A localization analysis of a non-uniform damage lattice in presence of strength gradient
Source abstract
Abstract
The failure of a non-uniform axial damage chain under uniform tension is studied both with discrete damage mechanics (DDM) and continuum damage mechanics (CDM). It is shown that a micomechanics-based nonlocal CDM model may be built from a DDM formulation, that may include material heterogeneities. DDM is based on a microstructured model consisting in multiples elastic-damage springs, whose elastic yield threshold is variable and depends on the position along the chain. We aim to develop a nonlocal CDM model as a relevant continuous formulation of the lattice DDM system. To do this, we rely upon a continualisation procedure applied to the difference formulation of the lattice problem, which gives us a nonlocal propagating damage model. The boundary conditions of the nonlocal CDM problem are equivalent to a finite length damage cohesive law. Analytical and numerical results show a strong proximity of the discrete and enriched continuous approaches for this heterogeneous bar problem, as well as the effectiveness of the nonlocal damage model to capture the softening localization phenomenon in heterogeneous quasi-brittle fields.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nonlocal and gradient elasticity in micro/nano structures · Numerical methods in engineering · Microstructure and mechanical properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. Andrianov IV, Awrejcewicz J, Weichert D (2010) Improved continuous models for discrete media. Math Probl Eng 2010:1–3510.1155/2010/986242 ↗
2. Askes H, Sluys LJ (2003) A classification of higher-order strain-gradient models in damage mechanics. Arch Appl Mech 73:448–46510.1007/s00419-003-0296-3 ↗
3. Bažant ZP (2005) Scaling of structural strength. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford
4. Bažant ZP (1976) Instability, ductility, and size effect in strain-softening concrete. J Eng Mech Div 102:331–34410.1061/JMCEA3.0002111 ↗
5. Bažant ZP (1984) Imbricate continuum and its variational derivation. J Eng Mech 110:1693–1712. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-939910.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1984)110:12(1693) ↗
6. Challamel N, Picandet V, Pijaudier-Cabot G (2015) From discrete to nonlocal continuum damage mechanics: analysis of a lattice system in bending using a continualized approach. Int J Damage Mech 24:983–101210.1177/1056789514560913 ↗
7. Collins MA (1981) A quasicontinuum approximation for solitons in an atomic chain. Chem Phys Lett 77:342–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-261410.1016/0009-2614(81)80161-3 ↗
8. Delaplace A, Pijaudier-Cabot G, Roux S (1996) Progressive damage in discrete models and consequences on continuum modelling. J Mech Phys Solids 44:99–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-509610.1016/0022-5096(95)00062-3 ↗
9. Hérisson B, Challamel N, Picandet V, Perrot A, Wang CM (2018) On the static and dynamic behavior of microstructured membranes within nonlocal mechanics. J Eng Mech 144(1):0401715510.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001379 ↗
10. Jaberolanssar H, Peddieson J (1981) On continuum representation of mechanical behavior of discrete lattices. Mech Res Commun 8:251–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-641310.1016/0093-6413(81)90062-8 ↗
11. Kruskal MD, Zabusky NJ (1964) Stroboscopic-perturbation procedure for treating a class of nonlinear wave equations. J Math Phys 5:23110.1063/1.1704113 ↗
12. Luo W, Bažant ZP (2017) Fishnet statistics for probabilistic strength and scaling of nacreous imbricated lamellar materials. J Mech Phys Solids 109:264–28710.1016/j.jmps.2017.07.023 ↗
13. Mariano PM, Trovalusci P (1999) Constitutive relations for elastic microcracked bodies: from a lattice model to a multifield continuum description. Int J Damage Mech 8:153–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/10567895990080020410.1177/105678959900800204 ↗
14. Marigo JJ (1981) Formulation d’une loi d’endommagement d’un matériau élastique. CR Acad Sci Paris II 292:1309–1312
15. Picandet V, Hérisson B, Challamel N, Perrot A (2016) On the failure of a discrete axial chain using a continualized nonlocal continuum damage mechanics approach. Int J Numer Anal Meth Geomech 40:436–46610.1002/nag.2412 ↗
16. Pijaudier-Cabot G, Bažant Z (1987) Nonlocal damage theory. J Eng Mech 113:1512–1533. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-939910.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1987)113:10(1512) ↗
17. Rinaldi A (2013) Bottom-up modeling of damage in heterogeneous quasi-brittle solids. Contin Mech Thermodyn 25:359–373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00161-012-0265-610.1007/s00161-012-0265-6 ↗
18. Rinaldi A, Lai Y-C (2007) Statistical damage theory of 2D lattices: energetics and physical foundations of damage parameter. Int J Plast 23:1796–1825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2007.03.00510.1016/j.ijplas.2007.03.005 ↗
19. Rosenau P (1986) Dynamics of nonlinear mass-spring chains near the continuum limit. Phys Lett A 118:222–22710.1016/0375-9601(86)90170-2 ↗
20. Sun G, Poh LH (2016) Homogenization of intergranular fracture towards a transient gradient damage model. J Mech Phys Solids 95:374–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2016.05.03510.1016/j.jmps.2016.05.035 ↗
21. Triantafyllidis N, Bardenhagen S (1993) On higher order gradient continuum theories in 1-D nonlinear elasticity. Derivation from and comparison to the corresponding discrete models. J Elast 33:259–29310.1007/BF00043251 ↗
22. Wood RH (1968) Some controversial and curious developments in the plastic theory of structures. In: Heyman J, Leckie FA (eds) Engineering plasticity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge