Validation and Improvements of a Generalized/eXtended Finite Element Method for 3-D Fatigue Crack Propagation
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The main objectives of this paper are to simulate 3-D fatigue crack propagation using a Generalized Finite Element Method (GFEM) and to validate the results against experimental data. This GFEM adopts a high-order p-hierarchical basis and explicit representations of crack surfaces. Both h-refinement around the fracture fronts and non-uniform p-enrichment of the analysis domain are used to control discretization errors. A systematic validation of this GFEM applied to 3-D fatigue crack propagation has not been reported in the literature. The Displacement Correlation Method (DCM) is used to extract stress intensity factors. The effect of material parameters adopted in the DCM on the crack growth rate and fracture shape is investigated. Three increasingly complex fatigue crack propagation problems are solved. The first involves mixed-mode loading in a modified compact tension specimen. The second one involves the transition from 2-D to 1-D crack surfaces and interactions between the crack front and the corners of the domain boundary. The final problem simulates the growth of a circumferential surface crack in a steel pipe subjected to fatigue bending with overloading, where interactions between the crack and the pipe’s inner surface result in the splitting of the crack front. Another contribution is an algorithm designed to manage cyclic load histories featuring variable loading ranges and ratios between minimum and maximum load magnitudes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Numerical methods in engineering · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (81)
Show source-provided references
1. Abaqus (2014) Version 6.14 Documentation. Dassault Systemes Simulia Corporation, Providence, RI, USA
2. AFGROW (2024) Fatigue Crack Growth Analysis Software, Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL). https://www.afgrow.net/
3. Alshoaibi A, Fageehi Y (2024) A comparative analysis of 3d software for modeling fatigue crack growth: a review. Appl Sci 14(5):1848. https://doi.org/10.3390/app1405184810.3390/app14051848 ↗
4. Anderson T (2005) Fracture Mechanics: Fundamentals and Applications, 3rd edn. Taylor and Francis, Boca Raton, Florida10.1201/9781420058215 ↗
5. Ansys Mechanical, Ansys, Inc. (2013). https://www.ansys.com/products/structures/ansys-mechanical
6. Aragón, A, Duarte C (2024) Fundamentals of Enriched Finite Element Methods, 1 edn. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2019-0-05419-2. https://shop.elsevier.com/books/fundamentals-of-enriched-finite-element-methods/aragon/978-0-323-85515-010.1016/C2019-0-05419-2 ↗
7. Babuška I, Banerjee U (2012) Stable generalized finite element method (sgfem). Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 201–204:91–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2011.09.01210.1016/j.cma.2011.09.012 ↗
8. Babuška I, Caloz G, Osborn J (1994) Special finite element methods for a class of second order elliptic problems with rough coefficients. SIAM J Numer Anal 31(4):945–98110.1137/0731051 ↗
9. Babuška I, Melenk J (1997) The partition of unity method. Int J Numer Meth Eng 40:727–75810.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19970228)40:4<727::AID-NME86>3.0.CO;2-N ↗
10. Banks-Sills L, Hershkovitz I, Wawrzynek P, Eliasi R, Ingraffea A (2005) Methods for calculating stress intensity factors in anisotropic materials: part i - z = 0 is a symmetric plane. Eng Fract Mech 72(15):2328–2358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2004.12.00710.1016/j.engfracmech.2004.12.007 ↗
11. Banks-Sills L, Sherman D (1986) Comparison of methods for calculating stress intensity factors with quarter-point elements. Int J Fract 32:127–14010.1007/BF00019788 ↗
12. Barsoum R (1976) On the use of isoparametric finite elements in linear fracture mechanics. Int J Numer Meth Eng 10(1):25–37. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.162010010310.1002/nme.1620100103 ↗
