A fast algorithm to simulate the failure of a periodic elastic fibre composite
Source abstract
Abstract
Monte-Carlo simulations of the fracture of elastic unidirectional model fibre composites are an important tool to understand composite reliability. On account of being computationally intensive, fracture simulations reported in the literature have been limited to simulation patches comprised of a few thousand fibres. While these limited patch sizes suffice to capture the dominant failure event when the fibre strength variability is low (synthetic fibres), they suffer from edge effects when the fibre strength variability is high (natural fibres). On the basis of recent algorithmic developments based on Fourier acceleration, a novel bisection based Monte Carlo failure simulation algorithm is presently proposed. This algorithm is used to obtain empirical strength distributions for model composites comprised of up to $$220 \approx 10^6$$ fibres, and spanning a wide range of fibre strength variabilities. These simulations yield empirical weakest-link strength distributions well into the lower tail. A stochastic model is proposed for the weakest-link event. The strength distribution predicted by this model fits the empirical distributions for any fibre strength variability.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Composite Material Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. Alava MJ, Nukala PK, Zapperi S (2006) Statistical models of fracture. Adv Phys 55(3–4):349–47610.1080/00018730300741518 ↗
2. ASTM (2017) Standard test methods for tensile properties of polymer matrix composite materials. Standard D 3039, ASTM international, West Conshohocken, PA
3. Batrouni GG, Hansen A, Nelkin M (1986) Fourier acceleration of relaxation processes in disordered systems. Phys Rev Lett 57(11):133610.1103/PhysRevLett.57.1336 ↗
4. Beyerlein IJ, Phoenix SL, Sastry AM (1996) Comparison of shear-lag theory and continuum fracture mechanics for modeling fiber and matrix stresses in an elastic cracked composite lamina. Int J Solids Struct 33(18):2543–257410.1016/0020-7683(95)00172-7 ↗
5. Cormen T, Leiserson C, Rivest R, Stein C (2001) Introduction To algorithms. MIT Press, Cambridge
6. Curtin W (1998) Size scaling of strength in heterogeneous materials. Phys Rev Lett 80(7):144510.1103/PhysRevLett.80.1445 ↗
7. Curtin W (2000) Dimensionality and size effects on the strength of fiber-reinforced composites. Compos Sci Technol 60(4):543–55110.1016/S0266-3538(99)00150-5 ↗
8. Daniels H (1945) The statistical theory of the strength of bundles of threads. I. Proc R Soc Lond A 183(995):405–43510.1098/rspa.1945.0011 ↗
9. Eaton JW, Bateman D, Hauberg S, Wehbring R (2015) GNU octave version 4.0.0 manual: a high-level interactive language for numerical computations. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform. URL http://www.gnu.org/software/octave/doc/interpreter
10. Fidelis MEA, Pereira TVC, Gomes OdFM, de Andrade Silva F, Toledo Filho RD (2013) The effect of fiber morphology on the tensile strength of natural fibers. J Mater Res Technol 2(2):149–15710.1016/j.jmrt.2013.02.003 ↗
11. Gücer D, Gurland J (1962) Comparison of the statistics of two fracture modes. J Mech Phys Solids 10(4):365–37310.1016/0022-5096(62)90007-8 ↗
12. Gupta A, Mahesh S, Keralavarma SM (2017a) A fast algorithm for the elastic fields due to a single fiber break in a periodic fiber-reinforced composite. Int J Fract 204(1):121–12710.1007/s10704-016-0173-z ↗
13. Gupta A, Mahesh S, Keralavarma SM (2017b) Strength distribution of large unidirectional composite patches with realistic load sharing. Phys Rev E 96:043,00210.1103/PhysRevE.96.043002 ↗
14. Gupta A, Mahesh S, Keralavarma SM (2018) A fast algorithm for the elastic fields due to interacting fibre breaks in a periodic fibre composite. Int J Fract 211(1–2):295–30310.1007/s10704-018-0274-y ↗
