journal article·2005-09

A Method to Extract Interface Stress Intensity Factors for Bimaterial Problems using Interlayers

Sridhar Santhanam

International Journal of Fracture· Volume 135· Issue 1-4
Publisher page

Abstract

A numerical method is presented here to determine stress intensity factors for interface cracks in plane, isotropic, elastic bimaterial fracture problems. The method relies on considering a companion problem wherein a very thin elastic interlayer with a crack, is artificially inserted between the two material regions of the original bimaterial problem. Modes I and II stress intensity factors are obtained for the companion problem using the modified virtual crack closure method. These stress intensity factors for the companion problem are then converted to the stress intensity factors for the original interface crack problem with the help of a universal relation. This universal relation between the stress intensity factors of the two problems is established by considering an asymptotic problem where the thickness of the interlayer is small compared with all other length scales. Two benchmark problems are considered to demonstrate the effectiveness of the interlayer approach for determining interface stress intensity factors.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Numerical methods in engineering · Composite Material Mechanics · Metal Forming Simulation Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (21)

Show source-provided references
1. C. Bjerkén · Engineering Fracture Mechanics · 2001 · 68 · 23510.1016/S0013-7944(00)00098-9 ↗
2. L.A. Carlsson · International Journal of Fracture · 1991 · 52 · 6710.1007/BF00020258 ↗
3. D. Chakraborty · Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology · 2000 · 14 · 149910.1163/156856100742339 ↗
4. P.G. Charalambides · Journal of Applied Mechanics · 1989 · 56 · 7710.1115/1.3176069 ↗
5. S.B. Cho · Engineering Fracture Mechanics · 1992 · 43 · 60310.1016/0013-7944(92)90202-P ↗
6. B.D. Davidson · Engineering Fracture Mechanics · 1995 · 52 · 24310.1016/0013-7944(95)00016-O ↗
7. J. Dundurs · Journal of Applied Mechanics · 1969 · 36 · 65010.1115/1.3564739 ↗
8. N.A. Fleck · International Journal of Solids and Structures · 1991 · 27 · 168310.1016/0020-7683(91)90069-R ↗
9. R.F. Gibson · Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology · 2001 · 123 · 30910.1115/1.1370385 ↗
10. P. Gu · Journal of Applied Mechanics · 1993 · 60 · 105210.1115/1.2900976 ↗
11. H. Hu · Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites · 1999 · 18 · 118610.1177/073168449901801302 ↗
12. J.W. Hutchinson · Journal of Applied Mechanics · 1987 · 54 · 82810.1115/1.3173124 ↗
13. J.W. Hutchinson · Advances in Applied Mechanics · 1992 · 29 · 6310.1016/S0065-2156(08)70164-9 ↗
14. P.P.L. Matos · International Journal of Fracture · 1989 · 40 · 23510.1007/BF00963659 ↗
15. I.S. Raju · Engineering Fracture Mechanics · 1988 · 30 · 38310.1016/0013-7944(88)90196-8 ↗
16. J.R. Rice · Journal of Applied Mechanics · 1988 · 55 · 9810.1115/1.3173668 ↗
17. R.E. Smelser · International Journal of Fracture · 1979 · 15 · 13510.1007/BF00037829 ↗
18. N. Sukumar · International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering · 2003 · 68 · 110.1002/nme.664 ↗
19. C.T. Sun · Engineering Fracture Mechanics · 1987 · 28 · 12
20. Z. Suo · Materials Science and Engineering · 1989 · A107 · 13510.1016/0921-5093(89)90382-1 ↗
21. F. Xiao · Computational Mechanics · 1994 · 15 · 5810.1007/BF00350289 ↗