An adhesive zone model for polymeric interfaces
Source abstract
Abstract
In this work we develop an adhesive zone model for polymeric interfaces, which describes the kinetics of dissociation and association of polymer chains bridging the interface. Compared with previous works on interfacial bond rupture, our adhesive zone model includes two novel features: possibility of bond reforming and a highly nonlinear force–extension relationship for the polymer chain motivated by previous experimental measurements. The absence of these two features was demonstrated in an earlier work to cause unphysical crack propagation under zero load as well as overextension of the chains beyond their full contour length. Using the rate dependent crack propagation in a double cantilever beam, which may be elastic or viscoelastic, as an example, the new adhesive zone model is shown to correct the unphysical results obtained earlier. Specifically, it leads to a significantly increased adhesive fracture energy, i.e., the energy per unit area required to rupture the chains on the interface, for slow crack propagation, owing to the ability to achieve a dynamic equilibrium of bond dissociation and association. Furthermore, the nonlinear chain model predicts a near-catastrophic decrease in chain density as the finite extensibility limit is approached. This results in an adhesive fracture energy which is orders of magnitude smaller than that predicted by the linear chain model for fast crack propagation. Although the adhesive zone model has only been applied to a double cantilever beam in this work, it is a generic model for polymeric interface, and can be implemented in finite element models to simulate fracture in bulk polymers in general.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Polymer crystallization and properties · Nanofabrication and Lithography Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. Andrews EH, Kinloch AJ (1973) Mechanics of adhesive failure I. Proc R Soc Lond A 332:385–39910.1098/rspa.1973.0032 ↗
2. Bell G (1978) Models for the specific adhesion of cells to cells. Science 12:618–62710.1126/science.347575 ↗
3. Beyer MK, Clausen-Schaumann H (2005) Mechanochemistry: the mechanical activation of covalent bonds. Chem Rev 105:2921–294810.1021/cr030697h ↗
4. Chaudhury MK (1999) Rate-dependent fracture at adhesive interface. J Phys Chem B 103:6562–656610.1021/jp9906482 ↗
5. Christiansen RM (2003) Theory of viscoelasticity, 2nd edn. Dover, New York
6. Evans E, Ritchie K (1997) Dynamic strength of molecular adhesion bonds. Biophys J 72:1541–155510.1016/S0006-3495(97)78802-7 ↗
7. Gent AN (1996) Adhesion and strength of viscoelastic solids. Is there a relationship between adhesion and bulk properties? Langmuir 12:4492–449610.1021/la950887q ↗
8. Gent AN, Schultz J (1972) Effect of wetting liquids on the strength of adhesion of viscoelastic material. Adhesion 3:281–29410.1080/00218467208072199 ↗
9. Ghatak A, Vorvolakos K, She H, Malotky DL, Chaudhury MK (2000) Interfacial rate processes in adhesion and friction. J Phys Chem B 104:4018–403010.1021/jp9942973 ↗
10. Hanggi P, Talkner P, Michal B (1990) Reaction-rate theory: fifty years after Kramers. Rev Mod Phys 62:251–34210.1103/RevModPhys.62.251 ↗
11. Hui CY, Xu DB, Kramer EJ (1992) A fracture model for a weak interface in a viscoelastic material (small scale yielding analysis). J Appl Phys 72(8):3294–330410.1063/1.351451 ↗
12. Hui CY, Tang T, Lin YY, Chaudhury MK (2004) Failure of elastomeric polymers due to rate dependent bond rupture. Langmuir 20:6052–606410.1021/la0356607 ↗
13. Kramers HA (1940) Brownian motion in a field of force and the diffusion model of chemical reactions. Physica VII:284–30410.1016/S0031-8914(40)90098-2 ↗
14. Lake GJ, Thomas AG (1967) The strength of highly elastic materials. Proc R Soc Lond A 300:108–11910.1098/rspa.1967.0160 ↗
15. Lavoie SR, Long R, Tang T (2015) Rate dependent fracture of a double cantilever beam with combined bulk and interfacial dissipation. Int J Solids Struct. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.08.02010.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.08.020 ↗
16. Nguyen TD, Govindjee S (2006) Numerical study of geometric constraint and cohesive parameters in steady-state viscoelastic crack growth. Int J Fract 141:255–26810.1007/s10704-006-0080-9 ↗
17. Rahulkumar P, Jagota A, Bennison SJ, Saigal S (2000) Cohesive element modeling of viscoelastic fracture: application to peel testing of polymers. Int J Solids Struct 37:1873–189710.1016/S0020-7683(98)00339-4 ↗
18. Rajagopal KR, Wineman A (1992) A constitutive equation for nonlinear solids which undergo deformation induced microstructural changes. Int J Plast 8:385–39510.1016/0749-6419(92)90056-I ↗
19. She H, Malotky D, Chaudhury MK (1998) Estimation of adhesion hysteresis using rolling contact mechanics. Langmuir 14:3090–310010.1021/la971061m ↗
20. Wineman A (2009) On the mechanics of elastomers undergoing scission and cross-linking. Int J Adv Eng Sci Appl Math 1:123–13110.1007/s12572-010-0004-9 ↗
21. Wojtecki RJ, Meador MA, Rowan SJ (2011) Using the dynamic bond to access macroscopically responsive structurally dynamic polymers. Nat Mater 10:14–2710.1038/nmat2891 ↗
22. Xu DB, Hui CY, Kramer EJ (1992) Interface fracture and viscoelastic deformation in finite size specimens. J Appl Phys 72(8):3305–331610.1063/1.352342 ↗