journal article·2020-03Open access

Dynamic response of ductile materials containing cylindrical voids

Manoj Subramani, Christophe Czarnota, Sébastien Mercier, Alain Molinari

International Journal of Fracture· Volume 222· Issue 1-2

Abstract

The fracture of ductile materials is often the result of the nucleation, growth and coalescence of microscopic voids. In this thesis, we mainly focus on the dynamic void evolution in porous media containing cylindrical voids. This study covers a problem that is of particular interest in many areas of research (e.g. development of shock mitigation devices for civil or military applications). Owing to the development of additive manufacturing, the processing of porous material with cylindrical voids is an option to create lightweight materials having interesting properties in terms of energy dissipation. Therefore, our work aims at describing the dynamic response of architectured materials such as honeycomb structures. In dynamic loading, microvoids sustain an extremely rapid expansion which generates strong acceleration of particles in the vicinity of cavities. These micro-inertia effects are known to play a significant role in the macroscopic response and the development of damage in porous media. In fact, the overall macroscopic stress is found to be the sum of two contributions: a static term (micro-inertia independent term) and a dynamic term (micro-inertia dependent term), the latter being related to the microstructure (e.g. size and aspect ratio of voids). In our work, a cylindrical shell is adopted as a Representative Volume Element (internal and external radii a and b, length 2l) for the porous material. The static term is derived from a yield function available in the literature. The dynamic stress is evaluated analytically using a trial velocity field for cylindrical voids combined with the multi-scale approach developed in the literature in LEM3. It is shown that the dynamic stress is scaled by the mass density, two characteristic lengths of the voids, the porosity, the macroscopic strain rate tensor and the time derivative of the strain rate tensor. An important outcome of the model is the differential lengthscale effect which exists between in-plane and out of plane components of the macroscopic stress. Namely, it is observed for axisymmetric loading that in-plane dynamic stress components are only related to the void radius a while the out of plane stress component is linked to a and the length of the RVE, l. In the thesis, we present the dynamic response of the porous medium when subjected to various loading conditions: spherical loading, axisymmetric plane strain loading, uniaxial loading and biaxial loading. While for plane strain loading under quasi static condition, the overall axial stress is spherical, in dynamic conditions, the inertia contribution hinders the overall stress tensor from being spherical. Another important result of the proposed theory is the effect of the void length, which does not exist in quasi static conditions where the overall response is solely modulated by the porosity. The case of thin cylinders under dynamic loading reveals a peculiar damage kinetics. In fact, the damage developed in such porous materials results from an increase of the void radius and a reduction of the external radius. The void collapse for uniaxial as well as for biaxial loadings are new observations. The analytical model predictions are validated based on comparisons with finite element calculations (Abaqus/Explicit).
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Vibration and Dynamic Analysis · Metallurgy and Material Forming