15. Habeeb CI, Mahesh S (2015) Strength distribution of planar local load-sharing bundles. Phys Rev E 92(2):022,12510.1103/PhysRevE.92.022125 ↗
16. Hedgepeth JM (1961) Stress concentrations in filamentary structures. Technical report TN D 882, NASA
17. Hedgepeth JM, Van Dyke P (1967) Local stress concentrations in imperfect filamentary composite materials. J Compos Mater 1(3):294–30910.1177/002199836700100305 ↗
18. Hull D, Clyne T (1996) An introduction to composite materials. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge10.1017/CBO9781139170130 ↗
19. Jawaid M, Khalil HA (2011) Cellulosic/synthetic fibre reinforced polymer hybrid composites: a review. Carbohydr Polym 86(1):1–1810.1016/j.carbpol.2011.04.043 ↗
20. Landis C, McMeeking R (1999) Stress concentrations in composites with interface sliding, matrix stiffness and uneven fiber spacing using shear lag theory. Int J Solids Struct 36(28):4333–436110.1016/S0020-7683(98)00193-0 ↗
21. Landis CM, Beyerlein IJ, McMeeking RM (2000) Micromechanical simulation of the failure of fiber reinforced composites. J Mech Phys Solids 48(3):621–64810.1016/S0022-5096(99)00051-4 ↗
22. Mahesh S, Mishra A (2018) Strength distribution of Ti/SiC metal-matrix composites under monotonic loading. Eng Fract Mech 194:86–10410.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.03.015 ↗
23. Mahesh S, Phoenix S (2004) Absence of a tough-brittle transition in the statistical fracture of unidirectional composite tapes under local load sharing. Phys Rev E 69(2):026,10210.1103/PhysRevE.69.026102 ↗
24. Mahesh S, Beyerlein IJ, Phoenix SL (1999) Size and heterogeneity effects on the strength of fibrous composites. Physica D Nonlinear Phenom 133(1):371–38910.1016/S0167-2789(99)00082-2 ↗
25. Mahesh S, Phoenix SL, Beyerlein IJ (2002) Strength distributions and size effects for 2D and 3D composites with weibull fibers in an elastic matrix. Int J Fract 115(1):41–8510.1023/A:1015729607223 ↗
26. McCartney L, Smith R (1983) Statistical theory of the strength of fiber bundles. J Appl Mech 50(3):601–60810.1115/1.3167097 ↗
27. Mishra A, Mahesh S (2017) A deformation-theory based model of a damaged metal matrix composite. Int J Solids Struct 121:228–23910.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.05.032 ↗
28. Okabe T, Takeda N (2002) Elastoplastic shear-lag analysis of single-fiber composites and strength prediction of unidirectional multi-fiber composites. Compos A 33(10):1327–133510.1016/S1359-835X(02)00170-7 ↗
29. Okabe T, Takeda N, Kamoshida Y, Shimizu M, Curtin W (2001) A 3D shear-lag model considering micro-damage and statistical strength prediction of unidirectional fiber-reinforced composites. Compos Sci Technol 61(12):1773–178710.1016/S0266-3538(01)00079-3 ↗
30. Smith R (1980) A probability model for fibrous composites with local load sharing. Proc R Soc Lond A 372(1751):539–55310.1098/rspa.1980.0129 ↗
31. Smith R, Phoenix S, Greenfield M, Henstenburg R, Pitt R (1983) Lower-tail approximations for the probability of failure of three-dimensional fibrous composites with hexagonal geometry. Proc R Soc Lond A 388(1795):353–39110.1098/rspa.1983.0087 ↗
32. Tange O (2011) Gnu parallel–the command-line power tool. Login USENIX Mag 36(1):42–47. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1630310.5281/zenodo.16303 ↗
33. Weibull W (1951) A statistical distribution function of wide applicability. J Appl Mech 103(730):293–29710.1115/1.4010337 ↗
34. Zhang J, Wang F (2009) Modeling of progressive failure in ductile matrix composites including local matrix yielding. Mech Adv Mater Struct 16(7):522–53510.1080/15376490903133384 ↗
35. Zhou S, Curtin W (1995) Failure of fiber composites: a lattice green function model. Acta Metall Mater 43(8):3093–310410.1016/0956-7151(95)00003-E ↗