Dual EMAT and PEC non-contact probe: applications to defect testing
Source abstract
Abstract
For many non-destructive testing (NDT) applications, more information and greater reliability can be gained by using different techniques for defect detection, especially when the methods are particularly sensitive to different types of defects. However, this will often lead to a much longer and more expensive test and is not always practical due to time and cost constraints. We have previously discussed initial experiments using a new dual-probe combining electromagnetic acoustic transducers (EMATs) generating and detecting ultrasonic surface waves, and a pulsed eddy current (PEC) sensor [1]. This enables more reliable detection and sizing of surface and near-surface defects, with a reduced testing time compared to using two NDT techniques separately. In this paper, we present experiments using the dual-probe on samples which are more representative of real defects, for example testing for surface defects in rails. Several aluminium calibration samples containing closely spaced and angled slots have been measured, in addition to rail samples containing manufactured and real defects. The benefits of using the dual-probe are discussed.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. Sophian A, Edwards RS, Tian GY, Dixon S. Insight 2005;47(6):341–5.10.1784/insi.47.6.341.66452 ↗
2. Blitz · 1996
3. Cannon · Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct · 2003 · 26 · 86510.1046/j.1460-2695.2003.00693.x ↗
4. Armitage · Insight · 2002 · 44 · 369
5. Pearson · Insight · 2002 · 44 · 375
6. In QNDE, 14B
7. Horn · NDT&E Int · 2000 · 33 · 35110.1016/S0963-8695(99)00058-4 ↗
8. Smith · Insight Nondestr Test Cond Monit · 2001 · 43 · 14
9. Tian · NDT&E Int · 2005 · 38 · 7710.1016/j.ndteint.2004.06.001 ↗
10. Edwards · Rev Prog QNDE · 2004 · 24B · 1568
11. Edwards · J Phys D Appl Phys · 2004 · 37 · 229110.1088/0022-3727/37/16/011 ↗
12. Frost · 1979
13. Palmer · Insight · 2003 · 45 · 21110.1784/insi.45.3.211.53154 ↗
14. Viktorov · 1967
15. Edwards RS, Dixon S, Jian X. NDT&E. Int; submitted.
16. Jian X, Dixon S, Edwards RS. NDT&E 2005; accepted.
17. Shin · Sens Actuators A · 1996 · 51 · 17310.1016/0924-4247(95)01219-2 ↗
18. Rose · NDT&E Int · 2004 · 37 · 15310.1016/j.ndteint.2003.04.001 ↗
19. Babich · NDT&E Int · 2004 · 37 · 10510.1016/j.ndteint.2003.05.001 ↗
20. Sophian A, Tian GY. Sens Actuators A; 2005; accepted.
21. Jian · Insight · 2004 · 46 · 67110.1784/insi.46.11.671.52289 ↗
22. Scruby · 1990