Scaling global fracture behavior of structures-sized laminated composites
Source abstract
Abstract
The propagation of damage in laminated fiber composites similar to a crack-like configuration is studied experimentally. Of particular interest is the behavior of a `macro-crack' or `global crack' that propagates through a large scale structure (e.g., airplane fuselage or wing) with the potential interaction of stringers or other reinforcements. The question is considered whether such damage propagation can be understood in terms of classical fracture mechanics. Because the damage zone (wake width) can be very extensive and may be measured in terms of inches, the question arises as to the scalability of associated `fracture' phenomena. An integral part of this investigation is thus an examination of the size of the test specimens to establish whether a minimum size is required to relate fracture at larger scales by laboratory specimens. Using (globally anisotropic) 32-lamina composite specimens, proportioned like compact tension specimens, it is found that test `coupons' on the order of 45 to 50 cm on a side (18×18 in.2) or larger are needed to begin simulating large scale structures for establishing a global equivalent of a fracture energy for `crack propagation' simulations. Displacement controlled tests on groups of three specimen sizes (15, 30 and 46 cm on a side) indicate that scaling can be accomplished through the square root of the linear specimen or crack dimension. In certain lay-ups `run-away delamination' severs the surface laminae so that the reinforcement action of stringers is jeopardized. Damage at the `global crack front' is quantified through an effective area relation, with a characteristic value for the mostly intra-laminar initiation of damage (intra-lamina cracks) at a sharp notch, and another value conceived of as governing the onset of unstable growth.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Optical measurement and interference techniques · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. Bader, M.G. and Priest, A.M. (1982). In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Composite Materials, Tokyo ISBS Inc., Beaverton, OR, pp. 1129–1136.
2. Bullock, R.E. (1974). Strength Ratios of Composite-Materials in Flexure and in Tension, Journal of Composite Materials, 8, pp. 200–206.10.1177/002199837400800209 ↗
3. Camponeschi, E.T., Gillespie, J.W. and Wilkins, D.J. (1993). Journal of Composite Materials 27, 471–490.10.1177/002199839302700502 ↗
4. Chang, F.H., Couchman, J.C., Eisenmann, J.R. and Yee, B.G.W. (1975). Application of a Special X-Ray Nondestructive Testing Technique for Monitoring Damage Zone Growth in Composite Laminates, Composite Reliability, ASTM STP 580, American Society for Testing and Materials, pp. 176–190.10.1520/STP32307S ↗
5. Choi, S. and Shah, S.P. (1997). Measurement of deformation on concrete subjected to compression using image correlation. Experimental Mechanics 37(3), 307–313.10.1007/BF02317423 ↗
6. Chu, T.C., Ranson, W.F., Sutton, M.A., and Peters, W.H. (1985). Applications of digital image correlation techniques to experimental mechanics. Experimental Mechanics 25(3), 232–244.10.1007/BF02325092 ↗
7. Clarke, A., Wisnom, M.R. and Potter, K. (1997). Proceedings of Deformation and Fracture of Composites, Manchester, pp. 29–37.
8. Cohen, D. (1992). Application of Reliability and Fiber Probabilistic Strength Distribution Concepts to Composite Vessel Burst Strength Design, Journal of Composites Materials 26, 1984–2014.10.1177/002199839202601307 ↗
9. Crane, R. et al. (2000). Radiographic inspection of composites. Comprehensive Composite Materials 6, 321–344.10.1016/B0-08-042993-9/00078-4 ↗
10. Cunningham, M.E., Schoulz, S.V. and Toth, J.M. Jr. (1985). Effect of End-Tab Design on Tension Specimen Stress Concentrations, in Recent Advances in the United States and Japan. ASTMSTP 864, J.R. Vinson and M. Taya, eds. Philadelphia, PA: American Society for Testing Materials, pp. 253–262.
11. Daniel, I.M. and Hsiao, H.M. (1999). Is there a thickness effect on compressive strength of unnotched composite laminates?, International Journal of Fracture 95(1–4), 143–158.10.1023/A:1018692032303 ↗
12. Franke, E.A., Wenzel, D.J. and Davison, D.L. (1991). Measurement of microdisplacements by machine vision photogrammetry (DISMAP). Review of Scientific Instruments 62 (5), 1270–1279.10.1063/1.1142484 ↗
13. González, L. (2002). ‘Global Fracture Analysis of Laminated Composite Materials for Aerospace Structures’, Ph.D. Thesis; Calif. Inst. Techn. Pasadena, CA, 91125, pp. 46–50.
