journal article·2000-04

Representation of crack-tip plasticity in pressure sensitive geomaterials

Panos Papanastasiou, Colin Atkinson

International Journal of Fracture· Volume 102· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

This paper presents a model based on dislocation theory for representation of crack tip plasticity in a pressure sensitive material. The basic equations are derived from a simple model of the crack tip plasticity which represents the plasticity by superdislocations placed at the effective centres of the complete slip process distributed around the crack tip. The positions and strengths of the superdislocations are determined by imposing the following conditions: (i) the total stress-intensity factor at the crack tip is zero (ii) the total stress minus the self stress of the superdislocation acting at the superdislocation position is just equal to the friction stress due to the Mohr-Coulomb yield criterion and (iii) the total crack opening displacement produced by the model is maximized. Condition (iii) enables the angle of the slip band on which the superdislocation lies to be determined. The results are presented in a dimensionless form allowing the discussion of particular cases and the recognition of the dominant parameters. A series of parametric studies are carried out to demonstrate that the model can capture the essentials of the crack tip plasticity.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (9)

Show source-provided references
1. Atkinson, C. and Kanninen, M.F. (1977). A simple representation of crack tip plasticity: The inclined strip-yield superdislocation model. International Journal of Fracture 13, 151–163.10.1007/BF00042557 ↗
2. Atkinson, C. and Kay, T.R. (1971). A simple model of relaxation at a crack tip. Acta Metallurgica 19, 679–683.10.1016/0001-6160(71)90022-8 ↗
3. Atkinson, C. and Clements, D.L. (1973). The influence of anisotropy and crystalline slip on relaxation at a crack tip. Acta Metallurgica 21, 55–60.10.1016/0001-6160(73)90219-8 ↗
4. Jagannadhan K. and Marcinkowski M.J. (1982). Unified Theory of Fracture. Aedermonnsdorf: Trans Tech, Materials science survey, no. 1.
5. Van Dam, D.B., De Pater, C.J. and Romijn, R. (1998). Analysis of hydraulic fracture closure in laboratory experiments. Proceedings of the SPE/ISRM Rock Mechanics in Petroleum Engineering,Trondheim, Norway, 2, 365–374.
6. England, A.H. (1971). Complex Variable Methods in Elasticity, Wiley.
7. Papanastasiou, P. and Thiercelin, M. (1993). Influence of inelastic rock behaviour in hydraulic fracturing. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences 30(7), (1993), 1241–1247.10.1016/0148-9062(93)90102-J ↗
8. Papanastasiou, P. (1997). The influence of plasticity in hydraulic fracturing. International Journal of Fracture 84, 61–79.10.1023/A:1007336003057 ↗
9. Papanastasiou, P. (1999). The effective fracture toughness in hydraulic fracturing. International Journal of Fracture 96, 127–147.10.1023/A:1018676212444 ↗