Effect of surface energy on the plastic behavior of crystalline thin films under plane strain constrained shear
Source abstract
Abstract
In this work, a new continuum dislocation based model for crystal plasticity with surface energy effect is proposed. Based on the model, a thin film under plane constrained shear is considered. From the perspective of energy, the yield strength as a function of film thickness has been calculated which is achieved by comparing the energy due to elastic deformation, plastic deformation without surface energy and that with surface energy effect. According to the numerical results, the model including the impenetrable surface assumption can capture the surface dominated deformation mechanism for thin films of nanometer scale. In addition, the transition in dominant deformation mechanisms is also predicted for film thicknesses ranging from tens of nanometers to several microns.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Nonlocal and gradient elasticity in micro/nano structures · Numerical methods in engineering
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (16)
Show source-provided references
1. Abu Al-Rub RK, Voyiadjis GZ (2006) A physically based gradient plasticity theory. Int J Plast 22: 654–68410.1016/j.ijplas.2005.04.010 ↗
2. Dehm G, Wagner T, Balk TJ, Arzt E (2002) Plasticity and interfacial dislocation mechanisms in epitaxial and polycrystalline Al films constrained by substrates. J Mater Sci Technol 18: 113–117
3. Fredriksson P, Gudmundson P (2007) Modelling the interface between a thin film and a substrate within a strain gradient framework. J Mech Phys Solids 55: 939–95510.1016/j.jmps.2006.11.001 ↗
4. Greer JR, Nix WD (2006) Nanoscale gold pillars strengthened through dislocation starvation. Phys Rev B 73: 24541010.1103/PhysRevB.73.245410 ↗
5. Gruber PA, Bohm J, Onuseit F et al (2008) Size effects on yield strength and strain hardening for ultra-thin Cu films with and without passivation: a study by synchrotron and bulge test techniques. Acta Mater 56: 2318–233510.1016/j.actamat.2008.01.027 ↗
6. Gurtin AE, Murdoch AI (1975) A continuum theory of elastic material surfaces. Arch Rat Mech Anal 57: 291–32310.1007/BF00261375 ↗
7. Haque MA, Saif MTA (2003) Strain gradient effect in nanoscale thin films. Acta Mater 51: 3053–306110.1016/S1359-6454(03)00116-2 ↗
8. He LH, Lim CW, Wu BS (2004) A continuum model for size-dependent deformation of elastic films of nano-scale thickness. Int J Solids Struct 41: 847–85710.1016/j.ijsolstr.2003.10.001 ↗
9. Le KC, Sembiring P (2008) Analytical solution of plane constrained shear problem for single crystals within continuum dislocation theory. Arch Appl Mech 78: 587–59710.1007/s00419-007-0178-1 ↗
10. Limkumnerd S, Van der Giessen E (2008) Study of size effects in thin films by means of a crystal plasticity theory based DiFT. J Mech Phys Solids 56: 3304–331410.1016/j.jmps.2008.06.004 ↗
11. Miller RE, Shenoy VB (2000) Size-dependent elastic properties of nanosized structural elements. Nanotechnology 11: 139–14710.1088/0957-4484/11/3/301 ↗
12. Nicola L, Xiang Y, Vlassak JJ, Van der Giessen E, Needleman A (2006) Plastic deformation of freestanding thin films: experiments and modeling. J Mech Phys Solids 54: 2089–211010.1016/j.jmps.2006.04.005 ↗
13. Nix WD (1998) Yielding and strain hardening of thin metal films on substrates. Script Mater 39: 545–55410.1016/S1359-6462(98)00195-X ↗
14. Shan ZW, Mishra RK, Syed Asif SA, Warren OL, Minor AM (2008) Mechanical annealing and source-limited deformation in submicrometre-diameter Ni crystals. Nat Mater 7: 115–11910.1038/nmat2085 ↗
15. Yu DYW, Spaepen F (2004) The yield strength of thin copper films on Kapton. J Appl Phys 95: 2991–299710.1063/1.1644634 ↗
16. Yun G, Hwang KC, Huang Y, Wu PD, Liu C (2006) Size effect in tension of thin films on substrate: a study based on the reformulation of mechanism-based strain gradient plasticity. Phil Mag 86: 5553–556610.1080/14786430600577928 ↗