Effect of material plasticity on fatigue crack propagation under complex stress state
Source abstract
Abstract
The maximum energy release rate criterion, i.e., G max criterion, is commonly used for crack propagation analysis. However, this fracture criterion is based on the elastic macroscopic strength of materials. In the present investigation, a modification has been made to G max criterion to implement the consideration of the plastic strain energy. This criterion is extended to study the fatigue crack growth characteristics of mixed mode cracks in steel pipes. To predict crack propagation due to fatigue loads, a new elasto-plastic energy model is presented. This new model includes the effects of material properties like strain hardening exponent n, yield strength σy and fracture toughness and stress intensity factor ranges. The results obtained are compared with those obtained using the commonly employed crack growth law and the experimental data.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Fire effects on concrete materials · Material Properties and Failure Mechanisms
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Bian L, Fawaz Z and Behdinan K (2006). A mixed mode crack growth model taking account of fracture surface contact and friction. Int J Fract 139(1): 39–5810.1007/s10704-006-6633-0 ↗
2. Bian L and Lim JK (2003). Fatigue life prediction of the plates with an inclined surface crack. Int J Fatigue 25(6): 521–53110.1016/S0142-1123(02)00172-X ↗
3. Bian L and Soh AK (2002). Influence of effective stress intensity factor range on mixed mode fatigue crack propagation. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 25(4): 349–36210.1046/j.1460-2695.2002.00514.x ↗
4. Broberg KB (1999). Cracks and fracture. Academic Press, San Diego
5. BS 5447 (2000) k1c fracture toughness testing. British Standards Institution
6. Dahlin P and Olsson M (2004). Reduction of mode I fatigue crack growth rate due to occasional mode II loading. Int J Fatigue 26(10): 1083–109310.1016/j.ijfatigue.2004.03.003 ↗
7. Erdogan F and Sih GC (1963). On the crack extension in plates under plane loading and transverse shear. ASME, J Basic Eng 85D: 519–52710.1115/1.3656897 ↗
8. Gillemot LF (1976). Criterion of crack initiation and spreading. Eng Fract Mech 8(1): 239–25310.1016/0013-7944(76)90089-8 ↗
9. Griffith AA (1920). The phenomena of rupture and flow in solids. Trans Royal Soc Lond A-221: 163–198
10. Heyder M, Kolk K and Kuhn G (2005). Numerical and experimental investigations of the influence of corner singularities on 3D fatigue crack propagation. Eng Fract Mech 72(13): 2095–210510.1016/j.engfracmech.2005.01.006 ↗
11. Hussain MA, Pu SL and Underwood J (1974). Strain energy release rate for a crack under combined mode I and mode II. Fract Anal ASTM STP 560: 2–28
12. Irwin GR (1968). Linear fracture mechanics. Eng Fract Mech 1: 241–28710.1016/0013-7944(68)90001-5 ↗
13. Jeong DY (1995). Application of effective stress intensity factor crack closure model to evaluate train load sequence effects on crack growth rates. Theor Appl Fract Mech 22: 43–5010.1016/0167-8442(94)00047-5 ↗
14. Kanazawa T, Machida S and Itoga K (1975). On the effect of cyclic stress ratio on the fatigue crack propagation. Eng Fract Mech 7(3): 445–45510.1016/0013-7944(75)90045-4 ↗
15. Liebowitz H (Rice JR) (1968) Fracture, vol II. Academic Press, New York
16. Lugg MC (1992). An introduction to AC potential drop (ACPD). Technical Software Consultants Ltd., United Kingdom
17. Newman JC Jr, Booth BC, Shivakumar KN (1988) An elastic-plastic finite-element analysis of the J-resistance curve using a CTOD criterion, Fracture Mechanics: Eighteenth Symposium, ASTM STP 945, Philadelphia, USA, pp 665–68510.1520/STP23268S ↗
18. Omer N and Yosibash Z (2005). On the path independency of the point-wise J integral in three-dimensions. Int J Fract 136(1–4): 1–3610.1007/s10704-005-3934-7 ↗
19. Paris PC and Erdogan F (1963). A critical analysis of crack propagation laws. J Basic Eng, Trans ASME, Series D 85: 528–53910.1115/1.3656900 ↗
20. Pilkey WD (1994). Fracture mechanics and fatigue, Formulas for stress, strain and structural matrices. A Wiley-Interscience Publication, USA
21. Qian J and Fatemi A (1996). Fatigue crack growth under mixed mode I, II loading. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 19(10): 1277–128410.1111/j.1460-2695.1996.tb00950.x ↗
22. Richard HA (1985) Compact mixed mode fracture specimens in testing. VDI Forschungsheft 631(1)
23. Schwalbe KH (1974). Comparison of several fatigue crack propagation laws with experimental results. Eng Fract Mech 6(2): 325–34110.1016/0013-7944(74)90031-9 ↗
24. Sih GC (1973). Some basic problems in fracture mechanics and new concepts. Eng Fract Mech 5: 365–37710.1016/0013-7944(73)90027-1 ↗
25. Sih GC (1974). Strain–energy–density factor applied to mixed mode crack problems. Int J Fract 10(3): 305–32110.1007/BF00035493 ↗
26. Sih GC (1975) Three dimensional crack problems. In: Mechanics of Fracture, vol 2. Noordhoff, Netherlands
27. Sih GC and Barthelemy BM (1980). Mixed mode fatigue crack growth predictions. Eng Fract Mech 13: 439–45110.1016/0013-7944(80)90076-4 ↗
28. Simandjuntak S, Alizadeh H, Smith DJ and Pavier MJ (2006). Three dimensional finite element prediction of crack closure and fatigue crack growth rate for a corner crack. Int J Fatigue 28(4): 335–34510.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.07.034 ↗
29. Subramanya HY, Viswanath S and Narasimhan R (2005). A Three-dimensional numerical study of mixed mode (I and II) crack tip fields in elastic–plastic solids. Int J Fract 136(1–4): 167–18510.1007/s10704-005-5422-5 ↗