journal article·2005-03

Assessment of an instrumented Charpy impact machine

Anton Shterenlikht, Sayyed H. Hashemi, John R. Yates, Ian C. Howard, Robert M. Andrews

International Journal of Fracture· Volume 132· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

The dynamic responses of the standard Charpy impact machine were studied experimentally using strain gauges and accelerometer attached to the striker and the rotary position sensor fixed at the rotating axis and numerically with the finite element analysis. The fracture propagation was simulated with the cellular automata finite element approach developed earlier. A series of low velocity as well as full capacity Charpy tests were analysed. It was found that the strain gauge signal recorded close to the tup edge and the acceleration recorded at the back of the striker do not match. The energy calculated with the strain gauge data agrees well with the dial reading, while the energy calculated with the accelerometer signal is never near it. Frequencies close to the first natural hbox{frequency} of the Charpy sample have high modal magnitudes in the acceleration signal but are effectively damped in the strain gauge response. Vibrations of the striker arm have highest modal magnitudes in the rotary position sensor. A low-pass filter is used to obtain the striker movements. The finite element analysis partly supports the experimental observations but also suggests that acceleration at the tup edge suffers higher oscillations than strain.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Geophysical Methods and Applications · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (18)

Show source-provided references
1. Andrews, R.M., Howard, I.C., Shterenlikht A., and Yates, J.R. (2002). The Effective Resistance of Pipeline Steels to Running Ductile Fractures; Modelling of Laboratory Test Data. In: A. Neimitz, I.V. Rokach, D. Koca?da, and K. Go?o? (eds.): ECF14, Fracture Mechanics Beyond 2000. Sheffield, UK, pp. 65?72, EMAS Publications.
2. E 23 ASTM · 1998
3. S. Bellizzi · Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics · 1999 · 14 · 24510.1016/S0266-8920(98)00010-1 ↗
4. ISO 14556 (2000). International Standard. Steel ? Charpy V-notch pendulum impact test ? Instrumented test method. International Organization for Standardization.
5. T. Kobayashi · Engineering Fracture Mechanics · 1984 · 19 · 4910.1016/0013-7944(84)90068-7 ↗
6. T. Kobayashi · Journal of Testing and Evaluation · 1993 · 21 · 14510.1520/JTE11763J ↗
7. P.R. Marur · Engineering Fracture Mechanics · 1998 · 61 · 36910.1016/S0013-7944(98)00064-2 ↗
8. P.R. Marur · Engineering Fracture Mechanics · 2000 · 67 · 4110.1016/S0013-7944(00)00035-7 ↗
9. P.R. Marur · Engineering Fracture Mechanics · 1996 · 53 · 48110.1016/0013-7944(95)00099-2 ↗
10. P.R. Marur · International Journal of Fracture · 1994 · 68 · 26110.1007/BF00013071 ↗
11. P.R. Marur · Journal of Testing and Evaluation · 1995 · 23 · 26710.1520/JTE10424J ↗
12. G.E. Nash · Engineering Fracture Mechanics · 1971 · 3 · 13910.1016/0013-7944(71)90005-1 ↗
13. Rousselier, G., Devaux, J.-C., Mottel, G. and Devesa, G. (1989). A methodology of ductile fracture analysis based on damage mechanics: an illustration of a local approach of fracture. In: Non-linear fracture mechanics: Volume II - Elastic-Plastic Fracture, ASTM STP 995. (J.D. Landes, Saxena, A. and Merkle J.G.) edited by Philadelphia, 332?354.
14. S. Sahraoui · Engineering Fracture Mechanics · 1998 · 60 · 43710.1016/S0013-7944(98)00024-1 ↗
15. 2003
16. A. Shterenlikht · 2004 · 11
17. Timoshenko, S., Young, D.H. and Weaver, W. Jr. (1974). Vibrational Problems in Engineering. Wiley, 4th edition.
18. J.G. Williams · International Journal of Fracture · 1987 · 33 · 4710.1007/BF00034898 ↗