journal article·2016-03

The Second Blind Sandia Fracture Challenge: improved MBW model predictions for different strain rates

Yidu Di, Junhe Lian, Bo Wu, Napat Vajragupta, Denis Novokshanov, Victoria Brinnel, Benedikt Döbereiner, Markus Könemann, Sebastian Münstermann

International Journal of Fracture· Volume 198· Issue 1-2
Publisher page

Abstract

Sandia National Laboratories have carried out the Sandia Fracture Challenge in order to evaluate ductile damage mechanics models under conditions which are similar to those in the industrial practice. In this challenge, the prediction of load-deformation behavior and crack path of a sample that is designed for the competition under two loading rates is required with given data: the material Ti–6Al–4V, and raw data of tensile tests and V-notch tests under two loading rates. Within the stipulated time frame 14 teams from USA and Europe gave their predictions to the organizer. In this work, the approach applied by Team Aachen is presented in detail. The modified Bai–Wierzbicki (MBW) model is used in the framework of the Second Blind Sandia Fracture Challenge (SFC2). The model is made up by a stress-state dependent plasticity core that is extended to cope with strain rate and temperature effects under adiabatic conditions. It belongs to the group of coupled phenomenological ductile damage mechanics models, but it assumes a strain threshold value for the instant of ductile damage initiation. The initial guess of material parameters for the selected material Ti–6Al–4V was taken from an in-house database available at the authors’ institutes, but parameters are optimized in order to meet the validation data provided. This paper reveals that the model predictions can be improved significantly compared to the original submission of results at the end of SFC2 by two simple measures. On the one hand, the function to express the critical damage as well as the amount of energy dissipation between ductile damage initiation and complete ductile fracture were derived more carefully from the data provided by the challenge’s organizer. On the other hand, the experimental set-up of the challenge experiment was better described in the geometrical representation used for the numerical simulations. These two simple modifications allowed for a precise prediction of crack path and estimation of force–displacement behavior. The improved results show the general ability of the MBW model to predict the strain rate sensitivity of ductile fracture at various states of stress.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Microstructure and mechanical properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (57)

