Simple projection method: a novel algorithm for estimation of characteristic element length in finite element simulations of composites
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization · Composite Material Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. ASTM D7136/D7136M-15 (2015) Standard test method for measuring the damage resistance of a fiber-reinforced polymer matrix composite to a drop-weight. Impact Event, ASTM International
2. Barouni AK, Dhakal HN (2019) Damage investigation and assessment due to low-velocity impact on flax/glass hybrid composite plates. Compos Struct 226:111224. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPSTRUCT.2019.11122410.1016/J.COMPSTRUCT.2019.111224 ↗
3. Bažant ZP, Oh BH (1983) Crack band theory for fracture of concrete. Matériaux Et Constructions 16(3):155–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0248626710.1007/BF02486267 ↗
4. Benzeggagh ML, Kenane M (1996) Measurement of mixed-mode delamination fracture toughness of unidirectional glass/epoxy composites with mixed-mode bending apparatus. Compos Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-3538(96)00005-X10.1016/0266-3538(96)00005-X ↗
5. Braden B (1986) The Surveyor’s area formula. Coll Math J 17(4):326–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/07468342.1986.1197297410.1080/07468342.1986.11972974 ↗
6. Carlile D, Leach D, Moore D, Zahlan N (2008) Mechanical Properties of the Carbon Fiber/PEEK Composite APC-2/AS-4 for Structural Applications. In: Advances in thermoplastic matrix composite materials. ASTM International, pp 199–199–14. https://doi.org/10.1520/stp24603s10.1520/stp24603s ↗
7. Červenka J, Červenka V, Laserna S (2018) On crack band model in finite element analysis of concrete fracture in engineering practice. Eng Fract Mech 197:27–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENGFRACMECH.2018.04.01010.1016/J.ENGFRACMECH.2018.04.010 ↗
8. Červenka V, Pukl R, Ožbolt J, Eligehausen R (1995) Mesh sensitivity in smeared finite element analysis of concrete fracture. In: Fracture mechanics of concrete structures, pp 1387–1396
9. Chen JF, Morozov EV, Shankar K (2012) A combined elastoplastic damage model for progressive failure analysis of composite materials and structures. Compos Struct 94(12):3478–3489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.04.02110.1016/j.compstruct.2012.04.021 ↗
10. Chen WF, Bazant ZP, Planas J, Kim S-E, Lui EM, Mossallam KH, Toma S, Toma S, Cheung YK, Tham LG, Fang H-Y (2019) Fracture and size effect in concrete and other quasibrittle materials. Fract Size Effect Concrete Quasibrittle Mater. https://doi.org/10.1201/978020375679910.1201/9780203756799 ↗
11. Falcó O, Ávila RL, Tijs B, Lopes CS (2018) Modelling and simulation methodology for unidirectional composite laminates in a Virtual Test Lab framework. Compos Struct 190:137–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPSTRUCT.2018.02.01610.1016/J.COMPSTRUCT.2018.02.016 ↗
12. González EV, Maimí P, Camanho PP, Lopes CS, Blanco N (2011) Effects of ply clustering in laminated composite plates under low-velocity impact loading. Compos Sci Technol 71(6):805–817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.12.01810.1016/j.compscitech.2010.12.018 ↗
13. González EV, Maimí P, Martín-Santos E, Soto A, Cruz P, Martín de la Escalera F, Sainz de Aja JR (2018) Simulating drop-weight impact and compression after impact tests on composite laminates using conventional shell finite elements. Int J Solids Struct 144–145:230–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJSOLSTR.2018.05.00510.1016/J.IJSOLSTR.2018.05.005 ↗
14. Jirásek M, Bauer M (2012) Numerical aspects of the crack band approach. Comput Struct 110–111:60–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPSTRUC.2012.06.00610.1016/J.COMPSTRUC.2012.06.006 ↗
15. Kawai M, Masuko Y, Kawase Y, Negishi R (2001) Micromechanical analysis of the off-axis rate-dependent inelastic behavior of unidirectional AS4/PEEK at high temperature. Int J Mech Sci 43(9):2069–2090. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7403(01)00029-710.1016/S0020-7403(01)00029-7 ↗
16. Li X, Ma D, Liu H, Tan W, Gong X, Zhang C, Li Y (2019) Assessment of failure criteria and damage evolution methods for composite laminates under low-velocity impact. Compos Struct 207:727–739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.09.09310.1016/j.compstruct.2018.09.093 ↗
17. Lin S, Thorsson SI, Waas AM (2020) Predicting the low velocity impact damage of a quasi-isotropic laminate using EST. Compos Struct 251:112530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11253010.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112530 ↗
