journal article·2014-08

Fracture toughness in the circumferential–longitudinal and circumferential–radial directions of longitudinal weld API 5L X52 pipeline using standard C(T) and nonstandard curved SE(B) specimens

D. Angeles-Herrera, A. Albiter-Hernández, R. Cuamatzi-Meléndez, J. L. González-Velázquez

International Journal of Fracture· Volume 188· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

In this work the fracture toughness of a longitudinal submerged arc-welding (SAW) seam weld API 5L X52 pipeline of 36 in. diameter and 1 in. thickness, was evaluated and compared in the circumferential–longitudinal (CL) and circumferential-radial (CR) directions. These tests were evaluated by means of compact tension C(T) specimens and nonstandard curved SE(B) specimens, respectively. The K function of the nonstandard curved SE(B) specimens was experimentally calibrated using the compliance experimental technique. The crack initiating notch was aligned in the longitudinal weld direction so the crack propagated through the deposited metal zone for both specimens. The laboratory tests were performed at room temperature. The K $$IC$$ average value in the CL direction was $$75.4 \pm 3.22\,\hbox {MPa}\sqrt{\hbox {m}}$$ , and for the CR direction was $$56.3 \pm 2.9\,\hbox {MPa}\sqrt{\hbox {m}}$$ . The results showed a large difference of K $$IC$$ values for each direction analyzed, which was attributed to the anisotropic properties of the weld metal, particularly in the CR direction, where the predominance of acicular ferrite grains (fragile zones) and the porosity provided a favorable crack propagation direction for separation of the fracture plane, resulting in low fracture toughness values in this direction. Finally the fractographic analysis showed that the deposited metal zone consisted of a mixture of acicular ferrite and ferrite grains, presenting a ductile behavior with dimple coalescence in the CL direction and a fragile behavior exhibiting cleavage regions that corresponded to acicular ferrite grains in the CR direction.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Engineering and Material Science Research · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals · Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (17)

Show source-provided references
1. Anderson TL (2006) Fracture mechanics fundamentals and applications, 3rd edn, Taylor and Francis, EUA, pp 61–72
2. Angeles HD, González JL, de Morales RAJ (2010). Fatigue crack propagation in SAW seam welds of API 5L X42 steel pipe in the radial short direction, Journal of ASTM International. 7:355–370.
3. Angeles HD, González JL, de Morales RAJ (2010) Compliance experimental determination in nonstandard SEN samples in API 5L Steel pipe in the short radial direction. J Mater Sci Eng 4:27–32
4. API Specification 5L. (2000) American Petroleum Institute Publishing Services, Washington, DC
5. ASTM E 647 (2005) Standard Test Method for Measurement of Fatigue Crack Growth Rates. Annual Book of ASTM Standards. 03.01, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA
6. ASTM E 8M–04 (2001) Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials. Annual Book of ASTM Standards. 03.01, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA
7. ASTM E399 (2005) Standard Test Method for Linear-Elastic Plane-Strain Fracture Toughness K $$\rm IC$$ IC of Metallic Materials, Annual Book of ASTM Standards. 03.01, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA
8. Avner SH (1994) Introducción a la metalurgia física, 2nd edn. Mc Graw-Hill, pp 187–189
9. Broek D (1986) Elementary engineering fracture mechanics, 4th edn. Martinus Nijhoff, The Netherlands, pp 8–1910.1007/978-94-009-4333-9 ↗
10. Cesar RF, Azevedo (2007) Failure analysis of a crude pipeline. Eng Fail Anal 14:978–99410.1016/j.engfailanal.2006.12.001 ↗
11. Díaz M, Gutiérrez I (2004) Relación entre el comportamiento a fractura y la unidad microestructural en microestructuras bainítico/aciculares. XXI Congreso del Grupo Español de Fractura. 21:228–233
12. González JL (2004) Mecánica de fractura, 2nd edn. Noriega-Limusa, pp 145–150
13. Matusevich AE, Mancini RA, Giudici AJ (2012) Determinación de la tenacidad a la fractura del material de un gasoducto. Rev LatinAm Metal Mater 32:253–260
14. Terán GJ, González JL, Hallen JM (2007) Efecto del tamaño de probeta y orientación en la resistencia a la tracción y a la tenacidad a la fractura $$,$$ , . Rev Metal 43:337–35110.3989/revmetalm.2007.v43.i5.78 ↗
15. The Procedure Handbook of Arc Welding (1973). 12th Ed. The Lincoln Electric Company, Cleveland, pp 4.1-1–4.1-8
16. Timofeev BT, Blumin AA, Anikovsky V (1998) Fracture toughness of low carbon steels and their weldments. Intl J Press Vessels Pip 75:945–95010.1016/S0308-0161(98)00069-6 ↗
17. Zhang JX, Shi YW (1997) The effect of welding mechanical heterogeneity on fracture toughness feature of base metal. Intl J Press Vessels Pip 72:199–20210.1016/S0308-0161(97)00046-X ↗