A physical minimum dissipative energy-based damage model for crack growth simulation of geoengineering structures
Source abstract
Abstract
A damage model and simulation method are developed to simulate fracture process of geoengineering structures by using the continuum damage mechanics. The main contribution of this study is that the principle of minimum dissipative energy is used to develop the damage model, in which each parameter has an explicit physics meaning. Thus the competitive crack growth process of geoengineering structures can be simulated by using the developed method, which can consider the stress redistribution during simulation within a loading step. Two numerical examples are implemented by using the developed model and method, and the predicted crack growth path matched well with the experiment results. The results supported that the developed damage model and method can be expected to be an effective numerical tool to predict failure path and evaluate structural safety of geoengineering structures.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Rock Mechanics and Modeling · Landslides and related hazards · Fatigue and fracture mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (79)
Show source-provided references
1. Andrade FXC, de Cesar Sá JMA, Andrade Pires FM (2011) A ductile damage nonlocal model of integral-type at finite strains: formulation and numerical issues. Int J Damage Mech 20(4):515–55710.1177/1056789510386850 ↗
2. Azadi H, Khoei AR (2011) Numerical simulation of multiple crack growth in brittle materials with adaptive remeshing. Int J Numer Meth Eng 85(8):1017–104810.1002/nme.3002 ↗
3. Bai YL, Wei YJ, Xia MF et al (2000) Weibull modulus for diverse strength due to sample-specificity. Theoret Appl Fract Mech 34(3):211–21610.1016/S0167-8442(00)00037-9 ↗
4. Bai YL, Wang HY, Xia MF et al (2005) Statistical mesomechanics of solid, linking coupled multiple space and time scales. Appl Mech Rev 58(6):372–38810.1115/1.2048654 ↗
5. Bai QS, Tu SH, Zhang C (2016) DEM investigation of the fracture mechanism of rock disc containing hole (s) and its influence on tensile strength. Theoret Appl Fract Mech 86:197–21610.1016/j.tafmec.2016.07.005 ↗
6. Bazant ZP, Cedolin L (1979) Blunt crack band propagation in finite element analysis ASCE. J Eng Mech Div 105:297–31510.1061/JMCEA3.0002467 ↗
7. Bidadi J, Akbardoost J, Aliha MRM (2019) Thickness effect on the mode III fracture resistance and fracture path of rock using ENDB specimens. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct10.1111/ffe.13121 ↗
8. Bobet A (2000) The initiation of secondary cracks in compression. Eng Fract Mech 66(2):187–21910.1016/S0013-7944(00)00009-6 ↗
9. Bobet A, Einstein HH (1998) Fracture coalescence in rock-type materials under uniaxial and biaxial compression. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 35(7):863–88810.1016/S0148-9062(98)00005-9 ↗
10. Cai M, Brown ET (2017) Challenges in the mining and utilization of deep mineral resources. Engineering 3(4):432–43310.1016/J.ENG.2017.04.027 ↗
11. Chaboche JL (1981) Continuous damage mechanics—a tool to describe phenomena before crack initiation. Nucl Eng Des 64(2):233–24710.1016/0029-5493(81)90007-8 ↗
12. Chaboche JL (1988) Continuum damage mechanics: Part I—general concepts. J Appl Mech 55(1):59–6410.1115/1.3173661 ↗
13. Chen G, He M, Fan F (2018) Rock burst analysis using DDA numerical simulation. Int J Geomech 18(3):0401800110.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001055 ↗
14. Cheng Y, Jiao YY, Tan F (2019) Numerical and experimental study on the cracking behavior of marble with En-Echelon flaws. Rock Mech Rock Eng 52(11):4319–433810.1007/s00603-019-01849-x ↗
15. Cherkaev A, Ryvkin M (2019a) Damage propagation in 2d beam lattices: 1. Uncertainty and assumptions. Arch Appl Mech 89(3):485–50110.1007/s00419-018-1429-z ↗
16. Cherkaev A, Ryvkin M (2019b) Damage propagation in 2d beam lattices. 2 Design of an isotropic fault-tolerant lattice. Arch Appl Mech 89(3):503–51910.1007/s00419-018-1428-0 ↗