18. Liu PF, Liao BB, Jia LY, Peng XQ (2016) Finite element analysis of dynamic progressive failure of carbon fiber composite laminates under low velocity impact. Compos Struct 149:408–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.04.01210.1016/j.compstruct.2016.04.012 ↗
19. Lopes CS, Sádaba S, González C, Llorca J, Camanho PP (2016) Physically-sound simulation of low-velocity impact on fiber reinforced laminates. Int J Impact Eng 92:3–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2015.05.01410.1016/j.ijimpeng.2015.05.014 ↗
20. Maa RH, Cheng JH (2002) A CDM-based failure model for predicting strength of notched composite laminates. Compos B Eng 33(6):479–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-8368(02)00030-610.1016/S1359-8368(02)00030-6 ↗
21. Maimí P, Camanho PP, Mayugo JA, Dávila CG (2007) A continuum damage model for composite laminates: Part II—Computational implementation and validation. Mech Mater 39(10):909–919. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MECHMAT.2007.03.00610.1016/J.MECHMAT.2007.03.006 ↗
22. Matzenmiller A, Lubliner J, Taylor RL (1995) A constitutive model for anisotropic damage in fiber-composites. Mech Mater 20(2):125–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6636(94)00053-010.1016/0167-6636(94)00053-0 ↗
23. May M, Kilchert S, Hiermaier S (2012) 3D modeling of fracture in brittle isotropic materials using a novel algorithm for the determination of the fracture plane orientation and crack surface area. Finite Elem Anal Des 56:32–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FINEL.2012.03.00110.1016/J.FINEL.2012.03.001 ↗
24. Millen SLJ, Ullah Z, Falzon BG (2021) On the importance of finite element mesh alignment along the fibre direction for modelling damage in fibre-reinforced polymer composite laminates. Compos Struct 278:114694. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPSTRUCT.2021.11469410.1016/J.COMPSTRUCT.2021.114694 ↗
25. Oliver J (1989) A consistent characteristic length for smeared cracking models. Int J Numer Meth Eng 28(2):461–474. https://doi.org/10.1002/NME.162028021410.1002/NME.1620280214 ↗
26. Pinho ST, Iannucci L, Robinson P (2006) Physically based failure models and criteria for laminated fibre-reinforced composites with emphasis on fibre kinking. Part II: FE implementation. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf 37(5):766–777. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPOSITESA.2005.06.00810.1016/J.COMPOSITESA.2005.06.008 ↗
27. Puck A, Kopp J, Knops M (2002) Guidelines for the determination of the parameters in Puck’s action plane strength criterion. Compos Sci Technol 62(3):371–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00202-010.1016/S0266-3538(01)00202-0 ↗
28. Puck A, Schürmann H (2004) Failure analysis of FRP laminates by means of physically based phenomenological models. In: Failure criteria in fibre-reinforced-polymer composites, pp 832–876. Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008044475-8/50028-710.1016/B978-008044475-8/50028-7 ↗
29. Reinoso J, Catalanotti G, Blázquez A, Areias P, Camanho PP, París F (2017a) A consistent anisotropic damage model for laminated fiber-reinforced composites using the 3D-version of the Puck failure criterion. Int J Solids Struct 126–127:37–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJSOLSTR.2017.07.02310.1016/J.IJSOLSTR.2017.07.023 ↗
30. Rezasefat M, Amico SC, Giglio M, Manes A (2022) A Numerical Study on the Influence of Strain Rate in Finite-Discrete Element Simulation of the Perforation Behaviour of Woven Composites. Polymers 14(20):4279. https://doi.org/10.3390/POLYM1420427910.3390/POLYM14204279 ↗
31. Rezasefat M, Gonzalez-Jimenez A, Giglio M, Manes A (2021a) An evaluation of Cuntze and Puck inter fibre failure criteria in simulation of thin CFRP plates subjected to low velocity impact. Compos Struct 1:114654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11465410.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114654 ↗
32. Rezasefat M, Gonzalez-Jimenez A, Giglio M, Manes A (2021b) Numerical study on the dynamic progressive failure due to low-velocity repeated impacts in thin CFRP laminated composite plates. Thin-Walled Struct 167:108220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2021.10822010.1016/j.tws.2021.108220 ↗
33. Rezasefat M, Mostafavi Y, Ma D, Manes A (2023) A hybrid micro-macro mechanical damage model to consider the influence of resin-rich zones on the transverse tensile behaviour of unidirectional composites. Compos Struct 308:116714. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPSTRUCT.2023.11671410.1016/J.COMPSTRUCT.2023.116714 ↗
