Independent cover meshless method using a polynomial approximation
Source abstract
Abstract
In this paper, a novel independent cover meshless method (ICMM) is presented for the analyses of two dimensional linear elastic solids and the simulation of crack propagation. In the ICMM, the Delaunay criterion is employed to dynamically construct the non-overlapping independent nodal cover for each discrete node of analysis domain, and the virtual crack closure technique is used to calculate the stress intensity factors. The ICMM has the definite nodal cover (or nodal influence domain) and employs the general polynomial function to interpolate the nodal cover, which results in a simple formulation and numerical implementation, and facilitates the accurate numerical integration of the equilibrium equation and the enforcement of the boundary conditions. It well solves the problem of the general meshless methods interpolated by rational functions, and has a wide application prospective in practical engineering. Several representative numerical examples demonstrate the convergence, accuracy and robustness of the present method.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Numerical methods in engineering · Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. Anderson TL (2005) Fracture mechanics: fundamentals and applications. CRC Press, Boca Raton10.1201/9781420058215 ↗
2. Augarde CE, Deeks AJ (2008) The use of Timoshenko’s exact solution for a cantilever beam in adaptive analysis. Finite Elem Anal Des 44:595–60110.1016/j.finel.2008.01.010 ↗
3. Belytschko T, Lu YY, Gu L (1994) Element-free Galerkin method. Int J Numer Methods Eng 37:229–25610.1002/nme.1620370205 ↗
4. Belytschko T, Krongauz Y, Organ D, Fleming M, Krysl P (1996) Meshless methods: an overview and recent developments. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 139:3–4710.1016/S0045-7825(96)01078-X ↗
5. Belytschko T, Xiao SP (2003) Coupling methods for continuum model with molecular model. Int J Multiscale Comput Eng 1:115–12610.1615/IntJMultCompEng.v1.i1.100 ↗
6. Bittencourt TN, Wawrzynek PA, Ingraffea AR et al (1996) Quasi-automatic simulation of crack propagation for 2D LEFM problems. Eng Fract Mech 55:321–33410.1016/0013-7944(95)00247-2 ↗
7. Budarapu PR, Gracie R, Bordas SPA, Rabczuk T (2014a) An adaptive multiscale method for quasi-static crack growth. Comput Mech 53:1129–114810.1007/s00466-013-0952-6 ↗
8. Budarapu PR, Gracie R, Yang SW, Zhuang XY, Rabczuk T (2014b) Efficient coarse graining in multiscale modeling of fracture. Theor Appl Fract Mech 69:126–14310.1016/j.tafmec.2013.12.004 ↗
9. Budyn ERL (2004) Multiple crack growth by the extended finite element method. Dissertation, Northweastern University
10. Cai YC, Zhu HH (2010) A PU-based meshless Shepard interpolation method satisfying delta property. Eng Anal Bound Elem 34:9–1610.1016/j.enganabound.2009.07.007 ↗
11. Cai YC, Zhu HH, Zhuang XY (2013) A continuous/discontinuous deformation analysis (CDDA) method based on deformable blocks for fracture modeling. Front Struct Civ Eng 7:369–37810.1007/s11709-013-0222-x ↗
12. Chen YZ, Hasebe N (1995) New integration scheme for the branch crack problem. Eng Fract Mech 52:791–80110.1016/0013-7944(95)00052-W ↗
13. Cook RD, Malkus DS, Plesha ME (1989) Concepts and applications of finite element analysis, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York
14. Erdogan F, Sih GC (1963) On the crack extension in plates under plane loading and transverse shear. J Fluid Eng 85:519–525
15. Gu L (2003) Moving kriging interpolation and element-free Galerkin method. Int J Numer Methods Eng 56:1–1110.1002/nme.553 ↗
16. Khoei AR, Yasbolaghi R, Biabanaki SOR (2015) A polygonal finite element method for modeling crack propagation with minimum remeshing. Int J Fract 194:123–14810.1007/s10704-015-0044-z ↗
17. Lancaster P, Salkauskas K (1981) Surfaces generated by moving least squares methods. Math Comput 37:141–15810.1090/S0025-5718-1981-0616367-1 ↗
