Effect of atomistic modeling parameters on the simulation of fracture in graphene
Source abstract
Abstract
For a wide range of graphene applications, it is required to examine the fracture characteristics of single-layer graphene sheets. In this article, we study the effective parameters in fracture of graphene, concentrating on the impact of atomistic modeling on results that have not been adequately evaluated in previous studies. We considered two distinct models to simulate a uniaxial tensile test in molecular dynamics. By comparing these models, we explore the influence of various parameters on the results, particularly fracture strength and failure strain. We demonstrate that in pristine graphene sheets, failure depends entirely on simulation modeling. The two main factors that lead to these variations are loading patterns and boundary conditions. Based on the models, the obtained results are significantly different. Nevertheless, in pre-cracked graphene, parameters are strongly affected by the initial defect, especially the crack tip. To better understand the parameters affecting the simulation results, we investigate the dependence of the mechanical properties of defective graphene sheets on strain rate and crack tip area. This investigation helps to comprehend these parameters and clarifies some of the reasons for the discrepancies in the literature.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Graphene research and applications · Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications · Boron and Carbon Nanomaterials Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. Allen BL, Kichambare PD, Star A (2007) Carbon nanotube field-effect-transistor-based biosensors. Adv Mater 19(11):1439–145110.1002/adma.200602043 ↗
2. Ansari R, Ajori S, Motevalli B (2012) Mechanical properties of defective single-layered graphene sheets via molecular dynamics simulation. Superlattices Microstruct 51(2):274–28910.1016/j.spmi.2011.11.019 ↗
3. Anthea AA, Konstantinos R, Glenn C, Borg Matthew K (2016) Mechanical properties of pristine and nanoporous graphene. Mol Simul 42(18):1502–151110.1080/08927022.2016.1209753 ↗
4. Arshee MR, Adnan S, Motalab M, Bose P (2019) Inherent mechanical properties of bilayer germanene coupled by covalent bonding. RSC Adv 9(59):34437–3445010.1039/C9RA06003K ↗
5. Atqiya M, Hatijah B, Mukti WK, Zainizan SM, Rosni Nurliyana Md (2021) Graphene sensor for future local economic development: a review. J Phys 1842:012054
6. Chung J-Y, Sorkin V, Pei Q-X, Chiu C-H, Zhang Y-W (2017) Mechanical properties and failure behaviour of graphene/silicene/graphene heterostructures. J Phys D 50(34):34530210.1088/1361-6463/aa7938 ↗
7. Dewapriya MAN, Meguid SA (2017) Atomistic modeling of out-of-plane deformation of a propagating Griffith crack in graphene. Acta Mech 228(9):3063–307510.1007/s00707-017-1883-7 ↗
8. Dewapriya MAN, Meguid SA (2018) Tailoring fracture strength of graphene. Comput Mater Sci 141:114–12110.1016/j.commatsci.2017.09.005 ↗
9. Dewapriya MAN, Rajapakse RKND (2014) Molecular dynamics simulations and continuum modeling of temperature and strain rate dependent fracture strength of graphene with vacancy defects. J Appl Mech 81(8):08101010.1115/1.4027681 ↗
10. Dewapriya MAN, Rajapakse RKND, Phani AS (2014) Atomistic and continuum modelling of temperature-dependent fracture of graphene. Int J Fract 187(2):199–21210.1007/s10704-014-9931-y ↗
11. Diyaroglu C, Behera D, Madenci E, Kaya Y, Kedziora G, Nepal D (2019) Peridynamic modeling of wrinkling in a graphene layer. AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum, p 104010.2514/6.2019-1040 ↗
