journal article·2009-11

Modelling the failure behaviour of brittle or quasi-brittle materials by analysing the growth of micro-cracks

X. B. Zhang, J. Li, S. E. Boukha

International Journal of Fracture· Volume 160· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

In order to better understand the failure behaviour of brittle or quasi-brittle materials, we developed a numerical model to analyse the creation of a main macro-crack from a large number of micro-cracks. The boundary element method is used to simulate numerically the formation of a main macro-crack by the growth and the coalescence of the micro-cracks. Different two-dimensional panels in PMMA with initial micro-cracks are studied. The macroscopic responses of the panels are observed by simulating the damage process induced by the growth of micro-cracks. The ultimate tensile stress of the material can be then determined. The material toughness heterogeneity is taken into account in the developed model. The toughness heterogeneity is considered as existence of different energy barriers for the growth of micro-cracks. The influences of different parameters such as the level of local stress concentration, the density and the initial length of micro-cracks and the toughness heterogeneity on the failure behaviour of the materials are also studied. The numerical results show that the present model is realistic and efficient. It can be used to describe brittle or quasi-brittle material failure due to the creation of a main macro-crack from micro-cracks.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Numerical methods in engineering · Rock Mechanics and Modeling · Fatigue and fracture mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. Bazant ZP (1976) Instability, ductility and size effect in strain softening concrete. J Eng Mech Div ASCE 102: 331–34410.1061/JMCEA3.0002111 ↗
2. Bazant ZP, Cedolin L (1979) Blunt crack band propagation in finite element analysis. J Eng Mech Div-ASCE 105: 297–31510.1061/JMCEA3.0002467 ↗
3. Bolander JE, Saito S (1998) Fracture analyses using spring networks with random geometry. Eng Fract Mech 61: 569–59110.1016/S0013-7944(98)00069-1 ↗
4. Carpinteri A, Chiaia B (1996) Crack-resistance behavior as a consequence of self-similar fracture topologies. Int J Fract 76: 327–34010.1007/BF00039781 ↗
5. Carpinteri A, Chiaia B (1997) Multifractal scaling laws in the breaking behaviour of disordered materials. Chaos Solitons Fractals 8: 135–15010.1016/S0960-0779(96)00088-4 ↗
6. Carpinteri A, Yang GP (1997) Size effects in brittle specimen with micro crack interaction. Comput Struct 63: 429–43710.1016/S0045-7949(96)00362-8 ↗
7. Carpinteri A, Ciola F, Pugno N (2001) Boundary element method for the strain-softening response of quasi-brittle materials in compression. Comput Struct 79: 389–40110.1016/S0045-7949(00)00149-8 ↗
8. Crouch SL, Starfield AM (1983) Boundary element methods in solid mechanics. George Allen and Unwin, London
9. Cruse TA (1988) Boundary element analysis in computational fracture mechanics. Kluwer, Dordrecht10.1007/978-94-009-1385-1 ↗
10. Erdogan F, Sih GC (1963) On the crack extension in plates under plane loading and transverse shear. Trans ASME J Basic Eng 85: 519–52710.1115/1.3656897 ↗
11. Irwin G (1968) Linear fracture mechanics, fracture transition and fracture control. Eng Fract Mech 1: 241–25710.1016/0013-7944(68)90001-5 ↗
12. Kachanov M (1995) Elastic solids with many cracks and related problems. Adv Appl Mech 30: 260–287
13. Kachanov LM (1958) Time of the rupture process under creep conditions. Izv Akad Nauk SSR Otd Tech Nauk 8: 26–31
14. Kane JH (1994) Boundary element analysis in engineering continuum mechanics. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs
15. Lemaître J, Chaboche JL (1985) Mécanique des Matériaux Solides. Dunod, Paris
16. Li J, Zhang XB (2006) A criterion study for non-singular stress concentrations in brittle or quasi brittle materials. Eng Fract Mech 73: 505–52310.1016/j.engfracmech.2005.09.001 ↗
17. Li J, Zhang XB (2005) A criterion study for non-singular stress concentrations with size effect. Strength Fract Complex 3: 205–21510.3233/SFC-2005-060 ↗
18. Lilliu G, van Mier JGM (2003) 3D lattice type fracture model for concrete. Eng Fract Mech 70: 927–94110.1016/S0013-7944(02)00158-3 ↗
19. Liu Y (2006) A new fast multipole boundary element method for solving large-scale two-dimensional elastostatic problems. Int J Numer Methods Eng 65: 863–88110.1002/nme.1474 ↗
20. Liu JX, Deng SC, Zhang J, Liang NG (2007) Lattice type of fracture model for concrete. Theor Appl Fract Mech 48: 269–28410.1016/j.tafmec.2007.08.008 ↗
21. Mukherjee S (1982) Boundary element methods in creep and fracture. Applied Science Publishers, New York
22. Nishimura N (2002) Fast multipole accelerated boundary integral equation methods. Appl Mech Rev 55(4): 299–32410.1115/1.1482087 ↗
23. Ostoja-Starzewski M (2002) Lattice models in micromechanics. Appl Mech Rev 55: 35–6010.1115/1.1432990 ↗
24. Rizzo FJ (1967) An integral equation approach to boundary value problems of classical elastostatics. Q Appl Math 25: 83–9510.1090/qam/99907 ↗
25. Weibull W (1939) A statistical theory for the strength of materials. Swedish Royal Institute for Engineering Research, Stockholm
26. Zhang XB, Li J (2008) A failure criterion for brittle or quasi-brittle materials under any level of stress concentration. Eng Fract Mech 75(17): 4925–493210.1016/j.engfracmech.2008.06.020 ↗