journal article·2011-06

Pre-cracking behaviour in the single cantilever beam adhesion test

S. Chauffaille, J. Jumel, M. E. R. Shanahan

International Journal of Fracture· Volume 169· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

The single cantilever beam adhesion test is a variant of the asymmetric wedge test in which a constant load is attached to the free adherend end to originate the moment required for joint fracture. It has the potential disadvantage of leading to an uncontrollable, accelerating crack, due to the constantly increasing applied couple, but presents the advantage of providing data on joint behaviour prior to crack initiation. It is this latter aspect that we consider in this paper. An apparently decreasing crack growth rate, as obtained from measurements of displacement of the free end of the beam is attributed to time-dependent adhesive strain. Use of classic, simple beam theory and Winkler, elastic foundation, equations allows us to assess an effectively static fracture energy, or fracture threshold.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Numerical methods in engineering

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (54)

Show source-provided references
1. Anderson TL (2005) Fracture mechanics—fundamentals and applications, 3rd edn. CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton10.1201/9781420058215 ↗
2. Barenblatt GI (1962) The mathematical theory of equilibrium cracks in brittle fracture. In: Dryden HL, Kármán T, Kuerti G, Dungen FH, Howarth L (eds) Advances in applied mechanics, vol 7. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 55–129. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2156(08)70121-210.1016/S0065-2156(08)70121-2 ↗
3. Biel A, Stigh U (2008) Effects of constitutive parameters on the accuracy of measured fracture energy using the DCB-specimen. Eng Fract Mech 75: 2968–2983. doi: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2008.01.00210.1016/j.engfracmech.2008.01.002 ↗
4. Blackman B, Dear JP, Kinloch AJ, Osiyemi S (1991) The calculation of adhesive fracture energies from double-cantilever beam test specimens. J Mat Sci Lett 10: 253–256. doi: 10.1007/BF0073564910.1007/BF00735649 ↗
5. Blackman BRK, Hadavinia H, Kinloch AJ, Paraschi M, Williams JG (2003) The calculation of adhesive fracture energies in mode I: revisiting the tapered double cantilever beam (TDCB) test. Eng Fract Mech 70: 233–248. doi: 10.1016/S0013-7944(02)00031-010.1016/S0013-7944(02)00031-0 ↗
6. Blackman BRK, Johnsen BB, Kinloch AJ, Teo WS (2008) The effects of pre-bond moisture on the fracture behaviour of adhesively-bonded composite joints. J Adhes 84(3): 256–276. doi: 10.1080/0021846080195439110.1080/00218460801954391 ↗
7. Bradley W, Cantwell WJ, Kausch HH (1998) Viscoelastic creep crack growth: a review of fracture mechanical analyses. Mech Time Depend Mater 1: 241–268. doi: 10.1023/A:100976651642910.1023/A:1009766516429 ↗
8. Budzik M, Jumel J, Imielińska K, Shanahan MER (2009) Fracture in composite/aluminium joints of variable adhesive properties. J Adhes 85(10): 736–754. doi: 10.1080/0021846090299723210.1080/00218460902997232 ↗
9. Budzik M, Jumel J, Imielińska K, Shanahan MER (2011) Effect of adhesive compliance in the assessment of soft adhesives with the wedge test. J Adhes Sci Tech 25: 131–149. doi: 10.1163/016942410X50113310.1163/016942410X501133 ↗
10. Chen B, Dillard DA, Dillard JG, Clark RL (2001) Crack path selection in adhesively-bonded joints: the role of material properties. J Adhes 75: 405–434. doi: 10.1080/0021846010802961310.1080/00218460108029613 ↗
11. Chudnovsky A, Moet A (1986) A theory for crack layer propagation in polymers. J Elastomers Plast 18(1): 50–55. doi: 10.1177/00952443860180010710.1177/009524438601800107 ↗
12. Cognard J (1986) The mechanics of the wedge test. J Adhes 20(1): 1–13. doi: 10.1080/0021846860807323610.1080/00218468608073236 ↗