14. Gurvich, M.R. and Pipes, R.B. (1995). Strength Size Effect of Laminated Composites, Composites Science and Technology 55, 93–105.10.1016/0266-3538(95)00092-5 ↗
15. Hitchon, M.R. and Phillips, D.C. (1978). ‘Effect of Specimen Size on Strength of Cfrp’, Composites 9, 119–124.10.1016/0010-4361(78)90590-6 ↗
16. Hojo, M., Sawada, Y. and Miyairi, H. (1994). Influence of Clamping Method on Tensile Properties of Unidirectional Cfrp in 0-Degrees and 90-Degrees Directions – Round-Robin Activity for International Standardization in Japan, Composites 25, 786–796.10.1016/0010-4361(94)90139-2 ↗
17. Jackson, D.P. and Kellas, S. (1993). in US Army Symposium on Solid Mechanics, Plymouth, MA.
18. Johnson, D.P., Morton, J., Kellas, S. and Jackson, K. (1997). Scaling effects in sublaminate-level scaled composite laminates, AIAA Journal 36, 441–447.10.2514/2.384 ↗
19. Kies, J.A. (1967). NRL Report No. 60.4, US Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, D.C.
20. Li, L., Li, X. and Tong, W. (1998). Moiré interferometry and digital correlation: a comparative study. Proceedings of 1998 SEM Spring Conference (June 1–3, 1998, Houston, Texas, USA).
21. Mallick, P.K. (1997). Composites Engineering Handbook Marcel Dekker Inc., New York.10.1201/9781482277739 ↗
22. O'Brien, T.K. and Salpekar, S.A. (1993). Composite Materials: Testing and Design, Vol. 1206 (Edited by Camponeschi, E.) ASTM, pp. 23–52.
23. Reeder, J.R. (1995). Stitching vs a toughened matrix: Compression strength effects, Journal of Composite Materials 29, 2464–2487.10.1177/002199839502901805 ↗
24. Shivakumar, K.N., Allen, H.G. and Avva, V.S. (1994). Interlaminar Tension Strength of Graphite-Epoxy Composite Laminates, AIAA Journal 32, 1478–1484.10.2514/3.12218 ↗
25. Smith, X., Li and Tong W. (1998). Error assessment for strain mapping by digital image correlation, Experimental Techniques, 22, pp. 19–21.10.1111/j.1747-1567.1998.tb02332.x ↗
26. Sutton, M.A. et al. (1983). Determination of displacements using an improved digital correlation method. Image and Vision Computing 1(3), 133–139.10.1016/0262-8856(83)90064-1 ↗
27. Tada, H. et al. (2000). The Stress Analysis of Cracks Handbook, 3rd ed., ASME Press, p. 63.10.1115/1.801535 ↗
28. Tan, S.C. and Cheng, S. (1993). Failure criteria for fibrous anisotropic materials. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering 5(2), 198–211.10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(1993)5:2(198) ↗
29. Tong, W. et al. (1998). Error assessment for strain mapping by digital image correlation. Experimental Techniques 22(4), 19–21.10.1111/j.1747-1567.1998.tb02332.x ↗
30. Tsai, S.W. (1968). Strength theories of filamentary structures. In Fundamental Aspects of Fiber Reinforced Plastic Composites (Edited by R.T. Schwartz and H.S. Schwartz), Wiley Interscience, New York, NY, pp. 3–11.
31. Tsai, S.W. and Hahn, H.T. (1980). Introduction to Composite Materials, Technomic Publishing Co., Inc., Lancaster, PA.
32. Tsai, S.W. and Wu, E.M. (1971). A general theory of strength for anisotropic materials. Journal Composite Materials 5, 58–80.10.1177/002199837100500106 ↗
33. Ungsuwarungsri, T. and Knauss, W.G. (1988). A nonlinear analysis of an equilibrium craze: Part II. Simulations of craze and crack growth. JAM 110, 52–58.
34. Vendroux, G. and Knauss, W.G. (1994). Deformation Measurements at the Sub-micron Size Scale: II: Refinements in the Algorithm for Digital Image Correlation, GALCIT Report 94-5, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena.
35. Vendroux, G. and Knauss, W.G. (1998). Submicron deformation field measurements: Part 2. Improved digital image correlation. Experimental Mechanics 38(2), 85–92.10.1007/BF02321649 ↗
36. Wisnom, M.R. and Atkinson, J.A. (1997). Reduction in tensile and flexural strength of unidirectional glass fibreepoxy with increasing specimen size, Composite Structures 38, 405–411.10.1016/S0263-8223(97)00075-5 ↗
37. Wisnom, M.R. and Maheri, M.R. (1994). Tensile strength of unidirectional carbon fibre-epoly from tapered specimens. Proc. of the 2nd European Conf. on Composite Materials – Composites Testing and Standardization, Hamburg, Germany, Woodhead Publ. pp. 239–247.
38. Wu, E.M. (1968). Fracture Mechanics of Anisotropic Plates, Composite Materials Workshop. Lancaster, PA: Technomic Publishing Co., Inc.
39. Wu, E.M. (1974). Phenomenological anisotropic failure criterion. In Composite Materials, 2, Mechanics of Composite Materials, Academic Press, Orlando, FL, pp. 353–431.