journal article·2014-07Open access

An empirical model for estimating fracture toughness using the DCDC geometry

Christian Nielsen, Alireza V. Amirkhizi, Sia Nemat-Nasser

International Journal of Fracture· Volume 188· Issue 1

Abstract

The double cleavage drilled compression (DCDC) geometry is useful for creating large cracks in a material in a controlled manner. Several models for estimating fracture toughness from DCDC measurements have been proposed, but each is suitable for a subset of geometries and material properties. In this work, a series of finite element fracture simulations are performed over a range of sample widths, hole sizes, heights, Young’s moduli, Poisson’s ratios, critical stress intensity factors, and boundary conditions. Analyzing the simulation results, fracture toughness is found to be a simple function of sample width, hole size, and an extrapolated stress at zero crack length obtained from a linear fit of the data. Experimental results in the literature are found to agree with this simple relationship.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Drilling and Well Engineering · Rock Mechanics and Modeling · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (10)

Show source-provided references
1. Chen X, Dam MA, Ono K, Mal A, Shen H, Nutt SR, Sheran K, Wudl F (2002) A thermally re-mendable cross-linked polymeric material. Science 295:1698–170210.1126/science.1065879 ↗
2. Hamilton AR, Sottos NR, White SR (2010) Self-healing of internal damage in synthetic vascular materials. Adv Mater 22:5159–516310.1002/adma.201002561 ↗
3. He MY, Turner MR, Evans AG (1995) Analysis of the double cleavage drilled compression sample for interface fracture energy measurements over a range of mode mixities. Acta Metall et Mater 43:3453–345810.1016/0956-7151(95)00036-U ↗
4. Horii H, Nemat-Nasser S (1985) Compression-induced microcrack growth in brittle solids: axial splitting and shear failure. J Geophys Res Sol Earth 90(B4):3105–312510.1029/JB090iB04p03105 ↗
5. Janssen C (1974) Specimen for fracture mechanics studies on glass. 10th International congress on glass: Kyoto, Japan. Ceramic Society of Japan
6. Michalske TA, Smith WL, Chen EP (1993) Stress intensity calibration for the double cleavage drilled compression specimen. Eng Fract Mech 45:637–64210.1016/0013-7944(93)90269-X ↗
7. Nielsen C, Amirkhizi AV, Nemat-Nasser S (2012) The effect of geometry on fracture strength measurements using DCDC samples. Eng Fract Mech 91:1–1310.1016/j.engfracmech.2012.04.030 ↗
8. Plaisted TA, Amirkhizi AV, Nemat-Nasser S (2006) Compre- ssion-induced axial crack propagation in DCDC polymer samples: experiments and modeling. Int J Fract 141:447–45710.1007/s10704-006-9006-9 ↗
9. Plaisted TA, Nemat-Nasser S (2007) Quantitative evaluation of fracture, healing and re-healing of a reversibly cross-linked polymer. Acta Mater 55:5684–569610.1016/j.actamat.2007.06.019 ↗
10. Weiderhorn SM, Johnson H, Diness AM, Heuer AH (1974) Fracture of glass in vacuum. J Am Ceram Soc 57:336–34110.1111/j.1151-2916.1974.tb10917.x ↗