On the role of triaxiality in mode-I resistance curves
Source abstract
Abstract
Insight into the role of triaxiality in mode-I, plane strain resistance curves of a representative ductile metal has been gained. Growth of a macroscopic crack is simulated as per modified boundary layer formulation for a range of constraint parameter with the fracture process represented by a triaxiality dependent cohesive model. In contrast to the predictions by a fixed cohesive law, the study shows that by including the effect of triaxiality on the work of separation, the stick-slip nature or the non-uniformity in the rate of the crack growth and its manifestations on the plastic wake and fracture surface can be predicted that are closer to trends observed in experimental literature.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Mechanical Behavior of Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. Anvari M, Scheider I, Thaulow C (2006) Simulation of dynamic ductile growth using strain-rate and triaxiality dependent cohesive elements. Eng Fract 73(15):2210–222810.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.03.016 ↗
2. Banerjee A, Manivasagam R (2009) Triaxiality dependent cohesive zone model. Eng Fract Mech 76:1761–177010.1016/j.engfracmech.2009.03.009 ↗
3. Broberg KB (1995) Critical review of some methods in nonlinear fracture mechanics. Eng Fract Mech 50:157–16410.1016/0013-7944(94)00188-N ↗
4. Cornec A, Scheider I, Schwalbe KH (2003) On the practical application of the cohesive model. Eng Fract Mech 70:1963–198710.1016/S0013-7944(03)00134-6 ↗
5. Gao YF, Bower AF (2004) A simple technique for avoiding convergence problems in finite element simulations of crack nucleation and growth on cohesive interfaces. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 12:453–46310.1088/0965-0393/12/3/007 ↗
6. Hancock JW, Reuter WG, Parks DM (1993) Constraint and toughness parameterized by T. ASTM Special Tech Publ 1171:21–21
7. Jha D, Banerjee A (2012) A cohesive model for fatigue failure in complex stress-states. Int J Fat 36(1):155–16210.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.07.015 ↗
8. Needleman A (1987) A continuum model for void nucleation by inclusion debonding. J Appl Mech 54:525–53110.1115/1.3173064 ↗
9. Ostby E, Thaulow C, Zhang ZL (2007) Numerical simulations of specimen size and mismatch effects in ductile crack growthPart I: tearing resistance and crack growth paths. Eng Fract Mech 74(11):1770–179210.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.09.013 ↗
10. Pineau A (2008) Modeling ductile to brittle fracture transition in steels-micromechanical and physical challenges. Int J Fract 150(1–2):129–15610.1007/s10704-008-9232-4 ↗
11. Rashid FM, Banerjee A (2013) Implementation and validation of a triaxiality dependent cohesive model: experiments and simulations. Int J Fract 181(2):227–23910.1007/s10704-013-9837-0 ↗
12. Scheider I, Rajendran M, Banerjee A (2011) Comparison of different stress-state dependent cohesive zone models applied to thin-walled structures. Eng Fract Mech 78(3):534–54310.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.05.003 ↗
13. Siegmund T, Brocks W (1999) Prediction of the work of separation and implications to modeling. Int J Fract 99:97–11610.1023/A:1018300226682 ↗
14. Siegmund T, Brocks W (2000) A numerical study on the correlation between the work of separation and the dissipation rate in ductile fracture. Eng Fract Mech 67:139–15410.1016/S0013-7944(00)00054-0 ↗
15. Stampfl J, Kolednik O (2000) The separation of the fracture energy in metallic materials. Int J Fract 101(4):321–34510.1023/A:1007500325074 ↗
16. Stampfl J, Scherer S, Berchthaler M, Gruber M, Kolednik O (1996) Determination of the fracture toughness by automatic image processing. Int J Fract 78(1):35–4410.1007/BF00018499 ↗
17. Sumpter JDG (1999) An alternative view of R-curve testing. Eng Fract Mech 64:161–17610.1016/S0013-7944(99)00074-0 ↗
18. Tatschl A, Kolednik O (2003) A new tool for the experimental characterization of micro-plasticity. Mat Sci Eng A 339(1):265–28010.1016/S0921-5093(02)00111-9 ↗
19. Turner CE, Kolednik O (1994) A micro and macro approach to the energy dissipation rate model of stable ductile crack growth. Fatig Fract Eng Mater Struct 17:1089–110710.1111/j.1460-2695.1994.tb00837.x ↗
20. Tvergaard V, Hutchinson JW (1992) The relation between crack growth resistance and fracture process parameters in elastic–plastic solids. J Mech Phys Solids 40:1377–139710.1016/0022-5096(92)90020-3 ↗
21. Tvergaard V, Hutchinson JW (1994) Effect of T-stress on mode I crack growth resistance in a ductile solid. Int J Solids Struct 31(6):823–83310.1016/0020-7683(94)90080-9 ↗
22. Varias AG (1998) Constraint effects during stable transient crack growth. Comput Mech 21:316–32910.1007/s004660050308 ↗