journal article·2011-10Open access

How the obscuration-zone hypothesis affects fragmentation: Illustration with the cohesive-element method

M. Chambart, S. Levy, J. F. Molinari

International Journal of Fracture· Volume 171· Issue 2

Abstract

The problem of fragmentation prediction is at the origin of various analytical models. Among them, we focus on the ones introducing the idea of obscured zones. They assume that when a crack initiates at a defect, a stress release wave propagates away from the crack and protects the region encompassed by the wave from any further crack initiation. In this paper, we show by the use of numerical simulations that this assumption is only valid at high strain rates. The limit of its accuracy is even pushed to higher strain rates when the fragmentation process becomes more complex, that is to say when crack propagation, bifurcation or coalescence together with wave reflections are implied. In these cases, fragmentation lasts longer than the time needed to completely obscure the whole specimen and the obscured zone theory for fragmentation appears inadequate. We use the cohesive-element method to describe the damage and failure of the material considered.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Rock Mechanics and Modeling · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. Astrom JA, Linna RP, Timonen J, Moller PF, Oddershede L (2004) Exponential and power-law mass distributions in brittle fragmentation. Phys Rev E 70(2): 02610410.1103/PhysRevE.70.026104 ↗
2. Camacho GT, Ortiz M (1996) Computational modelling of impact damage in brittle materials. Int J Solids Struct 3(20–22): 2899–293810.1016/0020-7683(95)00255-3 ↗
3. Denoual C, Barbier G, Hild FA (1997) Probabilistic approach for fragmentation of ceramics under impact loading. C.R. Acad Sci Paris IIb 325: 685–691
4. Donzé FV, Bouchez J, Magnier SA (1997) Modeling fractures in rock blasting. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 34(8): 1153–116310.1016/S1365-1609(97)80068-8 ↗
5. Drugan WJ (2001) Dynamic fragmentation of brittle materials: analytical mechanics-based models. J Mech Phys Solids 49(6): 1181–120810.1016/S0022-5096(01)00002-3 ↗
6. Forquin P, Hild F (2010) A probabilistic damage model of the dynamic fragmentation process in brittle materials. Adv Appl Mech 44: 1–7210.1016/S0065-2156(10)44001-6 ↗
7. Glenn LA, Chudnovsky A (1986) Strain-energy effects on dynamic fragmentation. J Appl Phys 59: 1379–138010.1063/1.336532 ↗
8. Grady DE, Kipp ME (1985) Geometric statistics and dynamic fragmentation. J Appl Phys 83(3): 1210–122210.1063/1.336139 ↗
9. Grady DE (2006) Fragmentation of rings and shells: the legacy of N.F. Mott. Springer, Berlin10.1007/b138675 ↗
10. Grady DE, Kipp ME, Benson DA (1984) Energy and statistical effects in the dynamic fragmentation of metal rings. Proc Conf Mech Prop High Rates Strain 70: 315–320
11. Grady DE (1982) Local inertial effects in dynamic fragmentation. J Appl Phys 53(1): 322–32510.1063/1.329934 ↗
12. Herrman HJ, Wittel FK, Kun F (2006) Fragmentation. Physica A 371: 59–6610.1016/j.physa.2006.04.087 ↗
13. Hughes T (2000) The finite element method: linear static and dynamic finite element analysis. Dover Publications, New York
14. Kipp ME, Grady DE (1985) Dynamic fracture growth and interaction in one dimension. J Mech Phys Solids 33(4): 399–41510.1016/0022-5096(85)90036-5 ↗
15. Levy S, Molinari JF (2010) Dynamic fragmentation of ceramics, signature of defects and scaling of fragment sizes. J Mech Phys Solids 58(1): 12–2610.1016/j.jmps.2009.09.002 ↗
16. Levy S, Molinari JF, Radovitzky R (2011) Dynamic fragmentation of a brittle plate under biaxial loading: strength or toughness controlled? Int J Numer Methods Eng (submitted)10.1007/s10704-012-9691-5 ↗
17. Lienau CC (1936) Random fracture for brittle solid. J Franklin Inst 221:485–49410.1016/S0016-0032(36)90309-5 ↗
18. Maiti S, Rangaswamy K, Philippe H, Geubelle PH (2004) Mesoscale analysis of dynamic fragmentation of ceramics under tension. Acta Mater 53(3): 823–83410.1016/j.actamat.2004.10.034 ↗
19. Miller O, Freund LB, Needleman A (1996) Modeling and simulation of dynamic fragmentation in brittle materials. Int J Fracure 96(2): 101–12510.1023/A:1018666317448 ↗
20. Mott NF, Linfoot EH (1943) A theory of fragmentation. Ministry of supply AC3348
21. Mott NF (1947) Fragmentation of shell cases. Proc Royal Soc A189: 300–30810.1098/rspa.1947.0042 ↗
22. Morris JP, Rubin MB, Block GI, Bonner PM (2006) Simulations of fracture and fragmentation of geologic materials using combined FEM/DEM analysis. Int Impact Eng 33(1–12): 463–47310.1016/j.ijimpeng.2006.09.006 ↗
23. Rosin P, Rammler E (1999) The laws governing the fineness of powdered coal. J Inst Fuel 7: 29–36
24. Weibull W (1951) A statistical distribution function of wide applicability. J Appl Mech 18: 293–29710.1115/1.4010337 ↗
25. Weibull W (1939) A statistical theory of strength of materials. The Royal Swedish Institute of Engineering Research (Ingenors Vetenskaps Akadiens Handligar) Proceeding No. 151
26. Zhou F, Molinari JF, Ramesh KT (2006) Analysis of the brittle fragmentation of an expanding ring. Comput Mater Sci 37(1–2): 74–8510.1016/j.commatsci.2005.12.017 ↗