journal article·2019-07Open access

A framework for material calibration and deformation predictions applied to additive manufacturing of metals

Steffen Brinckmann

International Journal of Fracture· Volume 218· Issue 1-2

Abstract

Additive manufacturing of metals offers the possibility of net-shape production of topologies that are infeasible by conventional subtractive methods, e.g. milling. However, additive manufacturing of metals posses a high defect density, which necessitates accounting for the larger statistical material variation than in conventional metals. To prevent time-consuming experimental component testing, computational methods are required that account for the topology and metal as well as that precisely predict component failure even for metals with statistically varying properties. Predictions require an automatic and modular evaluation of the possibly large set of material properties and their scatter by employing calibration experiments. In addition, a module for failure and deformation prediction as well as a module for the aggregation of experimental data are required. In this contribution, such a modular framework is presented and the encapsulated and non-structured storage of statistically varying material properties is highlighted. In addition, the framework includes multiple FEM solvers and a multitude of optimizers, which are compared and the objective function is addressed. The approach is employed for the third Sandia Fracture Challenge for which two configurations (homogeneous and heterogeneous material properties) are studied and discussed. The blind-predictions of the verification geometry are used to identify the benefits and drawbacks of the framework.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Advanced machining processes and optimization · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. Bathe K-J (2002) Finite-elemente-methoden, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin10.1007/978-3-642-56078-1 ↗
2. Beremin F, Pineau A, Mudry F, Devaux J-C, D’Escatha Y, Ledermann P (1983) A local criterion for cleavage fracture of a nuclear pressure vessel steel. Metall Trans A 14(11):2277–228710.1007/BF02663302 ↗
3. Boyce BL, Kramer SL, Fang HE, Cordova TE, Neilsen MK, Dion K, Kaczmarowski AK, Karasz E, Xue L, Gross AJ et al (2014) The sandia fracture challenge: blind round robin predictions of ductile tearing. Int J Fract 186(1–2):5–6810.1007/s10704-013-9904-6 ↗
4. Boyce B, Kramer S, Bosiljevac T, Corona E, Moore J, Elkhodary K, Simha C, Williams B, Cerrone A, Nonn A et al (2016) The second sandia fracture challenge: predictions of ductile failure under quasi-static and moderate-rate dynamic loading. Int J Fract 198(1–2):5–10010.1007/s10704-016-0089-7 ↗
5. Brebbia CA, Telles JCF, Wrobel LC (2012) Boundary element techniques: theory and applications in engineering. Springer, Berlin
6. Brinckmann S, Quinkert L (2014) Ductile tearing: applicability of a modular approach using cohesive zones and damage mechanics. Int J Fract 186(1–2):141–15410.1007/s10704-013-9918-0 ↗
7. Broyden CG (1970) The convergence of a class of double-rank minimization algorithms: 2. the new algorithm. IMA J Appl Math 6(3):222–23110.1093/imamat/6.3.222 ↗
8. Carlton HD, Haboub A, Gallegos GF, Parkinson DY, MacDowell AA (2016) Damage evolution and failure mechanisms in additively manufactured stainless steel. Mater Sci Eng A 651:406–41410.1016/j.msea.2015.10.073 ↗
9. Carroll BE, Palmer TA, Beese AM (2015) Anisotropic tensile behavior of ti-6al-4v components fabricated with directed energy deposition additive manufacturing. Acta Mater 87:309–32010.1016/j.actamat.2014.12.054 ↗
10. Cortese L, Genovese K, Nalli F, Rossi M (2017) Inverse material characterization from 360-deg DIC measurements on steel samples. In: Yoshida S, Lamberti L, Sciammarella C (eds) Advancement of optical methods in experimental mechanics, vol 3. Conference proceedings of the society for experimental mechanics series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41600-7_3010.1007/978-3-319-41600-7_30 ↗
11. Fletcher R (1970) A new approach to variable metric algorithms. Comput J 13(3):317–32210.1093/comjnl/13.3.317 ↗
12. Frazier WE (2014) Metal additive manufacturing: a review. J Mater Eng Perform 23(6):1917–192810.1007/s11665-014-0958-z ↗