34. Rezasefat M, Torres DB, Gonzalez-Jimenez A, Giglio M, Manes A (2021c) A fast fracture plane orientation search algorithm for Puck’s 3D IFF criterion for UD composites. Materials Today Communications 1:102700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.10270010.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.102700 ↗
35. Schnapp RL (1986) Macintosh graphics in Modula-2. 190
36. Shi Y, Swait T, Soutis C (2012) Modelling damage evolution in composite laminates subjected to low velocity impact. Compos Struct 94(9):2902–2913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.03.03910.1016/j.compstruct.2012.03.039 ↗
37. Soden PD, Kaddour AS, Hinton MJ (2004) Recommendations for designers and researchers resulting from the world-wide failure exercise. In: Failure criteria in fibre-reinforced-polymer composites. Elsevier Ltd., pp 1223–1251 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008044475-8/50039-110.1016/B978-008044475-8/50039-1 ↗
38. Sun CT, Rui Y (1990) Orthotropic elasto-plastic behavior of AS4/PEEK thermoplastic composite in compression. Mech Mater 10(1–2):117–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6636(90)90022-810.1016/0167-6636(90)90022-8 ↗
39. Sun CX, Yoon KJ (1991) Characterization of elastic-plastic behavior of AS4/PEEK thermoplastic composite for temperature variation. J Compos Mater 25(10):1297–1313. https://doi.org/10.1177/00219983910250100310.1177/002199839102501003 ↗
40. Tan W, Falzon BG, Chiu LNS, Price M (2015) Predicting low velocity impact damage and Compression-After-Impact (CAI) behaviour of composite laminates. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 71:212–22610.1016/j.compositesa.2015.01.025 ↗
41. Ud Din I, Hao P, Franz G, Panier S (2018) Elastoplastic CDM model based on Puck’s theory for the prediction of mechanical behavior of Fiber Reinforced Polymer (FRP) composites. Compos Struct 201:291–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.06.01010.1016/j.compstruct.2018.06.010 ↗
42. Völkerink O, Petersen E, Koord J, Hühne C (2020) A pragmatic approach for a 3D material model considering elasto-plastic behaviour, damage initiation by Puck or Cuntze and progressive failure of fibre-reinforced plastics. Comput Struct 236:106280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2020.10628010.1016/j.compstruc.2020.106280 ↗
43. Wang F, Wang B, Kong F, Ouyang J, Ma T, Chen Y (2021) Assessment of degraded stiffness matrices for composite laminates under low-velocity impact based on modified characteristic length model. Compos Struct 272:114145. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPSTRUCT.2021.11414510.1016/J.COMPSTRUCT.2021.114145 ↗
44. Yang B, Chen Y, Lee J, Fu K, Li Y (2021) In-plane compression response of woven CFRP composite after low-velocity impact: modelling and experiment. Thin-Walled Structures 158:107186. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TWS.2020.10718610.1016/J.TWS.2020.107186 ↗
45. Yao C, Qi Z, Chen W, Zhang C (2021) Effect of CF/PEEK plasticity behavior on the mechanical performance of interference-fit joint. Polym Compos 42(5):2574–2588. https://doi.org/10.1002/PC.2600310.1002/PC.26003 ↗
46. Yuan Z, Li F, Xue F, He M, Hussain MZ (2014) Analysis of the stress states and interface damage in a particle reinforced composite based on a micromodel using cohesive elements. Mater Sci Eng A 589:288–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MSEA.2013.09.09710.1016/J.MSEA.2013.09.097 ↗
47. Zhang C, Duodu EA, Gu J (2017) Finite element modeling of damage development in cross-ply composite laminates subjected to low velocity impact. Compos Struct 173:219–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPSTRUCT.2017.04.01710.1016/J.COMPSTRUCT.2017.04.017 ↗
48. Zhang F, Lin Y, Wu JA, Zhang Z, Huang Y, Li C, Wang M (2022) Comparison of stacking sequence on the low-velocity impact failure mechanisms and energy dissipation characteristics of CFRP/Al hybrid laminates. Polym Compos 43(8):5544–5562. https://doi.org/10.1002/PC.2686710.1002/PC.26867 ↗
49. Zhou J, Wen P, Wang S (2019) Finite element analysis of a modified progressive damage model for composite laminates under low-velocity impact. Compos Struct 225:111113. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPSTRUCT.2019.11111310.1016/J.COMPSTRUCT.2019.111113 ↗
50. Zhou J, Wen P, Wang S (2020) Numerical investigation on the repeated low-velocity impact behavior of composite laminates. Compos B Eng 185:107771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10777110.1016/j.compositesb.2020.107771 ↗