journal article·2018-01Open access

A degradation function consistent with Cocks–Ashby porosity kinetics

John A. Moore

International Journal of Fracture· Volume 209· Issue 1-2

Abstract

The load carrying capacity of ductile materials degrades as a function of porosity, stress state and strain-rate. The effect of these variables on porosity kinetics is captured by the Cocks–Ashby model; however, the Cocks–Ashby model does not account for material degradation directly. This work uses a yield criteria to form a degradation function that is consistent with Cocks–Ashby porosity kinetics and is a function of porosity, stress state and strain-rate dependence. Approximations of this degradation function for pure hydrostatic stress states are also explored.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Microstructure and mechanical properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (14)

Show source-provided references
1. Anderson A, Cooper R, Neely R, Nichols A, Sharp R, Wallin B (2003) Users manual for ALE3D—an arbitrary Lagrange/Eulerian 3D code system. Technical report UCRL-MA-152204, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. https://wci.llnl.gov/simulation/computer-codes/ale3d
2. Barton N, Rhee M, Li S, Bernier J, Kumar M, Lind J, Bingert J (2014) Using high energy diffraction microscopy to assess a model for microstructural sensitivity in spall response. In: Journal of Physics: conference series, vol 500, IOP Publishing, p 11200710.1088/1742-6596/500/11/112007 ↗
3. Benzerga A, Besson J, Pineau A (1999) Coalescence-controlled anisotropic ductile fracture. Trans Am Soc Mech Eng J Eng Mater Technol 121:221–22910.1115/1.2812369 ↗
4. Cocks A (1989) Inelastic deformation of porous materials. J Mech Phys Solids 37(6):693–71510.1016/0022-5096(89)90014-8 ↗
5. Cocks A, Ashby M (1980) Intergranular fracture during power-law creep under multiaxial stresses. Metal Sci 14(8–9):395–40210.1179/030634580790441187 ↗
6. Duva J, Hutchinson J (1984) Constitutive potentials for dilutely voided nonlinear materials. Mech Mater 3(1):41–5410.1016/0167-6636(84)90013-9 ↗
7. Gurson AL (1977) Continuum theory of ductile rupture by void nucleation and growth: Part I—yield criteria and flow rules for porous ductile media. J Eng Mater Technol 99(1):2–1510.1115/1.3443401 ↗
8. Kweon S (2012) Damage at negative triaxiality. Eur J Mech A Solids 31(1):203–21210.1016/j.euromechsol.2011.02.005 ↗
9. Lee YS, Dawson PR (1993) Modeling ductile void growth in viscoplastic materials—Part I: void growth model. Mech Mater 15(1):21–3410.1016/0167-6636(93)90076-4 ↗
10. Marin E, McDowell D (1996) Associative versus non-associative porous viscoplasticity based on internal state variable concepts. Int J Plast 12(5):629–66910.1016/S0749-6419(96)00023-X ↗
11. Michel J, Suquet P (1992) The constitutive law of nonlinear viscous and porous materials. J Mech Phys Solids 40(4):783–81210.1016/0022-5096(92)90004-L ↗
12. Rodriguez OL, Allison PG, Whittington WR, Francis DK, Rivera OG, Chou K, Gong X, Butler T, Burroughs JF (2015) Dynamic tensile behavior of electron beam additive manufactured Ti6Al4V. Mater Sci Eng A 641:323–32710.1016/j.msea.2015.06.069 ↗
13. Sofronis P, McMeeking R (1992) Creep of power-law material containing spherical voids. J Appl Mech 59(2S):S88–S9510.1115/1.2899512 ↗
14. Vaz M Jr, Andrade Pires F (2016) A note on the thermal effects upon a Gurson-type material model. Contin Mech Thermodyn 28(3):785–79810.1007/s00161-015-0416-7 ↗