13. Gao X, Ruggieri C, Dodds R (1998) Calibration of weibull stress parameters using fracture toughness data. Int J Fract 92(2):175–20010.1023/A:1007521530191 ↗
14. Goldfarb D (1970) A family of variable-metric methods derived by variational means. Math Comput 24(109):23–2610.1090/S0025-5718-1970-0258249-6 ↗
15. Gong H, Rafi K, Gu H, Starr T, Stucker B (2014) Analysis of defect generation in ti-6al-4v parts made using powder bed fusion additive manufacturing processes. Addit Manuf 1:87–9810.1016/j.addma.2014.08.002 ↗
16. Herzog D, Seyda V, Wycisk E, Emmelmann C (2016) Additive manufacturing of metals. Acta Mater 117:371–39210.1016/j.actamat.2016.07.019 ↗
17. Hibbitt D, Karlsson B, Sorensen P (2011) Abaqus 6.11 Documentation. SIMULIA, Dassault Systemes
18. Hill R (1948) A theory of the yielding and plastic flow of anisotropic metals. Proc R Soc Lond Ser A Math Phys Sci 193(1033):281–29710.1098/rspa.1948.0045 ↗
19. Jared BH, Aguilo MA, Beghini LL, Boyce BL, Clark BW, Cook A, Kaehr BJ, Robbins J (2017) Additive manufacturing: toward holistic design. Scr Mater 135:141–14710.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.02.029 ↗
20. Javani HR, Peerlings R, Geers M (2009) Three dimensional modelling of non-local ductile damage: element technology. Int J Mater Form 2:923–92610.1007/s12289-009-0610-x ↗
21. Junker P, Schwarz S, Makowski J, Hackl K (2017) A relaxation-based approach to damage modeling. Contin Mech Thermodyn 29(1):291–31010.1007/s00161-016-0528-8 ↗
22. Kachanov L (2013) Introduction to continuum damage mechanics, vol 10. Springer, Berlin
23. Kharmanda G, Olhoff N, Mohamed A, Lemaire M (2004) Reliability-based topology optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 26(5):295–30710.1007/s00158-003-0322-7 ↗
24. King W, Anderson A, Ferencz R, Hodge N, Kamath C, Khairallah S, Rubenchik A (2015) Laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing of metals; physics, computational, and materials challenges. Appl Phys Rev 2(4):04130410.1063/1.4937809 ↗
25. Kramer SLB et al. (2019) The third sandia fracture challenge: predictions of ductile fracture in additively manufactured metal. Int J Fract. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-019-00361-110.1007/s10704-019-00361-1 ↗
26. Lemaitre J (2012) A course on damage mechanics. Springer, Berlin
27. M. A. R. Corporation (1997) MARC Users Manual
28. Nelder JA, Mead R (1965) A simplex method for function minimization. Comput J 7(4):308–31310.1093/comjnl/7.4.308 ↗
29. Pelletier H, Krier J, Cornet A, Mille P (2000) Limits of using bilinear stress-strain curve for finite element modeling of nanoindentation response on bulk materials. Thin Solid Films 379(1–2):147–15510.1016/S0040-6090(00)01559-5 ↗
30. Pinna C, Lan Y, Kiu M, Efthymiadis P, Lopez-Pedrosa M, Farrugia D (2015) Assessment of crystal plasticity finite element simulations of the hot deformation of metals from local strain and orientation measurements. Int J Plast 73:24–3810.1016/j.ijplas.2015.05.015 ↗
31. Roe K, Siegmund T (2003) An irreversible cohesive zone model for interface fatigue crack growth simulation. Eng Fract Mech 70(2):209–23210.1016/S0013-7944(02)00034-6 ↗
32. Ruciński M, Izzo D, Biscani F (2010) On the impact of the migration topology on the island model. Parallel Comput 36(10–11):555–57110.1016/j.parco.2010.04.002 ↗
33. Schmaling B, Hartmaier A (2012) Determination of plastic material properties by analysis of residual imprint geometry of indentation. J Mater Res 27:2167–217710.1557/jmr.2012.212 ↗
34. Shanno DF (1970) Conditioning of quasi-newton methods for function minimization. Math Comput 24(111):647–65610.1090/S0025-5718-1970-0274029-X ↗
35. Shim S, Jang J-I, Pharr GM (2008) Extraction of flow properties of single-crystal silicon carbide by nanoindentation and finite-element simulation. Acta Mater 56(15):3824–383210.1016/j.actamat.2008.04.013 ↗
36. Storn R, Price K (1997) Differential evolution-a simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces. J Glob Optim 11(4):341–35910.1023/A:1008202821328 ↗
37. Zambaldi C, Yang Y, Bieler TR, Raabe D (2012) Orientation informed nanoindentation of $$\alpha $$ α -titanium: indentation pileup in hexagonal metals deforming by prismatic slip. J Mater Res 27(01):356–36710.1557/jmr.2011.334 ↗