journal article·2013-09Open access

A practical approach for the separation of interfacial toughness and structural plasticity in a delamination growth experiment

M. Kolluri, J. P. M. Hoefnagels, J. A. W. Dommelen, M. G. D. Geers

International Journal of Fracture· Volume 183· Issue 1

Abstract

Interfacial delamination is a key reliability challenge in composites and micro-electronic systems due to (high density) integration of dissimilar materials. Predictive finite element models require the input of interface properties, often determined with an interface delamination growth experiment with (nearly) constant process zone, relying on the assumption of no permanent deformation in the sample structure layers. However, much evidence in the literature exists that plasticity often does occur in the sample structure during delamination experiments, which should be adequately dealt with to obtain the real interface fracture toughness that is independent of the thickness of the two sample arms. This paper presents a practical approach for the separation of interfacial toughness and structural plasticity in a delamination growth experiment on a double-cantilever beam specimen involving only small-scale plasticity at the interface. The procedure does not require knowledge of the constitutive behavior of the adherent layers. It only deals with the separation of structural plasticity in the adherents, whereas smallscale plasticity in connection with ductile interface fracture is lumped into the interface fracture toughness. The proposed approach was numerically verified for one set of parameters. Experimental assessment of the approach on industrially-relevant copper lead frame–molding compound epoxy interface structures showed a correction of the interface fracture toughness of more than a factor of two, demonstrating the potentially significant errors induced by plastic deformation of the sample structure during delamination experiments.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. Andersson T, Stigh U (2004) The stress–elongation relation for an adhesive layer loaded in peel using equilibrium of energetic forces. Int J Solids Struct 41:413–43410.1016/j.ijsolstr.2003.09.039 ↗
2. Biel A, Stigh U (2010) Damage and plasticity in adhesive layer: an experimental study. Int J Fract 165:93–10310.1007/s10704-010-9508-3 ↗
3. Blanco N, Turon A, Costa J (2006) An exact solution for the determination of the mode mixture in the mixed-mode bending delamination test. Compos Sci Technol 66:1256–125810.1016/j.compscitech.2005.10.028 ↗
4. Davidson BD, Sundararaman V (1996) A single leg bending test for interfacial fracture toughness determination. Int J Fract 78:193–21010.1007/BF00034525 ↗
5. Davies GAO, Hitchings D, Ankersen J (2006) Predicting delamination and de-bonding in modern aerospace composite structures. Compos Sci Technol 66:846–85410.1016/j.compscitech.2004.12.043 ↗
6. Kim JK, Mai YW (1991) High strength, high fracture toughness fibre composites with interface control—a review. Compos Sci Technol 41(4):333–37810.1016/0266-3538(91)90072-W ↗
7. Kolluri M (2011) An in-situ experimental-numerical approach for interface delamination characterization. PhD thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology, Netherlands. ISBN: 978-90-77172-75-9
8. Kolluri M, Thissen MHL, Hoefnagels JPM, van Dommelen JAW, Geers MGD (2009) In-situ characterization of interface delamination by a new miniature mixed mode bending setup. Int J Fract 158:183–19510.1007/s10704-009-9356-1 ↗
9. Kolluri M, Hoefnagels JPM, van Dommelen JAW, Geers MGD (2011) An improved miniature mixed mode delamination setup for in-situ microscopic interface failure analyses. J Phys D Appl Phys 44:1–1310.1088/0022-3727/44/3/034005 ↗
10. Rikards R, Buchholz FG, Wang H, Bledzki AK, Korjakin A, Richard HA (1998) Investigation of mixed mode I/II interlaminar fracture toughness of the laminated composites by using a CTS type specimen. Eng Fract Mech 61:325–34210.1016/S0013-7944(98)00068-X ↗
11. Salomonsson K, Stigh U (2008) An adhesive interphase element for structural analyses. Int J Numer Methods Eng 76:482–50010.1002/nme.2333 ↗
12. Soboyejo WO, Lu GY, Chengalva S, Zhang J, Kenner V (1999) A modified mixed-mode bending specimen for the interfacial fracture testing of dissimilar materials. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 22:799–81010.1046/j.1460-2695.1999.t01-1-00203.x ↗
13. Suo Z, Bao G, Fan B (1992) Delamination r-curve phenomena due to damage. J Mech Phys Solids 40:1–1610.1016/0022-5096(92)90198-B ↗
14. Thijsse J, van der Sluis O, van Dommelen JAW, van Driel WD, Geers MGD (2008) Characterization of semiconductor interfaces using a modified mixed mode bending apparatus. Microelectron Reliab 48:401–40710.1016/j.microrel.2007.06.003 ↗
15. Thouless MD, Kafkalidis MS, Adams JL, Ward SM, Dickie RA, Westerbeek GL (1998) Determining the toughness of adhesives in plastically-deforming joints. J Mater Sci 33:189–19710.1023/A:1004370318709 ↗
16. Todoroki A, Tanaka M, Shimamura Y (2005) Electrical resistance change method for monitoring delamination of CFRP laminates: effect of spacing between electrodes. Compos Sci Technol 65:37–4610.1016/j.compscitech.2004.05.018 ↗
17. Tvergaard V, Hutchinson JW (1992) The relation between crack growth resistance and fracture process parameters in elastic–plastic solids. J Mech Phys Solids 40:1377–139710.1016/0022-5096(92)90020-3 ↗
18. Tvergaard V, Hutchinson JW (1993) The influence of plasticity on mixed mode interface toughness. J Mech Phys Solids 41:1119–113510.1016/0022-5096(93)90057-M ↗
19. Tvergaard V, Hutchinson JW (1996) On the toughness of ductile adhesive joints. J Mech Phys Solids 44:789–80010.1016/0022-5096(96)00011-7 ↗
20. van der Sluis O, Engelen RAB, van Silfhout RBR, van Driel WD, van Gils MAJ (2007) Efficient damage sensitivity analysis of advanced Cu/low-k bond pad structures by means of the area release energy criterion. Microelectron Reliab 47:1975–198210.1016/j.microrel.2007.04.004 ↗
21. van Driel WD, van Gils MAJ, van Silfhout RBR, Zhang GQ (2005) Prediction of delamination related IC and packaging reliability problems. Microelectron Reliab 45:1633–163810.1016/j.microrel.2005.07.065 ↗
22. Valoroso N, Fedele R (2010) Characterization of a cohesive-zone model describing damage and de-cohesion at bonded interfaces. sensitivity analysis and mode-I parameter identification. Int J Solids Struct 47:1666–167710.1016/j.ijsolstr.2010.03.001 ↗
23. Wei Y, Hutchinson JW (1997) Nonlinear delamination mechanics for thin films. J Mech Phys Solids 45:1137–115910.1016/S0022-5096(96)00122-6 ↗
24. Wei Y, Hutchinson JW (1998) Interface strength, work of adhesion and plasticity in the peel test. Int J Fract 93:315–33310.1023/A:1007545200315 ↗
25. Yang QD, Thouless MD, Ward SM (1999) Numerical simulations of adhesively-bonded beams failing with extensive plastic deformation. J Mech Phys Solids 47:1337–135310.1016/S0022-5096(98)00101-X ↗
26. Yang QD, Thouless MD (2001) Mixed-mode fracture analyses of plastically-deforming adhesive joints. Int J Fract 110: 175–18710.1023/A:1010869706996 ↗