Show source-provided references
1. Bai YL, Wierzbicki T (2008) A new model of metal plasticity and fracture with pressure and Lode dependence. Int J Plast 24:1071–109610.1016/j.ijplas.2007.09.004 ↗
2. Bai YL, Wierzbicki T (2010) Application of extended Mohr–Coulomb criterion to ductile fracture. Int J Fract 161:1–2010.1007/s10704-009-9422-8 ↗
3. Bao Y, Wierzbicki T (2004) On fracture locus in the equivalent strain and stress triaxiality space. Int J Mech Sci 46:81–9810.1016/j.ijmecsci.2004.02.006 ↗
4. Barsoum I, Faleskog J (2007) Rupture mechanisms in combined tension and shear—experiments. Int J Solids Struct 44:1768–178610.1016/j.ijsolstr.2006.09.031 ↗
5. Besson J (2009) Continuum models of ductile fracture: a review. Int J Damage Mech 19:3–5210.1177/1056789509103482 ↗
6. Borvik T, Hopperstad OS, Berstad T, Langseth M (2001) A computational model of viscoplasticity and ductile damage for impact and penetration. Eur J Mech A Solids 20:685–71210.1016/S0997-7538(01)01157-3 ↗
7. Bouchard PO, Bourgeon L, Fayolle S, Mocellin K (2011) An enhanced Lemaitre model formulation for materials processing damage computation. Int J Mater Form 4:299–31510.1007/s12289-010-0996-5 ↗
8. Boyce BL et al (2016) The Second Sandia Fracture Challenge: predictions of ductile failure under quasi-static and moderate-rate dynamic loading. Int J Fract. doi: 10.1007/s10704-016-0089-710.1007/s10704-016-0089-7 ↗
9. Brunig M, Chyra O, Albrecht D, Driemeier L, Alves M (2008) A ductile damage criterion at various stress triaxialities. Int J Plast 24:1731–175510.1016/j.ijplas.2007.12.001 ↗
10. Buchkremer S, Wu B, Lung D, Munstermann S, Klocke F, Bleck W (2014) FE-simulation of machining processes with a new material model. J Mater Process Technol 214:599–61110.1016/j.jmatprotec.2013.10.014 ↗
11. Chow CL, Jie M (2009) Anisotropic damage-coupled sheet metal forming limit analysis. Int J Damage Mech 18:371–39210.1177/1056789508097548 ↗
12. Chow CL, Jie M, Hu SJ (2003) Forming limit analysis of sheet metals based on a generalized deformation theory. J Eng Mater Technol 125:260–26510.1115/1.1586938 ↗
13. Chow CL, Yang XJ (2004) A generalized mixed isotropic–kinematic hardening plastic model coupled with anisotropic damage for sheet metal forming. Int J Damage Mech 13:81–10110.1177/1056789504039258 ↗
14. Chow CL, Yang XJ, Chu E (2001) Effect of principal damage plane rotation on anisotropic damage plastic model. Int J Damage Mech 10:43–5510.1106/6ENW-PLMH-M20N-5TP6 ↗
15. de Souza Neto EA (2002) A fast, one-equation integration algorithm for the Lemaitre ductile damage model. Commun Numer Methods Eng 18:541–55410.1002/cnm.511 ↗
16. Dunand M, Maertens AP, Luo M, Mohr D (2012) Experiments and modeling of anisotropic aluminum extrusions under multi-axial loading—part I: plasticity. Int J Plast 36:34–4910.1016/j.ijplas.2012.03.003 ↗
17. El-Magd E, Treppman C, Korthauer M (2006) Description of flow curves over wide ranges of strain rate and temperature. Int J Mater Res 97:1453–145910.3139/146.101390 ↗
18. Gao X, Zhang G, Roe C (2009) A study on the effect of the stress state on ductile fracture. Int J Damage Mech 19:75–94
19. Gologanu M, Leblond JB, Devaux J (1993) Approximate models for ductile metals containing non-spherical voids—case of axisymmetrical prolate ellipsoidal cavities. J Mech Phys Solids 41:1723–175410.1016/0022-5096(93)90029-F ↗
20. Gologanu M, Leblond JB, Devaux J (1994) Approximate models for ductile metals containing non-spherical voids—case of axisymmetrical oblate ellipsoidal cavities. J Eng Mater Technol Trans ASME 116:290–29710.1115/1.2904290 ↗
21. Gologanu M, Leblond JB, Perrin G, Devaux J (1997) Recent extensions of Gurson’s model for porous ductile metals. In: Suquet P (ed) Continuum micromechanics. Springer, New York, pp 61–13010.1007/978-3-7091-2662-2_2 ↗
22. Gurson AL (1977) Continuum theory of ductile rupture by void nucleation and growth: part I—-yield criteria and flow rules for porous ductile media. J Eng Mater Technol Trans ASME 99:2–1510.1115/1.3443401 ↗
23. Hancock JW, Brown DK (1983) On the role of strain and stress state in ductile failure. J Mech Phys Solids 31:1–2410.1016/0022-5096(83)90017-0 ↗
24. Johnson GR, Cook WH (1985) Fracture characteristics of 3 metals subjected to various strains, strain rates, temperatures and pressures. Eng Fract Mech 21:31–4810.1016/0013-7944(85)90052-9 ↗
25. Kachanov LM (1999) Rupture time under creep conditions. Int J Fract 97:11–1810.1023/A:1018671022008 ↗
26. Kailasam M, Castaneda PP (1998) A general constitutive theory for linear and nonlinear particulate media with microstructure evolution. J Mech Phys Solids 46:427–46510.1016/S0022-5096(97)00095-1 ↗
27. Lemaitre J (1984) How to use damage mechanics. Nucl Eng Des 80:233–24510.1016/0029-5493(84)90169-9 ↗
28. Lemaitre J (1985) A continuous damage mechanics model for ductile fracture. J Eng Mater Technol Trans ASME 107:83–8910.1115/1.3225775 ↗
29. Lemaitre J (1992) A course on damage mechanics. Springer, Berlin10.1007/978-3-662-02761-5 ↗
30. Lian J, Sharaf M, Archie F, Münstermann S (2013) A hybrid approach for modelling of plasticity and failure behaviour of advanced high-strength steel sheets. Int J Damage Mech 22:188–21810.1177/1056789512439319 ↗
