Compression–After–Impact Strength and Surface Morphology in Toughened Composite Materials
Source abstract
Abstract
Interleaved toughening is a promising approach of improving fracture toughness in composites. Past observations of toughened particles have been conducted using the Optical Microscopy or Scanning Electron Microscopy for localized microstructures at a specific location; however, these methods may not be able to provide a 3–D, birds–eye view of the global particle distribution on a composite interlaminar surface. In this paper, we discovered an interesting optical phenomenon which can be used to observe surface morphology in toughened composites. This novel optical technique is able to reveal the detailed morphological information of toughened particles and individual fibers, including particle distribution uniformity, particle size variation, and fiber misalignment. It was found that particle distribution uniformity is a critical factor in differentiating the high and low Compression–After–Impact (CAI) laminates. High–CAI laminate had uniform and denser particle distribution, whereas low–CAI laminate had very non–uniform particle distribution.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Polymer crystallization and properties · Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (12)
Show source-provided references
1. Chou I., Inutake T., Namba K. (1999) Correlation of damage resistance under low velocity impact and mode II delamination resistance in CFRP laminates. Advanced Composite Materials 8: 167–17610.1163/156855199X00173 ↗
2. Daniel I.M., Hsiao H.M. (1999) Is there a thickness effect on compressive strength of unnotched composite laminates?. Inernational Journal of Fracture 95: 143–15810.1023/A:1018692032303 ↗
3. Derkowski B.J., Sue H.J. (2003) Morphology and compression–after–impact strength relationship in interleaved toughened composites. Polymer Composites 24: 158–17010.1002/pc.10016 ↗
4. Hojo M., Ando T., Tanaka M., Adachi T., Ochiai S., Endo Y. (2006) Modes I and II interlaminar fracture toughness and fatigue delamination of CF/epoxy laminates with self-same epoxy interleaf. International Journal of Fatigue 28: 1154–116510.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.02.004 ↗
5. Hsiao H.M., Chiu Y.H., Lee K.H., Lin C.H. (2012) Computational modeling of effects of intravascular stent design on key mechanical and hemodynamic behavior. Computer–Aided Design 44: 757–76510.1016/j.cad.2012.03.009 ↗
6. Hsiao H.M. (2012) Why similar stent designs cause new clinical issues?. Journal of the American College of Cardiology: Cardiovascular Interventions 5: 362–36310.1016/j.jcin.2012.01.010 ↗
7. Hsiao H.M., Daniel I.M. (1996) Effect of fiber waviness on stiffness and strength reduction of unidirectional composites under compressive loading. Composites Science and Technology 56: 581–59310.1016/0266-3538(96)00045-0 ↗
8. Launey M.E., Ritchie R.O. (2009) On the fracture toughness of advanced materials. Advanced Materials 21: 2103–211010.1002/adma.200803322 ↗
9. Lee S.M. (1997) Mode II delamination failure mechanisms of polymer matrix composites. Journal of Materials Science 32: 1287–129510.1023/A:1018552506085 ↗
10. Tsotsis T.K. (2009) Interlayer toughening of composite materials. Polymer Composites 30: 70–8610.1002/pc.20535 ↗
11. Wang H., Vu–Khanh T. (1998) Low–velocity impact damage in laminated composite materials. Key Engeering Materials 141–143: 277–30410.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.141-143.277 ↗
12. White K.L., Sue H.J. (2012) Delamination toughness of fiber–reinforced composites containing a carbon nanotube/polyamide–12 epoxy thin film interlayer. Polymer 53: 37–4210.1016/j.polymer.2011.11.022 ↗