The initiation J-integral for linear viscoelastic solids with constant Poisson's ratio
Source abstract
Abstract
The present work examines the fracture response of homogeneous and linear isotropic visco-elastic solids with constant Poisson's ratio. For this type of materials it is shown that the J-integral at fixed crack size is proportional to the area under the load-vs-load point displacement record of a fracture test, and that, for given boundary conditions, the factor of proportionality depends on crack and specimen geometry – and also, perhaps, on Poisson's ratio – but is independent of material heredity. As a consequence, the factor of proportionality – or crack configuration factor – can be established by analysis of the test article, subjected to the same displacement and traction boundary conditions as the test, but using – if desired – an arbitrary linear elastic material with the constant Poisson's ratio of the viscoelastic solid. The same approach is shown valid for a class of nonlinear viscoelastic materials whose constitution involves single hereditary integrals, and whose property functions do not depend on stress. The methodology is used with the results of constant displacement-rate tests of centrally cracked specimens to construct a portion of the master initiation J-integral function for a solid propellant.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (9)
Show source-provided references
1. Anderson, T.L. (1995). Fracture Mechanics, Fundamentals and Applications 2nd edn., CRC Press, 123–126.
2. Broek, D. (1986). Elementary Engineering Fracture Mechanics 4th Edn., Martinus Nijhoff, Leiden, 140–146.
3. Christensen, R.M. (1971). Theory of Viscoelasticity. An Introduction, Academic Press, New York, 37–40.
4. Kanninen, M.F. and Popelar, C.H. (1985). Advanced Fracture Mechanics, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 346–351.
5. Gutierrez-Lemini, D. (2001). Fracture Tougheness Characterization of Solid Propellants. Search for a Standard, JANNAF, 34th Structures and Mechanical Behavior Subcommittee, March 2001, pending security clearance.
6. Paris, P.C., Ernst, H. and Turner, C. (1980). A J-Integral Approach to Development of η Factors. Fracture Mechanics, Twelfth Conference, ASTM STP 700, American Society for Testing and Materials, 338–351.10.1520/STP36979S ↗
7. Rice, J.R., Paris, P.C. and Merkle, J.G. (1973). Some Further Results of J-Integral Analysis and Estimates. American Society for Testing and Materials, 231–245.10.1520/STP49643S ↗
8. Schapery, R.A. (1984). Correspondence principles and a generalized J-integral for large deformation and fracture analysis of viscoelastic media. International Journal of Fracture 25, 195–223.10.1007/BF01140837 ↗
9. Sumpter, J.D.G. and Turner, C.E. (1976). Method for Laboratory Determination of Jc. Cracks and Fracture, ASTM STP 601, American Society for Testing and Materials, 3–18.10.1520/STP28634S ↗