13. Cognard J (2000) Science et technologies du collage. Lausanne: Presses Polytechniques et Universitaires Romandes
14. Cotterell B, Hbaieb K, Williams JG, Hadavinia H, Tropsa V (2006) The root rotation in double cantilever beam and peel tests. Mech Mater 38: 571–584. doi: 10.1016/j.mechmat.2005.11.00110.1016/j.mechmat.2005.11.001 ↗
15. Digby RP, Packham DE (1995) Pretreatment of aluminium: topography, surface chemistry and adhesive bond durability. Int J Adhes Adhes 15: 61–73. doi: 10.1016/0143-7496(95)98739-910.1016/0143-7496(95)98739-9 ↗
16. Dugdale DS (1960) Yielding of steel sheets containing slits. J Mech Phys Solids 8: 100–104. doi: 10.1016/0022-5096(60)90013-210.1016/0022-5096(60)90013-2 ↗
17. El-Senussi AK, Webber JPH (1984) On the double cantilever beam technique for studying crack propagation. J Appl Phys 56: 885–889. doi: 10.1063/1.33406310.1063/1.334063 ↗
18. Flavio VS, David HA (2010) Modeling failure of heterogeneous viscoelastic solids under dynamic/impact loading due to multiple evolving cracks using a two-way coupled multiscale model. Mech Time Depend Mater 14: 125–151. doi: 10.1007/s11043-009-9099-410.1007/s11043-009-9099-4 ↗
19. Ghatak A, Mahadevan L, Chung JY, MK. Chaudhury, Shenoy V (2004) Peeling from a biomimetically patterned thin elastic film. Proc R Soc Lond A 460(2049):2725–2735. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4143178
20. Gillis PP, Gilman JJ (1964) Double-cantilever cleavage mode of crack propagation. J Appl Phys 35: 647–658. doi: 10.1063/1.171343010.1063/1.1713430 ↗
21. Griffith AA (1921) The phenomena of rupture and flow in solids. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser A 221: 163–19810.1098/rsta.1921.0006 ↗
22. Hoff NJ (1954) Approximate analysis of structures in the presence of moderately large creep deformations. Quart J Appl Math 12: 49–5510.1090/qam/61004 ↗
23. Jethwa JK, Kinloch AJ (1997) The fatigue and durability behaviour of automotive adhesives. Part I: fracture mechanics tests. J Adhes 61: 71–95. doi: 10.1080/0021846970801051710.1080/00218469708010517 ↗
24. Jones R, Xenophontos J (1976) On the Vlasov and Kerr foundation models. Acta Mech 25(1–2): 45–49. doi: 10.1007/BF0117692810.1007/BF01176928 ↗
25. Kanninen MF (1973) An augmented double cantilever beam model for studying crack propagation and arrest. Int J Fract 9: 1573–2673. doi: 10.1007/BF0003595810.1007/BF00035958 ↗
26. Kanninen MF (1974) A dynamic analysis of unstable crack propagation and arrest in the DCB test specimen. Int J Fract 10: 415–430. doi: 10.1007/BF0003550210.1007/BF00035502 ↗
27. Kendall K (1973) The shapes of peeling solid films. J Adhes 5(2): 105–117. doi: 10.1080/0021846730807501510.1080/00218467308075015 ↗
28. Kendall K (2001) Molecular adhesion and its applications. Kluwer/Plenum, New York
29. Knauss WG (1972) On the steady propagation of a crack in viscoelastic sheet: experiments and analysis. In: Kausch HH, Hassel JA, Jaffee RI (eds) Deformation and fracture of high polymers. Plenum, New York, pp 501–540
30. Mai YW (1976) Contoured double cantilever beam specimens for fracture toughness measurement of adhesive joints. J Mater Sci 11: 570–573. doi: 10.1007/BF0054093910.1007/BF00540939 ↗
31. Maugis D, Barquins M (1988) Stick-slip and peeling of adhesive tapes. In: Allen KW (eds) Adhesion, vol 12. Elsevier, London, pp 205–22210.1007/978-94-009-1349-3_14 ↗
32. Meiller M, Roche AA, Sautereau H (1999) Tapered double cantilever beam test used as a practical adhesion test for metal/adhesive/metal systems. J Adhes Sci Tech 13: 773–788. doi: 10.1163/156856199X0100910.1163/156856199X01009 ↗
33. Melerski ES (2000) Design analysis of beams, circular plates and cylindrical tanks on elastic foundations. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 284. ISBN 90-5809-303-4
