The systematic nature of regularization error in phase field modeling: implications for crack nucleation and propagation
Source abstract
Abstract
A critical issue in simulating the evolution of a crack using the phase field approach resides in the ability of the model to predict crack nucleation. In this work, we study the impact of the Ambrosio–Tortorelli regularized crack formulation on the phase field model’s ability to represent the phenomena of nucleation and early crack propagation in two-dimensional domains under generic boundary conditions. Through numerical experiments we study the nature of the errors introduced by the crack’s regularization at the early stages of crack propagation and its critical effects on the predictability of the nucleation phenomenon. We also show that the errors introduced through the regularization of the crack are systematic and can be predicted for a broad range of boundary conditions. Both external and internal crack cases are analyzed and the scalability of the error is verified. We then investigate the nature of the error and identify its localization with reference to the crack geometry. We conclude that the classical formulation of phase field is not designed to predict nucleation without affecting the early propagation of the crack.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Numerical methods in engineering · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · Fatigue and fracture mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Alnæs MS, Blechta J, Hake J, Johansson A, Kehlet B, Logg A, Richardson C, Ring J, Rognes ME, Wells GN (2015) The FEniCS project version 1.5. Arch Numer Softw 3(100):9–23
2. Ambrosio L (1989) A compactness theorem for a new class of functions of bounded variation. Boll Un Mat Ital 3B:857–881
3. Ambrosio L (1990) Existence theory for a new class of variational problems. Arch Ration Mech Anal 111:291–32210.1007/BF00376024 ↗
4. Ambrosio L (1995) A new proof of the sbv compactness theorem. Calc Var 3:127–13710.1007/BF01190895 ↗
5. Ambrosio L, Tortorelli VM (1990) Approximation of functionals depending on jumps by elliptic functionals via $${\Gamma }$$-convergence. Commun Pure Appl Math 43:999–103610.1002/cpa.3160430805 ↗
6. Ambrosio L, Fusco N, Pallara D (2000) Functions of bounded variation and free discontinuity problems. Oxford University Press, Oxford10.1093/oso/9780198502456.001.0001 ↗
7. Bellettini G, Coscia A (1994) Discrete approximation of a free discontinuity problem. Numer Funct Anal Optim 15:105–12310.1080/01630569408816562 ↗
8. Bourdin B, Marigo J-J, Maurini C, Sicsic P (2014) Morphogenesis and propagation of complex cracks induced by thermal shocks. Phys Rev Lett 112:01430110.1103/PhysRevLett.112.014301 ↗
9. Braides A (1998) Approximation of free-discontinuity problems. Springer, Berlin10.1007/BFb0097344 ↗
10. Braides A (2002) $$\Gamma $$-Convergence for beginners. Oxford lecture series in mathematics and its applications10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198507840.001.0001 ↗
11. Chambolle A, Giacomini A, Ponsiglione M (2005) Crack initiation in elastic bodies. Ecole Polytechnique. CMAP, Palaiseau
12. Dally T, Weinberg K (2017) The phase-field approach as a tool for experimental validations in fracture mechanics. Continuum Mech Thermodyn 29:947–95610.1007/s00161-015-0443-4 ↗
13. DeGiorgi E (1991) Free discontinuity problems in the calculus of variations. In: Dautray R (ed.) Frontiers in pure and applied mathematics, a collection of papers dedicated to J. L. Lions, pp 55–62. North Holland
14. De Giorgi E, Franzoni T (1975) Su un tipo di convergenza variazionale. Atti Accad Naz Lincei Rend Cl Sci Fis Mat Natur 58:842–850
15. Francfort G, Marigo J (1998) Revisiting brittle fracture as an energy minimization problem. J Mech Phys Solids 46:1319–134210.1016/S0022-5096(98)00034-9 ↗
16. Freddi F (2019) Fracture energy in phase field models. Mech Res Commun 96:29–3610.1016/j.mechrescom.2019.01.009 ↗
17. Griffith A (1921) The phenomena of rupture and flow in solids. Philos Trans R Soc Lond A 221:163–19810.1098/rsta.1921.0006 ↗
18. Irwin GR (1958) Fracture. Springer, Berlin, pp 551–590
19. Kumar A, Bourdin B, Francfort GA, Lopez-Pamies O (2020) Revisiting nucleation in the phase-field approach to brittle fracture. J Mech Phys Solids 142:10402710.1016/j.jmps.2020.104027 ↗
20. Logg A, Mardal K-A, Wells GN et al (2012) Automated solution of differential equations by the finite element method. Springer, Berlin10.1007/978-3-642-23099-8 ↗
21. Miehe C, Welschinger F, Hofacker M (2010) Thermodynamically consistent phase-field models of fracture: variational principles and multi-field FE implementations. Int J Numer Meth Eng 83:1273–131110.1002/nme.2861 ↗
22. Modica L, Mortola S (1977) Un esempio di $$\gamma $$-convergenza. Bollettino della Unione Matematica Italiana 8(14):285–299
23. Nguyen T, Yvonnet J, Bornert M, Chateau C, Sab K, Romani R, Le Roy R (2016) On the choice of parameters in the phase field method for simulating crack initiation with experimental validation. Int J Fracture 197:213–22610.1007/s10704-016-0082-1 ↗
24. Pham K, Ravi-Chandar K, Landis C (2017) Experimental validation of a phase-field model for fracture. Int J Fracture 205:83–10110.1007/s10704-017-0185-3 ↗
25. Tanne’ E, Li T, Bourdin B, Maurini C (2017) Crack nucleation in variational phase-field models of brittle fracture. J Mech Phys Solids 110:80–8910.1016/j.jmps.2017.09.006 ↗
26. The Mathworks Inc. (2016) Partial differential equation toolbox user’s guide. The Mathworks Inc, Natick