Analysis of the peel test for elastic-plastic film with combined kinematic and isotropic hardening
Source abstract
Abstract
The paper is dedicated to the mechanical analysis of peel tests for a ductile film on an elastic substrate. This test is widely adopted to access the interface fracture energy. In the literature, the analytical analysis of the peel test is often based on the bending model to quantify the work done by bending plasticity within the film. Isotropic hardening is only considered. In the present work, a new contribution is proposed where the ductile film has an elastic-plastic behavior with combined kinematic-isotropic hardening. A semi-analytical expression for the work done by bending plasticity is obtained in the general case and a closed-form expression is found when only kinematic hardening is present. The validation of the theoretical work is established via finite element simulations of $$90^o$$ peel test. Two model materials having the same uniaxial tensile response are considered: one presents isotropic hardening while the second only kinematic hardening. The comparison between them enables quantification of the role of kinematic hardening in the prediction of the interface fracture energy.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Numerical methods in engineering · Fatigue and fracture mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. ABAQUS (2013) Abaqus v6.13 Users Manual, version 6.13 edn. ABAQUS Inc., Richmond, USA
2. Aravas N, Kim K, Loukis M (1989) On the mechanics of adhesion testing of flexible films. Mater Sci Eng, A 107:159–16810.1016/0921-5093(89)90384-5 ↗
3. Chaboche J (1991) On some modifications of kinematic hardening to improve the description of ratchetting effects. Int J Plast 7:661–67810.1016/0749-6419(91)90050-9 ↗
4. Courvoisier L, Martiny M, Ferron G (2003) Analytical modelling of drawbeads in sheet metal forming. J Mater Process Technol 133:359–37010.1016/S0924-0136(02)01124-X ↗
5. Girard G, Jrad M, Bahi S, Martiny M, Mercier S, Bodin L, Nevo D, Dareys S (2018) Experimental and numerical characterization of thin woven composites used in printed circuit boards for high frequency applications. Compos Struct 193:140–15310.1016/j.compstruct.2018.03.037 ↗
6. Girard G, Martiny M, Mercier S (2020) Experimental characterization of rolled annealed copper film used in flexible printed circuit boards: Identification of the elastic-plastic and low-cycle fatigue behaviors. Microelectron Reliab 115:11397610.1016/j.microrel.2020.113976 ↗
7. Girard G, Frydrych K, Kowalczyk-Gajewska K, Martiny M, Mercier S (2021) Cyclic response of electrodeposited copper films. experiments and elastic-viscoplastic mean-field modeling. Mechanics of Materials 153:10368510.1016/j.mechmat.2020.103685 ↗
8. Kendall K (1973) Shrinkage and peel strength of adhesive joints. J Phys D Appl Phys 6(15):1782–178710.1088/0022-3727/6/15/304 ↗
9. Kendall K (1975) Thin-film peeling-the elastic term. J Phys D Appl Phys 8(13):1449–145210.1088/0022-3727/8/13/005 ↗
10. Kim J, Kim K, Kim Y (1989) Mechanical effects in peel adhesion test. J Adhesion Sci Technol 3:175–18710.1163/156856189X00146 ↗
11. Kim K, Aravas N (1988) Elastoplastic analysis of the peel test. Int J Solids Struct 24:417–43510.1016/0020-7683(88)90071-6 ↗
12. Kim K, Kim J (1988) Elasto-plastic analysis of the peel test for thin film adhesion. Transactions of the ASME 110:266–27310.1115/1.3250461 ↗
13. Kinloch A, Lau C, JG W, (1994) The peeling of flexible laminates. International Journal of Fracture 66:45–7010.1007/BF00012635 ↗
14. Martiny P, Lani F, Kinloch A, Pardoen T (2008) Numerical analysis of the energy contributions in peel tests : a steady-state multilevel finite element approach. Int J Adhes Adhes 28:222–23610.1016/j.ijadhadh.2007.06.005 ↗
15. McClintock FA, Zhou Q, Wierzbick T (1993) Necking in plane strain under bending with constant tension. J Mech Phys Solids 41(8):1327–134310.1016/0022-5096(93)90082-Q ↗
16. Moidu K, Sinclair A, Spelt J (1998) On the determination of fracture energy using the peel test. J Test Eval 26:247–25410.1520/JTE11998J ↗
17. Pandolfi A, Krysl P, Ortiz M (1999) Finite element simulation of ring expansion and fragmentation: The capturing of length and time scales through cohesive models of fracture. Int J Fract 95:297–29710.1023/A:1018672922734 ↗
18. Prager W (1949) Recent developments in the mathematical theory of plasticity. J Appl Phys 20:235–24110.1063/1.1698348 ↗
19. Rivlin R (1944) The effective work of adhesion. Paint Technology 9:215–218
20. Simlissi E, Martiny M, Mercier S, Bahi S, Bodin E (2019) Elastic-plastic analysis of the peel test for ductile thin film presenting a saturation of the yield stress. Int J Fract 220:1–1610.1007/s10704-019-00393-7 ↗
21. Song J, Yu J (2002) Analysis of T-peel strength in a Cu/Cr/Polyimide system. Acta Mater 50:3985–399410.1016/S1359-6454(02)00197-0 ↗
22. Thouless M, Yang Q (2008) A parametric study of the peel test. Int J Adhes Adhes 28:176–18410.1016/j.ijadhadh.2007.06.006 ↗
23. Tvergaard V, Hutchinson J (1993) The influence of plasticity on mixed mode interface toughness. J Mech Phys Solids 41:1119–113510.1016/0022-5096(93)90057-M ↗
24. Wang N (1982) A mathematical model of drawbead forces in sheet metal forming. J Appl Metalwork 2(3):193–19910.1007/BF02834037 ↗
25. Wei Y (2004) Modeling non linear peeling of ductile thin films - critical assessment of analytical bending models using FE simulations. Int J Solids Struct 41:5087–510410.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.04.026 ↗
26. Wei Y, Hutchinson J (1998) Interface strength, work of adhesion and plasticity in peel test. Int J Fract 93:315–33310.1023/A:1007545200315 ↗
27. Williams J, Kauzlarich J (2005) The influence of peel angle on the mechanics of peeling flexible adherends with arbitrary load - extension characteristics. Tribol Int 38:951–95810.1016/j.triboint.2005.07.024 ↗
28. Yang Q, Thouless M (2001) Mixed-mode fracture analyses of plastically-deforming adhesive joints. Int J Fract 110:175–18710.1023/A:1010869706996 ↗
29. Yang Q, Thouless M, Ward S (2000) Analysis of the symmetrical $$90^o$$- peel test with extensive plastic deformation. J Adhes 72:115–13210.1080/00218460008029274 ↗