17. De Silva VRS, Ranjith PG, Perera MSA et al (2019) The influence of admixtures on the hydration process of soundless cracking demolition agents (SCDA) for fragmentation of saturated deep geological reservoir rock formations. Rock Mech Rock Eng 52(2):435–45410.1007/s00603-018-1596-9 ↗
18. Do TN, Wu JH (2020) Simulating a mining-triggered rock avalanche using DDA: A case study in Nattai North, Australia. Eng Geol 264:10538610.1016/j.enggeo.2019.105386 ↗
19. Eftekhari M, Baghbanan A, Hashemolhosseini H (2016) Crack propagation in rock specimen under compressive loading using extended finite element method. Arab J Geosci 9(2):14510.1007/s12517-015-2196-6 ↗
20. Fakhimi A, Norouzi S (2019) Dilation angle in bonded particle simulation of rock. Comput Particle Mech 6(2):195–21110.1007/s40571-018-0208-5 ↗
21. Fattahi H (2017) Applying soft computing methods to predict the uniaxial compressive strength of rocks from schmidt hammer rebound values. Comput Geosci 21(4):665–68110.1007/s10596-017-9642-3 ↗
22. González JM, Zárate F, Oñate E (2018) Pulse fracture simulation in shale rock reservoirs: DEM and FEM–DEM approaches. Comput Particle Mech 5(3):355–37310.1007/s40571-017-0174-3 ↗
23. Griffith AA (1921) The phenomena of rupture and flow in solids philosophical transactions of the royal society of london a: mathematical. Phys Eng Sci 221:163–198
24. Gu XB, Wu QH, Zhu YH (2019) The experimental investigation on the propagation process of crack for brittle rock similar material. Geotech Geol Eng 37(6):4731–474010.1007/s10706-019-00934-w ↗
25. Haeri H, Shahriar K, FatehiMarji M et al (2014) On the crack propagation analysis of rock like Brazilian disc specimens containing cracks under compressive line loading. Latin Am J Solids Struct 11(8):1400–141610.1590/S1679-78252014000800007 ↗
26. Heider Y, Markert B (2017) A phase-field modeling approach of hydraulic fracture in saturated porous media. Mech Res Commun 80:38–4610.1016/j.mechrescom.2016.07.002 ↗
27. Hillerborg A, Modéer M, Petersson PE (1976) Analysis of crack formation and crack growth in concrete by means of fracture mechanics and finite elements. Cem Concr Res 6:773–78110.1016/0008-8846(76)90007-7 ↗
28. Huang YH, Yang SQ, Tian WL (2019) Crack coalescence behavior of sandstone specimen containing two pre-existing flaws under different confining pressures. Theoret Appl Fract Mech 99:118–13010.1016/j.tafmec.2018.11.013 ↗
29. Irwin G (1957) Analysis of stresses and strains near the end of a crack traversing a plate. J Appl Mech 1957(24):361–36410.1115/1.4011547 ↗
30. Kachanov LM (1958) Time of the rupture process under creep conditions, Izy Akad. Nank SSR Otd Tech Nauk 8:26–31
31. Khandelwal M, Ranjith PG (2017) Study of crack propagation in concrete under multiple loading rates by acoustic emission. Geomech Geophys Geo-Energy Geo-Resour 3(4):393–40410.1007/s40948-017-0067-1 ↗
32. Lee J, Hong JW (2019) Morphological aspects of crack growth in rock materials with various flaws. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 43(10):1854–186610.1002/nag.2938 ↗
33. Lemaitre J (1996) A course on damage mechanics. Springer, Berlin10.1007/978-3-642-18255-6 ↗
34. Li G, Tang CA, Liang ZZ (2017) Development of a parallel FE simulator for modeling the whole trans-scale failure process of rock from meso- to engineering-scale. Comput Geosci 98:73–8610.1016/j.cageo.2016.08.014 ↗
35. Li M, Han S, Zhou S et al (2018) An improved computing method for 3D mechanical connectivity rates based on a polyhedral simulation model of discrete fracture network in rock masses. Rock Mech Rock Eng 51(6):1789–180010.1007/s00603-018-1423-3 ↗
36. Li Q, Zhao GF, Lian J (2019a) Further development of the distinct lattice spring model for quasi-brittle crack propagation in concrete and its application in underground engineering. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 92:10306110.1016/j.tust.2019.103061 ↗
37. Li G, Cheng XF, Pu H et al (2019b) Damage smear method for rock failure process analysis. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 11(6):1151–116510.1016/j.jrmge.2019.06.007 ↗
38. Li X, Gao W, Liu W (2019c) A mesh objective continuum damage model for quasi-brittle crack modelling and finite element implementation. Int J Damage Mech 105678951882387610.1177/1056789518823876 ↗
