journal article·2014-01

Probability density distribution of the orientation of strength-controlling flaws from multiaxial loading using the unit-sphere stochastic strength model for anisotropy

Noel N. Nemeth

International Journal of Fracture· Volume 185· Issue 1-2
Publisher page

Abstract

Models that predict the failure probability of monolithic glass and ceramic components under multiaxial loading have been developed by authors such as Batdorf, Evans, and Matsuo. These “unit-sphere” failure models assume that the strength-controlling flaws are randomly oriented, noninteracting planar microcracks of specified geometry but of variable size. The purpose of this paper is to describe a formulation of the probability density distribution of the orientation of critical strength-controlling flaws that results from an applied load. This distribution is a function of the multiaxial stress state, the shear sensitivity of the flaws, the Weibull modulus, and the strength anisotropy. Examples are provided showing the predicted response on the unit sphere for various stress states for isotropic and transversely isotropic (anisotropic) materials—including the most probable orientation of critical flaws for offset uniaxial loads with strength anisotropy. The author anticipates that this information could be used to determine anisotropic stiffness degradation or anisotropic damage evolution for individual brittle (or quasi-brittle) composite material constituents within finite element or micromechanics-based software.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Rock Mechanics and Modeling · Numerical methods in engineering · Structural Analysis of Composite Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. Aboudi J (1995) Micromechanical analysis of thermo-inelastic multiphase short-fiber composites. Compos Eng 5(7):839–85010.1016/0961-9526(95)93123-D ↗
2. Aboudi J, Pindera M-J, Arnold SM (2003) Higher-order theory for periodic multiphase materials with inelastic phases. Int J Plast 19:805–84710.1016/S0749-6419(02)00007-4 ↗
3. Batdorf SB (1973) A statistical theory for the fracture of transversely isotropic brittle materials of moderate anisotropy. Air Force Report SAMSO-TR-73-361, Aerospace Report TR-0074(4450-76)-1, NTIS AD-770982
4. Batdorf SB (1978a) Fracture statistics of polyaxial stress states. In: Nicholas Perrone (ed) Fracture mechanics. University Press of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, pp 579–591
5. Batdorf SB (1978b) New light on Weibull theory. Nucl Eng Des 47:267–27210.1016/0029-5493(78)90069-9 ↗
6. Batdorf SB, Crose JG (1974) A statistical theory for the fracture of brittle structures subjected to nonuniform polyaxial stresses. J Appl Mech 41(2):459–46410.1115/1.3423310 ↗
7. Batdorf SB, Heinisch HL Jr (1978) Weakest link theory reformulated for arbitrary fracture criterion. J Am Ceram Soc 61(78):355–35810.1111/j.1151-2916.1978.tb09327.x ↗
8. Bednarcyk BA, Arnold SM (2002) MAC/GMC 4.0 user’s manual–keywords manual. NASA/TM-212077/VOL2 http://ntrs.nasa.gov/
9. Buch JD, Crose JG, Robinson EY (1977) Failure criteria in graphite program. AFML-TR-77-16 Available from the Air Force Material Laboratory
10. Cady C, Heredia FE, Evans AG (1995) In-plane mechanical properties of several ceramic-matrix composites. J Am Ceram Soc 78(8):2065–207810.1111/j.1151-2916.1995.tb08618.x ↗
11. Erdogan F, Sih GC (1963) On the crack extension in plates under plane loading and transverse shear. J Basic Eng 85–86:519–52510.1115/1.3656897 ↗
12. Evans AG (1978) A general approach for the statistical analysis of multiaxial fracture. J Am Ceram Soc 61(7–8):302–30810.1111/j.1151-2916.1978.tb09314.x ↗
13. Hellen TK, Blackburn WS (1975) The calculation of stress intensity factors for combined tensile and shear loading. Int J Fract 11(4):605–61710.1007/BF00116368 ↗
14. Ichikawa M (1991) Proposal of an approximate analytical expression of maximum energy release rate of a mixed mode crack in relation to reliability evaluation of ceramic components. J Soc Mat Sci Jpn 40:224–22710.2472/jsms.40.224 ↗
15. Lutz G (2006) The Puck theory of failure in laminates in the context of the new guideline VDI2014 part 3. In: Conference on damage in composite materials 2006, Stuttgart, Germany
16. Lynch CS, Evans AG (1996) Effects of off-axis loading on the tensile behavior of a ceramic-matrix composite. J Am Ceram Soc 79(12):3113–312310.1111/j.1151-2916.1996.tb08085.x ↗
17. Matsuo Y (1981) A probabilistic analysis of the brittle fracture loci under bi-axial stress state: 1st report in the case of tension Being Dominant. Bull JSME 24(188):290–29410.1299/jsme1958.24.290 ↗
18. Nemeth NN (2013a) Unit-sphere multiaxial stochastic-strength model applied to anisotropic and composite materials. NASA/TP-2013-217749 http://ntrs.nasa.gov/
19. Nemeth NN (2013b) Unit-sphere anisotropic multiaxial stochastic-strength model probability density distribution for the orientation of critical flaws. NASA/TM-2013-217810 http://ntrs.nasa.gov/
20. Nemeth NN (2014) Unit-sphere multiaxial stochastic-strength model applied to a composite material. J Comp Mat (article in press)10.1177/0021998313509865 ↗
21. Nemeth NN et al (2003) CARES/Life ceramics analysis and reliability evaluation of structures life prediction program. NASA/TM-2003-106316 http://ntrs.nasa.gov/
22. Nemeth NN, Gyekenyesi JP, Jadaan OM (2005) Lifetime reliability prediction of ceramic structures under transient thermomechanical loads. NASA/TP-2005-212505 http://ntrs.nasa.gov/
23. Shetty DK (1987) Mixed-mode fracture criteria for reliability analysis and design with structural ceramics. J Eng Gas Turbines Power 109(3):282–28910.1115/1.3240037 ↗
24. Weibull W (1939) A statistical theory of the strength of materials. Ingeniorsvetenskapsakademiens Handlingar 151