A new cyclic loading method for measuring sheet fracture toughness
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper reports on a new method for the measurement of sheet fracture toughness. In this method, samples cut in DENT geometry are cyclically loaded. The maximum load for each cycle is incremented after each cycle until the sample fractures. The work in the final cycle is then the work required to fracture the sample. The fracture toughness determined using the new cyclic technique is compared with that determined using the Essential Work of Fracture (EWF) technique, for samples with a wide range of fracture toughness, and it is shown that cyclic technique gives a fracture toughness around 8% lower than the EWF technique. For 3 samples, cyclic fracture toughness values were measured for ligament lengths from 3.3 to 14.0 mm and compared with the EWF fracture toughness in each case. The cyclic fracture toughness was found to be independent of the ligament length, except for very weak samples, and to be 5–10% lower than the EWF fracture toughness. The differences between the EWF and cyclic fracture toughnesses were probably due to the development of damage zones around the crack tips before the fracture. The advantages of the new cyclic technique over the EWF technique are that it requires less sample area as only one ligament length is required, is quicker and can be readily automated.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Metal Forming Simulation Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. Broberg, K.B. (1974). On stable crack growth. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 33, 215-237.
2. Cotterell, B. and Reddel, J.K. (1977). The essential work of plane stress ductile fracture. International Journal of Fracture and Mechanics 13, 267-277.10.1007/BF00040143 ↗
3. Karenlampi, P., Cichoracki, T., Alava, M., Pylkko, J. and Paulapuro, H. (1998). A comparison of two test methods for estimating the fracture energy of paper. TAPPI J. 81(3), 154-160.
4. Kettunen, H. and Niskanen, K. (2000). Microscopic damage in paper. Part I: Method of analysis. J. Pulp Paper Sci. 26, 35-40.
5. Kettunen, H., Yu, Y. and Niskanen, K. (2000). Microscopic damage in paper. Part II: Effect of fibre properties. J. Pulp Paper Sci. 26, 260-265.
6. Mai, Y.-W. and Cotterell, B. (1986). On the essential work of ductile fracture in polymers. International Journal of Fracture 32, 105-125.10.1007/BF00019787 ↗
7. Marchal, Y., Walhin, J.F. and Delannay, F. (1997). Statistical Procedure for Improving the Precision of the Measurement of the EssentialWork of Fracture of Thin Sheets. International Journal of Fracture 87, 189-199.10.1023/A:1007482121146 ↗
8. Seth, R.S., Robertson, A.G., Mai, Y.-W. and Hoffman, J.D. (1993). Plane stress fracture toughness of paper. TAPPI J. 76(2), 109-116.
9. Tanaka, A., Otsuka, Y. and Yamauchi, T. (1997). In-plane fracture toughness testing of paper using thermography. TAPPI J. 80(5), 222-226.
10. Tanaka, A. and Yamauchi, T. (1997). Size estimation of plastic deformation zone at the crack tip of paper under fracture toughness testing. J. Pack. Sci. Technol. 6, 268-276.
11. Tanaka, A. and Yamauchi, T. (1999). Measurement of crack tip opening displacement of paper using CCD camera. J. Pack. Sci. Technol. 8, 11-18.
12. Tanaka, A. and Yamauchi, T. (2000). Deformation and fracture of paper during the in-plane fracture toughness testing-examination of the essential work of fracture method. J. Mat. Sci. 35, 1827-1833.10.1023/A:1004797023064 ↗
13. Wanigaratne, D.M.S., Batchelor, W.J., Conn, A.B. and Parker, I.H. (2000). Image analysis of plastic deformation in the fracture of paper. Appita J. 53, 471-475.
14. Wanigaratne, D.M.S., Batchelor, W.J. and Parker, I.H. (2001). Comparison of fracture toughness of paper with tensile properties. In 55th Appita Annual Conference Proceedings, Appita, Melbourne: 229-235.
15. Wanigaratne, D.M.S., Batchelor, W.J. and Parker, I.H. (2002). Comparison of fracture toughness of paper with tensile properties. Appita J. 55, 369-374.
16. Wellmar, P., Fellers, C. and Delhage, L. (1997). Fracture toughess of paper - development of a test method. Nordic Pulp Paper Res. J. 12, 189-195.10.3183/npprj-1997-12-03-p189-195 ↗
17. Westerlind, B.S., Carlsson, L.A. and Andersson, Y.M. (1991). Fracture toughness of liner board evaluated by the J-integral. J. Mat. Sci. 26, 2630-2636.10.1007/BF00545548 ↗
18. Wiens, M. and Gottsching, L. (1999). The j integral and its suitability for the characterisation of fracture toughness of paper [german]. Papier 53, 305-313.
19. Xu, L. and Parker, I. (2000). Simulating the forming process with the Moving Belt Drainage Former. Appita J. 53, 282-286.
20. Yu, Y. and Karenlampi, P. (1997). On crack stability in paper toughness testing. J. Mat. Sci. 32, 6513-6517.10.1023/A:1018607110106 ↗
21. Yuhara, T. and Kortschot, M.T. (1993). A simplified determination of the j-integral for paper. J. Mat. Sci. 28, 3571-3580.10.1007/BF01159839 ↗