39. Lian JJ, Li Q, Deng XF et al (2018) A numerical study on toppling failure of a jointed rock slope by using the distinct lattice spring model. Rock Mech Rock Eng 51(2):513–53010.1007/s00603-017-1323-y ↗
40. Liu Q, Xu J, Liu X et al (2015) The role of flaws on crack growth in rock-like material assessed by AE technique. Int J Fract 193(2):99–11510.1007/s10704-015-0021-6 ↗
41. Liu L, Ji H, Elsworth D et al (2020) Dual-damage constitutive model to define thermal damage in rock. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 126:10418510.1016/j.ijrmms.2019.104185 ↗
42. Ma L, Yari N, Wiercigroch M (2018) Shear stress triggering brittle shear fracturing of rock-like materials. Int J Mech Sci 146:295–30210.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.07.008 ↗
43. Markov A, Kanaun S (2014) An efficient homogenization method for elastic media with multiple cracks. Int J Eng Sci 82:205–22110.1016/j.ijengsci.2014.05.016 ↗
44. Martowicz A (2017) Peridynamics for damage modelling and propagation via numerical simulations. Diagnostyka 18(1):73–78
45. Norat RCC, da Costa ML (2019) Characterization, usage and provenance of building rocks in the Fortress of São José of Macapá (Amazon, Brazil). Eng Geol 253:214–22810.1016/j.enggeo.2019.03.022 ↗
46. Ofoegbu GI, Smart KJ (2019) Modeling discrete fractures in continuum analysis and insights for fracture propagation and mechanical behavior of fractured rock. Results Eng 4:10007010.1016/j.rineng.2019.100070 ↗
47. Peerlings RHJ, de Borst R, Brekelmans WAM et al (1996) Gradient enhanced damage for quasi-brittle materials. Int J Numer Methods Eng 39(19):3391–340310.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19961015)39:19<3391::AID-NME7>3.0.CO;2-D ↗
48. Pezeshki M, Loehnert S, Wriggers P et al (2018) 3D dynamic crack propagation by the extended finite element method and a gradient-enhanced damage model[M]//Multiscale modeling of heterogeneous structures. Springer, Cham, pp 277–299
49. Rabczuk T, Ren H (2017) A peridynamics formulation for quasi-static fracture and contact in rock. Eng Geol 225:42–4810.1016/j.enggeo.2017.05.001 ↗
50. Ramsey JM, Chester FM (2004) Hybrid fracture and the transition from extension fracture to shear fracture. Nature 428(6978):6310.1038/nature02333 ↗
51. Ray P (2018) Statistical physics perspective of fracture in brittle and quasi-brittle materials. Philos Trans R Soc A 377(2136):2017039610.1098/rsta.2017.0396 ↗
52. Rice JR (1968) A path independent integral and the approximate analysis of strain concentration by notches and cracks. J Appl Mech 35:379–38610.1115/1.3601206 ↗
53. Sagong M, Bobet A (2002) Coalescence of multiple flaws in a rock-model material in uniaxial compression. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 39(2):229–24110.1016/S1365-1609(02)00027-8 ↗
54. Shi T, Leung CKY (2017) Minimum energy based method to predict the multiple cracking pattern in quasi-brittle beam. Int J Solids Struct 117:1–1310.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.04.019 ↗
55. Sun B (2018) A continuum model for damage evolution simulation of the high strength bridge wires due to corrosion fatigue. J Constr Steel Res 146:76–8310.1016/j.jcsr.2018.03.031 ↗
56. Sun B (2020) A computational method for two/three dimensional competitive fracture process simulation of rock-like materials due to cracking. Arab J Geosci 13:103110.1007/s12517-020-06036-9 ↗
57. Sun B, Li Z (2016a) Adaptive mesh refinement FEM for seismic damage evolution in concrete-based structures. Eng Struct 115:155–16410.1016/j.engstruct.2016.02.021 ↗
58. Sun B, Li Z (2016b) Adaptive concurrent three-level multiscale simulation for trans-scale process from material mesodamage to structural failure of concrete structures. Int J Damage Mech 25(5):750–76910.1177/1056789516648371 ↗
59. Sun B, Xu ZD (2020) A minimum Lemaitre’s damage strain energy release rate-based model for competitive fracture process simulation of quasi-brittle materials. Theoret Appl Fract Mech 109:10270510.1016/j.tafmec.2020.102705 ↗
