
Abstract
Failure surface orientations are determined for states of uniaxail tensile stress and shiar stree appropriate to fracture Modes I and II. The method uses a newly developed failure criterion along with the associated flow rule. The failure angles show a sharp demarcation between ductile and brittle material types. Only the brittle materials class show consistency and likely represents a shear localization effect rether than explicit fracture.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Fatigue and fracture mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (4)
Show source-provided references
1. Broberg, K. B. (1999). Cracks and Fracture, Academic Press, New York.
2. Christensen, R. M. (2003). A Two Property Yield, Failure (Fracture) Criterion for Homogeneous, Isotropic Materials, J. Engineering Materials and Technology, in press.10.1115/1.1631024 ↗
3. Kachanov, L. M., (1971). Foundations of The Theory of Plasticity, North-Holland, Amsterdam.
4. Nadai, A., (1950). Theory of Flow and Fracture of Solids, Vols. I and II, McGraw-Hill, New York.