18. Liu WK, Han W, Lu H, Li S, Cao J (2004) Reproducing kernel element method. Part I: Theoretical formulation. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 19:933–951
19. Liu WK, Park HS, Qian D, Karpov EG, Kadowaki H, Wagner GJ (2006) Bridging scale methods for nanomechanics and materials. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 195:1407–142110.1016/j.cma.2005.05.042 ↗
20. Miller RE, Tadmor EB (2002) The quasicontinuum method: overview, applications and current directions. J Comput Aided Mater Des 9:203–23910.1023/A:1026098010127 ↗
21. Nayroles B, Touzot G, Villon P (1992) Generalizing the finite element method: diffuse approximation and diffuse elements. Comput Mech 10:307–31810.1007/BF00364252 ↗
22. Nguyena VP, Rabczuk T, Bordas S, Duflot M (2008) Meshless methods: a review and computer implementation aspects. Math Comput Simulat 79:763–81310.1016/j.matcom.2008.01.003 ↗
23. Rabczuk T, Belytschko T (2004) Cracking particles: a simplified meshfree method for arbitrary evolving cracks. Int J Numer Methods Eng 61:2316–234310.1002/nme.1151 ↗
24. Rabczuk T, Zi G, Bordas S, Hung NX (2010) A simple and robust three-dimensional cracking-particle method without enrichment. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 199:2437–245510.1016/j.cma.2010.03.031 ↗
25. Riker C, Holzer SM (2009) The mixed-cell-complex partition-of-unity method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 198:1235–124810.1016/j.cma.2008.04.026 ↗
26. Rybicki EF, Kanninen MF (1977) A finite element calculation of stress intensity factors by a modified crack closure integral. Eng Fract Mech 9:931–93810.1016/0013-7944(77)90013-3 ↗
27. Sukumar N (2004) Construction of polygonal interpolants: a maximum entropy approach. Int J Numer Math Eng 61:2159–218110.1002/nme.1193 ↗
28. Sukumar N, Moranx B, Semenov Y, Belikovk VV (2001) Natural neighbour Galerkin methods. Int J Numer Methods Eng 50:1–2710.1002/1097-0207(20010110)50:1<1::AID-NME14>3.0.CO;2-P ↗
29. Srawley JE (1976) Wide range stress intensity factor expressions for ASTM E399 standard fracture toughness specimens. Int J Fract 12:475–47610.1007/BF00032844 ↗
30. Timoshenko SP, Goodier JN (1970) Theory of elasticity, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York
31. Valvo PS (2015) A further step towards a physically consistent virtual crack closure technique. Int J Fract 192:235–24410.1007/s10704-015-0007-4 ↗
32. Wang JG, Liu GR (2002) A point interpolation meshless method based on radial basis functions. Int J Numer Methods Eng 54:1623–164810.1002/nme.489 ↗
33. Wendland H (1999) Meshless Galerkin methods using radial basis functions. Math Comput 68:1521–153110.1090/S0025-5718-99-01102-3 ↗
34. Wu CT, Park CK, Chen JS (2011) A generalized approximation for the meshfree analysis of solids. Int J Numer Methods Eng 85:693–72210.1002/nme.2991 ↗
35. Xie D, Waas AM, Shahwan KW, Schroeder JA, Boeman RG (2004) Computation of energy release rates for kinking cracks based on virtual crack closure technique. CMES-Comp Model Eng 6:515–524
36. Yang SW, Budarapu PR, Mahapatra DR, Bordas SPA, Zi G, Rabczuk T (2015) A meshless adaptive multiscale method for fracture. Comp Mater Sci 96:382–39510.1016/j.commatsci.2014.08.054 ↗
37. Zheng H, Liu F, Du XL (2015) Complementarity problem arising from static growth of multiple cracks and MLS-based numerical manifold method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 295:150–17110.1016/j.cma.2015.07.001 ↗
38. Zheng H, Liu F, Li CG (2014) The MLS-based numerical manifold method with applications to crack analysis. Int J Fract 190:147–16610.1007/s10704-014-9980-2 ↗
39. Zhuang XY, Augarde C, Bordas S (2011) Accurate fracture modelling using meshless methods, the visibility criterion and level sets: Formulation and 2D modelling. Int J Numer Methods Eng 86:249–26810.1002/nme.3063 ↗