60. Sun B, Wang X, Li Z (2015) Meso-scale image-based modeling of reinforced concrete and adaptive multi-scale analyses on damage evolution in concrete structures. Comput Mater Sci 110:39–5310.1016/j.commatsci.2015.07.050 ↗
61. Sun B, Huang X, Zheng Y et al (2020) Multi-scale lattice method for mesoscopic crack growth simulation of concrete structures. Theoret Appl Fract Mech 106:10247510.1016/j.tafmec.2020.102475 ↗
62. Tunsakul J, Jongpradist P, Kim HM et al (2018) Evaluation of rock fracture patterns based on the element-free Galerkin method for stability assessment of a highly pressurized gas storage cavern. Acta Geotech 13(4):817–83210.1007/s11440-017-0594-5 ↗
63. Wang Y, Zhou X, Xu X (2016) Numerical simulation of propagation and coalescence of flaws in rock materials under compressive loads using the extended non-ordinary state-based peridynamics. Eng Fract Mech 163:248–27310.1016/j.engfracmech.2016.06.013 ↗
64. Wang Y, Bui HH, Nguyen GD et al (2019a) A new SPH-based continuum framework with an embedded fracture process zone for modelling rock fracture. Int J Solids Struct 159:40–5710.1016/j.ijsolstr.2018.09.019 ↗
65. Wang Y, Han F, Lubineau G (2019b) A hybrid local/nonlocal continuum mechanics modeling and simulation of fracture in brittle materials. Comput Model Eng Sci 121(2):99–423
66. Wen T, Tang H, Huang L et al (2020) Energy evolution: A new perspective on the failure mechanism of purplish-red mudstones from the Three Gorges Reservoir area, China. Eng Geol 264:10535010.1016/j.enggeo.2019.105350 ↗
67. Wowk D, Alousis L, Underhill PR (2019) An adaptive remeshing technique for predicting the growth of irregular crack fronts using p-version finite element analysis. Eng Fract Mech 207:36–4710.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.12.002 ↗
68. Xu J, Li Z (2019) Crack propagation and coalescence of step-path failure in rocks. Rock Mech Rock Eng 52(4):965–97910.1007/s00603-018-1661-4 ↗
69. Xu J, Zheng Z, Xiao X et al (2018) Crack propagation and coalescence due to dual non-penetrating surface flaws and their effect on the strength of rock-like material. J Geophys Eng 15(3):938–95110.1088/1742-2140/aaa985 ↗
70. Yang L, Jiang Y, Li B et al (2012) Application of the expanded distinct element method for the study of crack growth in rock-like materials under uniaxial compression. Front Struct Civ Eng 6(2):121–131
71. Yun K, Wang Z, Chang M et al (2019) A computational methodology for simulating quasi-brittle fracture problems. Comput Struct 215:65–7910.1016/j.compstruc.2019.02.003 ↗
72. Zhang X, Bui TQ (2015) A fictitious crack XFEM with two new solution algorithms for cohesive crack growth modeling in concrete structures. Eng Comput 32(2):473–49710.1108/EC-08-2013-0203 ↗
73. Zhang XP, Wong LNY (2013) Crack initiation, propagation and coalescence in rock-like material containing two flaws: a numerical study based on bonded-particle model approach. Rock Mech Rock Eng 46(5):1001–102110.1007/s00603-012-0323-1 ↗
74. Zhang X, Zhang Q, Wu S (2017) Acoustic emission characteristics of the rock-like material containing a single flaw under different compressive loading rates. Comput Geotech 83:83–9710.1016/j.compgeo.2016.11.003 ↗
75. Zhou H, Liu D, Lei G et al (2018a) The creep-damage model of salt rock based on fractional derivative. Energies 11(9):234910.3390/en11092349 ↗
76. Zhou C, Xu C, Karakus M et al (2018b) A systematic approach to the calibration of micro-parameters for the flat-jointed bonded particle model. Geomech Eng 16(5):471–482
77. Zhou S, Zhuang X, Rabczuk T (2018c) A phase-field modeling approach of fracture propagation in poroelastic media. Eng Geol 240:189–20310.1016/j.enggeo.2018.04.008 ↗
78. Zhou G, Xu T, Heap MJ et al (2020) A three-dimensional numerical meso-approach to modeling time-independent deformation and fracturing of brittle rocks. Comput Geotech 117:10327410.1016/j.compgeo.2019.103274 ↗
79. Zhu WC, Wei J, Zhao J et al (2014) 2D numerical simulation on excavation damaged zone induced by dynamic stress redistribution. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 43:315–32610.1016/j.tust.2014.05.023 ↗