journal article·2015-04Open access

Modeling rapidly growing cracks in planar materials with a view to micro structural effects

J. Persson, P. Isaksson

International Journal of Fracture· Volume 192· Issue 2

Abstract

Dynamic fracture behavior in both fairly continuous materials and discontinuous cellular materials is analyzed using a hybrid particle model. It is illustrated that the model remarkably well captures the fracture behavior observed in experiments on fast growing cracks reported elsewhere. The material’s microstructure is described through the configuration and connectivity of the particles and the model’s sensitivity to a perturbation of the particle configuration is judged. In models describing a fairly homogeneous continuous material, the microstructure is represented by particles ordered in rectangular grids, while for models describing a discontinuous cellular material, the microstructure is represented by particles ordered in honeycomb grids having open cells. It is demonstrated that small random perturbations of the grid representing the microstructure results in scatter in the crack growth velocity. In materials with a continuous microstructure, the scatter in the global crack growth velocity is observable, but limited, and may explain the small scattering phenomenon observed in experiments on high-speed cracks in e.g. metals. A random perturbation of the initially ordered rectangular grid does however not change the average macroscopic crack growth velocity estimated from a set of models having different grid perturbations and imply that the microstructural discretization is of limited importance when predicting the global crack behavior in fairly continuous materials. On the other hand, it is shown that a similar perturbation of honeycomb grids, representing a material with a discontinuous cellular microstructure, result in a considerably larger scatter effect and there is also a clear shift towards higher crack growth velocities as the perturbation of the initially ordered grid become larger. Thus, capturing the discontinuous microstructure well is important when analyzing growing cracks in cellular or porous materials such as solid foams or wood.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Numerical methods in engineering · Rock Mechanics and Modeling · Landslides and related hazards