31. Lian J, Wu J, Munstermann S (2015) Evaluation of the cold formability of high-strength low-alloy steel plates with the modified Bai–Wierzbicki damage model. Int J Damage Mech 24:383–41710.1177/1056789514537587 ↗
32. Lian J, Yang H, Vajragupta N, Münstermann S, Bleck W (2014) A method to quantitatively upscale the damage initiation of dual-phase steels under various stress states from microscale to macroscale. Comput Mater Sci 94:245–25710.1016/j.commatsci.2014.05.051 ↗
33. Lou Y, Yoon JW, Huh H, Archie F (2013) Modeling of shear ductile fracture considering a changeable cut-off value for stress triaxiality. Int J Plast 54:56–8010.1016/j.ijplas.2013.08.006 ↗
34. Lubarda VA, Krajcinovic D (1995) Some fundamental issues in rate theory of damage-elastoplasticity. Int J Plast 11:763–79710.1016/S0749-6419(95)00029-1 ↗
35. Luo M, Dunand M, Mohr D (2012) Experiments and modeling of anisotropic aluminum extrusions under multi-axial loading—part II: ductile fracture. Int J Plast 32–33:36–5810.1016/j.ijplas.2011.11.001 ↗
36. Maire E, Bouaziz O, Di Michiel M, Verdu C (2008) Initiation and growth of damage in a dual-phase steel observed by X-ray microtomography. Acta Mater 56:4954–496410.1016/j.actamat.2008.06.015 ↗
37. McClintock FA (1968) A criterion for ductile fracture by growth of holes. J Appl Mech 35:363–37110.1115/1.3601204 ↗
38. Mirone G, Corallo D (2010) A local viewpoint for evaluating the influence of stress triaxiality and Lode angle on ductile failure and hardening. Int J Plast 26:348–37110.1016/j.ijplas.2009.07.006 ↗
39. Muenstermann S, Schruff C, Lian J, Dobereiner B, Brinnel V, Wu B (2013) Predicting lower bound damage curves for high-strength low-alloy steels. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 36:779–79410.1111/ffe.12046 ↗
40. Münstermann S, Lian J, Bleck W (2012a) Design of damage tolerance in high-strength steels. Int J Mater Res 103:755–76410.3139/146.110697 ↗
41. Münstermann S, Sharaf M, Lian J, Golisch G (2012b) Exploiting the property profile of high strength steels by damage mechanics approaches. Mater Test 54:557–56310.3139/120.110363 ↗
42. Nahshon K, Hutchinson JW (2008) Modification of the Gurson model for shear failure. Eur J Mech A Solids 27:1–1710.1016/j.euromechsol.2007.08.002 ↗
43. Niazi MS, Wisselink HH, Meinders T, Huetink J (2012) Failure predictions for DP steel cross-die test using anisotropic damage. Int J Damage Mech 21:713–75410.1177/1056789511407646 ↗
44. Niazi MS, Wisselink HH, Meinders VT, van den Boogaard AH (2013) Material-induced anisotropic damage in DP600. Int J Damage Mech 22:1039–107010.1177/1056789512468914 ↗
45. Nielsen KL, Tvergaard V (2009) Effect of a shear modified Gurson model on damage development in a FSW tensile specimen. Int J Solids Struct 46:587–60110.1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.09.011 ↗
46. Nielsen KL, Tvergaard V (2010) Ductile shear failure or plug failure of spot welds modelled by modified Gurson model. Eng Fract Mech 77:1031–104710.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.02.031 ↗
47. Novokshanov D, Dobereiner B, Sharaf M, Munstermann S, Lian JH (2015) A new model for upper shelf impact toughness assessment with a computationally efficient parameter identification algorithm. Eng Fract Mech 148:281–30310.1016/j.engfracmech.2015.07.069 ↗
48. Pack K, Roth CC (2016) The second sandia fracture challenge: blind prediction of dynamic shear localization and full fracture characterization. Int J Fract. doi: 10.1007/s10704-016-0091-010.1007/s10704-016-0091-0 ↗
49. Rice JR, Tracey DM (1969) On ductile enlargement of voids in triaxial stress fields. J Mech Phys Solids 17:201–21710.1016/0022-5096(69)90033-7 ↗
50. Teng X (2008) Numerical prediction of slant fracture with continuum damage mechanics. Eng Fract Mech 75:2020–204110.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.11.001 ↗
51. Tvergaard V (1981) Influence of voids on shear band instabilities under plane-strain conditions. Int J Fract 17:389–40710.1007/BF00036191 ↗
52. Tvergaard V (1982) On localization in ductile materials containing spherical voids. Int J Fract 18:237–25210.1007/BF00015686 ↗
53. Tvergaard V, Needleman A (1984) Analysis of the cup-cone fracture in a round tensile bar. Acta Metall 32:157–16910.1016/0001-6160(84)90213-X ↗
54. Voyiadjis GZ, Deliktas B (2000) Multi-scale analysis of multiple damage mechanisms coupled with inelastic behavior of composite materials. Mech Res Commun 27:295–30010.1016/S0093-6413(00)00095-1 ↗
55. Voyiadjis GZ, Park T (1999) The kinematics of damage for finite-strain elasto-plastic solids. Int J Eng Sci 37:803–83010.1016/S0020-7225(98)00100-1 ↗
56. Xue L (2008) Constitutive modeling of void shearing effect in ductile fracture of porous materials. Eng Fract Mech 75:3343–336610.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.07.022 ↗
57. Zerilli FJ, Armstrong RW (1987) Dislocation-mechanics-based constitutive relations for material dynamics calculations. J Appl Phys 61:1816–1825. doi: 10.1063/1.33802410.1063/1.338024 ↗