12. Ghorbanpour Arani A, Kolahchi R, Mortazavi SA (2014) Nonlocal piezoelasticity based wave propagation of bonded double-piezoelectric nanobeam-systems. Int J Mech Mater Des 10(2):179–19110.1007/s10999-014-9239-0 ↗
13. Huijuan Z, Min K, Aluru Narayana R (2009) Size and chirality dependent elastic properties of graphene nanoribbons under uniaxial tension. Nano Lett 9(8):3012–301510.1021/nl901448z ↗
14. Hwu C, Aggarwal M, Lee J (2020) Prediction of fracture toughness and crack propagation of graphene via coupling of boundary element and nonlinear beam element. Int J Fract 224:1–1910.1007/s10704-020-00453-3 ↗
15. Jhon Young I, Min JY, Yeom Geun Y, Jhon Myung S (2014) Orientation dependence of the fracture behavior of graphene. Carbon 66:619–62810.1016/j.carbon.2013.09.051 ↗
16. Lei S, Cao Q, Geng X, Yang Y, Liu S, Peng Q (2018) The mechanical properties of defective graphyne. Curr Comput-Aided Drug Des 8(12):465
17. Li M, Deng T, Zheng B, Zhang Y, Liao Y, Zhou H (2019) Effect of defects on the mechanical and thermal properties of graphene. Nanomaterials 9(3):34710.3390/nano9030347 ↗
18. Liu X, He X, Wang J, Sun L, Oterkus E (2018) An ordinary state-based peridynamic model for the fracture of zigzag graphene sheets. Proc R Soc A 474(2217):2018001910.1098/rspa.2018.0019 ↗
19. Novoselov Konstantin S, Fal VI, Colombo L, Gellert PR, Schwab MG, Kim K et al (2012) A roadmap for graphene. Nature 490(7419):192–20010.1038/nature11458 ↗
20. Panyathip R, Choopun S, Singjai P, Sakulsermsuk S (2017) Temperature dependence of graphene and n-doped graphene for gas sensor applications. J Phys 901:012076
21. Rahman MH, Mitra S, Motalab M, Bose P (2020) Investigation on the mechanical properties and fracture phenomenon of silicon doped graphene by molecular dynamics simulation. RSC Adv 10(52):31318–3133210.1039/D0RA06085B ↗
22. Rajasekaran G, Parashar A (2017) Enhancement of fracture toughness of graphene via crack bridging with stone-thrower-wales defects. Diam Relat Mater 74:90–9910.1016/j.diamond.2017.02.015 ↗
23. Rajasekaran G, Parashar A (2018) Effect of topological defects on mechanical properties of graphene sheets: a molecular dynamics study. Mater Today 5(2):6780–6788
24. Rakib T, Mojumder S, Das S, Saha S, Motalab M (2017) Graphene and its elemental analogue: a molecular dynamics view of fracture phenomenon. Physica B 515:67–7410.1016/j.physb.2017.04.009 ↗
25. Silling SA, Fermen-Coker M (2021) Peridynamic model for microballistic perforation of multilayer graphene. Theor Appl Fract Mech 113:10294710.1016/j.tafmec.2021.102947 ↗
26. Silling SA, D’Elia M, Yu Y, You H, Fermen-Coker M (2022) Peridynamic model for single-layer graphene obtained from coarse-grained bond forces. J Peridyn Nonlocal Model 5:1–22
27. Sun YJ, Ma F, Ma DY, Xu KW, Chu Paul K (2012) Stress-induced annihilation of stone-wales defects in graphene nanoribbons. J Phys D 45(30):30530310.1088/0022-3727/45/30/305303 ↗
28. Torkaman-Asadi MA, Kouchakzadeh MA (2022) Atomistic simulations of mechanical properties and fracture of graphene: a review. Comput Mater Sci 210:11145710.1016/j.commatsci.2022.111457 ↗
29. Wang MC, Cheng Y, Ma Lin H, Ning CMW (2012) Effect of defects on fracture strength of graphene sheets. Comput Mater Sci 54:236–23910.1016/j.commatsci.2011.10.032 ↗
30. Yin F, Ragab T, Basaran C (2016) The effect of stone-wales defects on the mechanical behavior of graphene nano-ribbons. Comput Mater Sci 124:142–15010.1016/j.commatsci.2016.07.022 ↗
31. You H, Yue Yu, Silling S, D’Elia M (2022) A data-driven peridynamic continuum model for upscaling molecular dynamics. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 389:11440010.1016/j.cma.2021.114400 ↗
32. Zhang C, Zhou J, Zhang CW, Chen XF (2021) Effects of stone-wales and vacancy defects in fracture behavior of defective graphene. J Phys 1820:012126