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. Budiansky B, Hutchinson JW, Slutsky S (1982) Void growth and collapse in viscous solids. In: Hopkins HG, Sewell MJ (eds) Mechanics of solids. Pergamon Press, Oxford
2. Carroll MM, Holt AC (1972) Static and dynamic pore collapse relations for ductile porous materials. J Appl Phys 43(4):1626–163610.1063/1.1661372 ↗
3. Czarnota C, Mercier S, Molinari A (2006) Modelling of nucleation and void growth in dynamic pressure loading, application to spall test on tantalum. Int J Fract 141:177–19410.1007/s10704-006-0070-y ↗
4. Czarnota C, Jacques N, Mercier S, Molinari A (2008) Modelling of dynamic ductile fracture and application to the simulation of plate impact tests on tantalum. J Mech Phys Solids 56:1624–165010.1016/j.jmps.2007.07.017 ↗
5. Czarnota C, Molinari A, Mercier S (2017) The structure of steady shock waves in porous metals. J Mech Phys Solids 107:204–22810.1016/j.jmps.2017.06.005 ↗
6. Eftis J, Nemes JA (1992) Modelling of impact-induced spall fracture and post spall behavior of a circular plate. Int J Fract 53:301–32410.1007/BF00034179 ↗
7. Freund LB, Hutchinson JW, Lam PS (1986) Analysis of high-strain-rate elastic-plastic crack growth. Eng Fract Mech 23(1):119–12910.1016/0013-7944(86)90181-5 ↗
8. Glennie EB (1972) The dynamic growth of a void in a plastic material and application to fracture. J Mech Phys Solids 20:415–42910.1016/0022-5096(72)90018-X ↗
9. Gologanu M, Leblond JB, Devaux J (1993) Approximate models for ductile metals containing nonspherical voids—case of axisymmetric prolate ellipsoidal cavities. J Mech Phys Solids 41:1723–175410.1016/0022-5096(93)90029-F ↗
10. Gurson AL (1977) Continuum theory of ductile rupture by void nucleation and growth: part $$\rm I$$—yield criteria and flow rules for porous ductile media. J Eng Mater Technol 99:2–1510.1115/1.3443401 ↗
11. Jacques N, Czarnota C, Mercier S, Molinari A (2010) A micromechanical constitutive model for dynamic damage and fracture of ductile materials. Int J Fract 162:159–17510.1007/s10704-009-9436-2 ↗
12. Johnson JN (1981) Dynamic fracture and spallation in ductile solids. J Appl Phys 52:2812–282510.1063/1.329011 ↗
13. Klöcker H (1991) Analyse théorique de la croissance d’une cavité dans un matériau viscoplastique. Ph.D. thesis, Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Saint Etienne, France
14. Leblond J, Perrin G, Suquet P (1994) Exact results and approximate models for porous viscoplastic solids. Int J Plast 10(3):213–23510.1016/0749-6419(94)90001-9 ↗
15. Leblond JB, Roy G (2000) A model for dynamic ductile behavior applicable for arbitrary triaxialities. Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences 328(5):381–386
16. McClintock FM (1968) A criterion for ductile fracture by the growth of holes. J Appl Mech 35:363–37110.1115/1.3601204 ↗
17. Molinari A, Mercier S (2001) Micromechanical modelling of porous materials under dynamic loading. J Mech Phys Solids 49:1497–151610.1016/S0022-5096(01)00003-5 ↗
18. Molinari A, Jacques N, Mercier S, Leblond JB, Benzerga AA (2015) A micromechanical model for the dynamic behavior of porous media in the void coalescence stage. Int J Solids Struct 71:1–1810.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.05.003 ↗
19. Ortiz M, Molinari A (1992) Effect of strain hardening and rate sensitivity on the dynamic growth of a void in a plastic material. J Appl Mech 114:48–5310.1115/1.2899463 ↗
20. Plesset MS (1949) The dynamics of cavitation bubbles. J Appl Mech 16:222–28210.1115/1.4009975 ↗
21. Rayleigh JWS (1917) Pressure developped in a liquid during the collapse of a spherical cavity. Philo Mag 34:94–9810.1080/14786440808635681 ↗
22. Rice JR, Tracey D (1969) On the ductile enlargement of voids in triaxial stress fields. J Mech Phys Solids 17:201–21710.1016/0022-5096(69)90033-7 ↗
23. Roy G (2003) Vers une modélisation approfondie de l’endommagement ductile dynamique. Investigation expérimentale d’une nuance de tantale et développements théoriques. Ph.D. thesis, Ecole Nationale Supérieure de Mécanique et d’Aéronautique, Université de Poitiers, France
24. Sartori C, Mercier S, Jacques N, Molinari A (2015) Constitutive behavior of porous ductile materials accounting for micro-inertia and void shape. Mech Mater 80:324–33910.1016/j.mechmat.2013.12.006 ↗
25. Sartori C, Mercier S, Molinari A (2019) Analytical expression of mechanical fields for gurson type porous models. Int J Solids Struct 163:25–3910.1016/j.ijsolstr.2018.11.034 ↗
26. Simo JC, Hughes TJR (1998) Computational inelasticity, Interdisciplinary applied mathematics. Springer, Berlin
27. Tong W, Ravichandran G (1995) Inertial effects on void growth in porous viscoplastic materials. J Appl Mech 62:633–63910.1115/1.2895993 ↗
28. Torki M, Benzerga A, Leblond JB (2015) On void coalescence under combined tension and shear. J Inst Met 82(7):1–15
29. Torki M, Tekoglu C, Leblond JB, Benzerga A (2017) Theoretical and numerical analysis of void coalescence in porous ductile solids under arbitrary loadings. Int J Plast 91:160–18110.1016/j.ijplas.2017.02.011 ↗
30. Tracey DM (1971) Strain-hardening and interaction effects on the growth of voids in ductile fracture. Eng Fract Mech 3(3):301–31510.1016/0013-7944(71)90040-3 ↗
31. Versino D, Bronkhorst C (2018) A computationally efficient ductile damage model accounting for nucleation and micro-inertia at high triaxialities. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 333:395–42010.1016/j.cma.2018.01.028 ↗
32. Wang ZP (1994) Growth of voids in porous ductile materials at high strain rate. J Appl Phys 76:1535–154210.1063/1.357730 ↗
33. Wang ZP (1997) Void-containing nonlinear materials subject to high-rate loading. J Appl Phys 81:7213–722710.1063/1.365320 ↗
34. Wu XY, Ramesh KT, Wright TW (2003) The dynamic growth of a single void in a viscoplastic material under transient hydrostatic loading. J Mech Phys Solids 51:1–2610.1016/S0022-5096(02)00079-0 ↗