34. Mostovoy S, Ripling EJ (1966) Fracture toughness of an epoxy system. J Appl Polym Sci 10: 1351–1371. doi: 10.1002/app.1966.07010091310.1002/app.1966.070100913 ↗
35. Mostovoy S, Ripling EJ (1969) Influence of water on stress corrosion cracking of epoxy bonds. J Appl Polym Sci 13: 1083–1111. doi: 10.1002/app.1969.07013060210.1002/app.1969.070130602 ↗
36. Popineau S, Gautier B, Slangen P, Shanahan MER (2004) A 3D effect in the wedge adhesion test: application of speckle interferometry. J Adhes 80: 1173–1194. doi: 10.1080/0021846049088434910.1080/00218460490884349 ↗
37. Prolongo SG, Ureña A (2009) Effect of surface pre-treatment on the adhesive strength of epoxy–aluminium joints. Int J Adhes Adhes 29: 23–31. doi: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2008.01.00110.1016/j.ijadhadh.2008.01.001 ↗
38. Saxena A (1986) Creep crack growth under non-steady state conditions. ASTM STP 905, American Society for testing and materials, Philadelphia, vol 905, pp 185–201. doi: 10.1520/STP17396S10.1520/STP17396S ↗
39. Saxena A (1998) Nonlinear fracture mechanics for engineers. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton
40. Sargent JP (2005) Durability studies for aerospace applications using peel and wedge tests. Int J Adhes Adhes 25: 247–256. doi: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2004.07.00510.1016/j.ijadhadh.2004.07.005 ↗
41. Schapery RA (1965) A method of viscoelastic stress analysis using elastic solutions. J Frankl Inst 279: 268–289. doi: 10.1016/0016-0032(65)90339-X10.1016/0016-0032(65)90339-X ↗
42. Schapery RA (1975a) A theory of crack initiation and growth in viscoelastic media—I. Theoretical development. Int J Fract 11(1): 141–159. doi: 10.1007/BF0003472110.1007/BF00034721 ↗
43. Schapery RA (1975b) A theory of crack initiation and growth in viscoelastic media—II. Approximate methods of analysis. Int J Fract 11(3): 369–388. doi: 10.1007/BF0003352610.1007/BF00033526 ↗
44. Schapery RA (1975c) A theory of crack initiation and growth in viscoelastic media—III. Analysis of continuous growth. Int J Fract 11(4): 549–562. doi: 10.1007/BF0011636310.1007/BF00116363 ↗
45. Sener JY, Ferracin T, Caussin L, Delannay F (2002) On the precision of the wedge-opened double cantilever beam method for measuring the debonding toughness of adhesively bonded plates. Int J Adhes Adhes 22: 129–137. doi: 10.1016/S0143-7496(01)00046-X10.1016/S0143-7496(01)00046-X ↗
46. Terzaghi K (1955) Evaluation of coefficients of subgrade reaction. Géotechnique 5(4):297–326. http://worldcat.org/issn/00168505
47. Timoshenko SP, Goodier JN (1951) Theory of elasticity, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill Book Co, New York
48. Troczynski T, Camire J (1995) On use of double cantilever beam for coatings and adhesion tests. Eng Fract Mech 51: 327–332. doi: 10.1016/0013-7944(94)00262-G10.1016/0013-7944(94)00262-G ↗
49. Wiederhorn SM, Shorb AM, Moses RL (1968) Critical analysis of the theory of the double cantilever method of measuring fracture-surface energies. J Appl Phys 39: 1569–1572. doi: 10.1063/1.165639710.1063/1.1656397 ↗
50. Williams JG (1989) End corrections for orthotropic DCB specimens. Comput Sci Tech 35: 367–376. doi: 10.1016/0266-3538(89)90058-410.1016/0266-3538(89)90058-4 ↗
51. Williams JG (1993) Root rotation and plastic work effects in the peel test. J Adhes 41: 225239. doi: 10.1080/0021846930802656410.1080/00218469308026564 ↗
52. Winkler E (1867) Die Lehre von der Elasticität und Festigkeit. Verlag von Dominicus H, Prague
53. Xu S, Guo S, Dillard DA (2004) Evaluation of the long-term durability of high-performance polyimide adhesives for bonding titanium. J Adhes 80: 1153–1172. doi: 10.1080/0021846049088433010.1080/00218460490884330 ↗
54. Yamada SE (1987) Elastic/plastic fracture analysis for bonded joints. Eng Fract Mech 27: 315–328. doi: 10.1016/0013-7944(87)90149-410.1016/0013-7944(87)90149-4 ↗