journal article·2005-09

Analysis of Essential Work of Rupture using Non-local Damage-plasticity Modelling

Alexander M. Korsunsky, Giang D. Nguyen, Guy T. Houlsby

International Journal of Fracture· Volume 135· Issue 1-4
Publisher page

Abstract

We consider the non-local damage plasticity modelling of the essential work of rupture (EWR), i.e. the specific energy required to cause failure within a specimen, resulting in its separation into two parts. The more usual concept of essential work of fracture (EWF) is a measure of the specific energy, per unit cross sectional area, consumed during the propagation of cracks across a series of double edge-notched tensile (DENT) specimens. Recently, a novel framework has been proposed allowing the determination of a related quantity, the essential work of necking and tearing from a single tensile test on an unnotched dogbone specimen of ductile metal. Simultaneous multiple gauge length extensometry forms a crucial component of the experimental approach, and allows capture of such phenomena as strain localisation, post-critical deformation behaviour, damage non-locality, elastic snap-back, and size effects. In this study the rupture test is simulated using a non-local damage-plasticity model using finite elements. The results are interpreted in terms of essential and non-essential work of rupture.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Metallurgy and Material Forming

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (12)

Show source-provided references
1. Bažant Z.P. (2002) The Scaling of Structural Strength, Hermes Penton Science, 228 pp.
2. Carpinteri, A., and Chiaia, B. (1995), in Fracture Mechanics of Concrete Structures (Proceedings of FraMCoS2), ed. Wittmann F.H., Aedificatio Publishers, Freiburg, 581-596.
3. B. Cotterell · Int.J. Frac. · 1977 · 13 · 26710.1007/BF00040143 ↗
4. S. Hashemi · Polymer Testing · 2003 · 22 · 58910.1016/S0142-9418(02)00162-9 ↗
5. G.T. Houlsby · Int. J. Plasticity · 2000 · 16 · 101710.1016/S0749-6419(99)00073-X ↗
6. B.L. Karihaloo · 1995
7. J. Karger-Kocsis · Polymer · 1996 · 37 · 243310.1016/0032-3861(96)85355-9 ↗
8. Korsunsky, A.M., Kim, K, Chiu, C. (2004) A new method for the determination of essential work of necking and tearing. Intl. Conf. on Exp. Mechanics (ICEM 2004), Singapore, Dec 2004.
9. A.M. Korsunsky · Intl. J. Fracture · 2005 · 132 · 3710.1007/s10704-005-4483-9 ↗
10. Nguyen, G.D. (2005) A thermodynamic approach to constitutive modelling of concrete using damage mechanics and plasticity theory, D.Phil. Thesis, Department of Engineering Science, Oxford University.
11. C. Polizzotto · Eur. J. Mech. A/Solids · 1998 · 17 · 74110.1016/S0997-7538(98)80003-X ↗
12. C. Polizzotto · Mechanics Research Communications · 1998 · 25 · 7510.1016/S0093-6413(98)00009-3 ↗