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. Bathe KJ (2006) Finite element procedures. Prentice-Hall, Pearson education Inc, New Jersy
2. Belytschko T, Gracie R, Ventura G (2009) A review of extended/generalized finite element method for material modeling. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 17:04300110.1088/0965-0393/17/4/043001 ↗
3. Bolander JE, Saito S (1998) Fracture analysis using spring networks with random geometry. Eng Fract Mech 61:569–59110.1016/S0013-7944(98)00069-1 ↗
4. Cromer A (1981) Stable solutions using the Euler approximation. Am J Phys 49:455–45910.1119/1.12478 ↗
5. Fahrenthold EP, Horban AB (2001) An improved hybrid particle-element method for hypervelocity impact simulation. Int J Impact Eng 26:169–17810.1016/S0734-743X(01)00079-3 ↗
6. Freund LB (1998) Dynamic fracture mechanics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
7. Gao H (1996) A theory of local limiting speed in dynamic fracture. J Mech Phys Solids 44:1453–147410.1016/0022-5096(96)00038-5 ↗
8. Gehlen PC, Popelar CH, Kanninen I (1987) Modeling of dynamic crack propagation: I. validation for one-dimensional analysis. Int J Fract 15:281–29410.1007/BF00033225 ↗
9. Gerstle W, Sau N, Silling S (2007) Peridynamic modeling of concrete structures. Nucl Eng Des 237:1250–125810.1016/j.nucengdes.2006.10.002 ↗
10. Griffith AA (1920) The phenomena of rupture and flow in solids. Philos Trans R Soc Lond A 221:163–19810.1098/rsta.1921.0006 ↗
11. Ha YD, Bobaru F (2010) Studies of dynamic crack propagation and crack branching with peridynamics. Int J Fract 162:229–24410.1007/s10704-010-9442-4 ↗
12. Hrennikoff A (1941) Solution of problems of elasticity by the framework method. J Appl Mech 8(4):A169–A17510.1115/1.4009129 ↗
13. Kanninen MF (1974) A dynamic analysis of unstable crack propagation and arrest in the DCB test specimen. Int J Fract 10:415–43010.1007/BF00035502 ↗
14. Krenk S (2009) Non-linear modeling and analysis of solids and structures. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge10.1017/CBO9780511812163 ↗
15. Marder M, Liu X (1993) Instability in lattice fracture. Phys Rev Lett 71:2417–242010.1103/PhysRevLett.71.2417 ↗
16. Monteiro Azevedo N, Lemos JV (2006) Hybrid discrete element/finite element method for fracture analysis. Appl Mech Eng 195:4579–459310.1016/j.cma.2005.10.005 ↗
17. Mos N, Dolbow J, Belytschko T (1999) A finite element method for crack growth without remeshing. Int J Numer Method Eng 46:131–15010.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19990910)46:1<131::AID-NME726>3.0.CO;2-J ↗
18. Nilsson F (2001) Fracture mechanics—form theory to applications. Fingraf, Södertälje
19. Nilsson F (1974) Crack propagation experiments on strip specimens. Eng Fract Mech 6:397–40310.1016/0013-7944(74)90035-6 ↗
20. Ooi ET, Yang ZJ (2011) Modelling dynamic crack propagation using the scaled boundary finite element method. Int J Numer Methods Eng 88:329–34910.1002/nme.3177 ↗
21. Ostoja-Starzewski M, Sheng PY, Alzebdeh K (1996) Spring Network models in elasticity and fracture of composites and polycrystals. Comput Mater Sci 7:82–9310.1016/S0927-0256(96)00064-X ↗
22. Persson J, Isaksson P (2013) A particlebased method for mechanical analyses of planar fiber-based materials. Int J Numer Methods Eng 93:1216–123410.1002/nme.4428 ↗
23. Persson J, Isaksson P (2014) A mechanical model for rapid deformation and fracture in 3D fiber materials with ability to handle length effects. Int J Solids Struct 51:2244–225110.1016/j.ijsolstr.2014.02.031 ↗
24. Popelar CH, Gehlen PC (1987) Modeling of dynamic crack propagation: II. Validation of two-dimensional analysis. Int J Fract 15:159–17710.1007/BF00037831 ↗
25. Rabb RJ, Fahrenthold EP (2010) Impact dynamics simulation for multilayer fabrics. Int J Numer Methods Eng 83:537–55710.1002/nme.2841 ↗
26. Ramulu M, Kobayashi AS (1985) Mechanics of crack curving and branshing—a dynamic fracture analysis. Int J Fract 27:187–20110.1007/BF00017967 ↗
27. Reissner E (1972) On one-dimensional finite-strain beam theory: the plane problem. J Appl Math Phys 32:795–80410.1007/BF01602645 ↗
28. Silling SA, Bobaru F (2005) Peridynamic modeling of membranes and fibers. Int J Non-Linear mech 40:395–40910.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2004.08.004 ↗
29. Silling SA, Askari E (2005) A meshfree method based on the peridynamics model of solid mechanics. Comput Struct 83:1526–153510.1016/j.compstruc.2004.11.026 ↗
30. Suiker ASJ, Metrikine AV, de Borst R (2001) Comparison of wave propagation characteristics of the Cosserat continuum model and corresponding discrete lattice models. Int J Solids Struct 28:1563–158310.1016/S0020-7683(00)00104-9 ↗
31. Wang G, Al-Ostaz A, Cheng AH-D, Mantena PR (2009) Hybrid lattice particle modeling: theoretical considerations for a 2D elastic spring network for dynamic fractrue simulations. Comput Mater Sci 44:1126–113410.1016/j.commatsci.2008.07.032 ↗
32. Zang W, Gudmundson P (1988) A boundary intergral method for internal piece-wise smooth crack problems. Int J Fract 38:275–29410.1007/BF00019804 ↗
33. Zehnder AT, Rosakis AJ (1990) Dynamic fracture initiation and propagation in 4340 steel under impact loading. Int J Fract 43:271–28510.1007/BF00035087 ↗
34. Zhang Z, Chen Y (2014) Modeling nonlinear slastic solid with correlated lattice bond cell for dynamic fracture simulation. Compu Methods Appl Mech Eng 279:325–34710.1016/j.cma.2014.06.036 ↗