13. Belytschko T, Black T (1999) Elastic crack growth in finite elements with minimal remeshing. Int J Numer Meth Eng 45:601–62010.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19990620)45:5<601::AID-NME598>3.0.CO;2-S ↗
14. Belytschko T, Gracie R, Ventura G (2009) A review of extended/generalized finite element methods for material modeling. Modelling and Simulations in Materials Science and Engineering 17:043001. https://doi.org/10.1088/0965-0393/17/4/04300110.1088/0965-0393/17/4/043001 ↗
15. Bergara A, Dorado J, Martin-Meizoso A, Martínez-Esnaola J (2017) Fatigue crack propagation in complex stress fields: experiments and numerical simulations using the extended finite element method (xfem). Int J Fatigue 103:112–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.05.02610.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.05.026 ↗
16. Branco R, Antunes F, Costa J (2015) A review on 3d-fe adaptive remeshing techniques for crack growth modelling. Eng Fract Mech 141:170–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2015.05.02310.1016/j.engfracmech.2015.05.023 ↗
17. Bravos CMAA (2004) Um sistema de refinamento h-p adaptativo utilizando elementos finitos hierarquicos multidimensionais. Ph.D. thesis, Faculdade de Engenharia Mecanica, Universidade Estadual de Campinas
18. The British Standards Institution: Guide to methods for assessing the acceptability of flaws in metallic structures, 4 edn. (2019). ISBN 978 0 580 52086 0
19. CalculiX (2024) User’s Manual. https://www.calculix.de/
20. Cervenka J, Saouma V (1997) Numerical evaluation of 3-d sif for arbitrary finite element meshes. Eng Fract Mech 57(5):541–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7944(97)00024-610.1016/S0013-7944(97)00024-6 ↗
21. Chan S, Tuba I, Wilson W (1970) On the finite element method in linear fracture mechanics. Eng Fract Mech 2:1–1710.1016/0013-7944(70)90026-3 ↗
22. Daimon R, Okada H (2014) Mixed-mode stress intensity factor evaluation by interaction integral method for quadratic tetrahedral finite element with correction terms. Eng Fract Mech 115:22–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2013.11.00910.1016/j.engfracmech.2013.11.009 ↗
23. Dolbow J, Moës N, Belytschko T (2000) Discontinuous enrichment in finite elements with a partition of unity method. Finite Elem Anal Des 36:235–26010.1016/S0168-874X(00)00035-4 ↗
24. Duarte C (2016) ISET-An Adaptive Generalized Finite Element Solver, Reference Manual. ISET Developers, http://gfem.cee.illinois.edu
25. Duarte C, Babuška I, Oden J (2000) Generalized finite element methods for three dimensional structural mechanics problems. Comput Struct 77:215–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(99)00211-410.1016/S0045-7949(99)00211-4 ↗
26. Duarte C, Hamzeh O, Liszka T, Tworzydlo W (2001) A generalized finite element method for the simulation of three-dimensional dynamic crack propagation. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 190(15–17):2227–2262. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7825(00)00233-410.1016/S0045-7825(00)00233-4 ↗
27. Duarte C, Kim DJ (2008) Analysis and applications of a generalized finite element method with global-local enrichment functions. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 197(6–8):487–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2007.08.01710.1016/j.cma.2007.08.017 ↗
28. Erdogan F, Sih G (1963) On the crack extension in plates under plane loading and transverse shear. J Basic Eng 85:519–52510.1115/1.3656897 ↗
29. Ferrie E, Buffiere JY, Ludwig W, Gravouil A, Edwards L (2006) Fatigue crack propagation: in situ visualization using x-ray microtomography and 3d similation using the extended finite element method. Acta Mater 54:1111–112210.1016/j.actamat.2005.10.053 ↗
30. FRANC3D (2025) Fracture Analysis Consultants, Inc. https://fracanalysis.com/index.html
31. Fries TP, Baydoun M (2012) Crack propagation with the extended finite element method and a hybrid explicit-implicit crack description. Int J Numer Meth Eng 89(12):1527–1558. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.329910.1002/nme.3299 ↗
32. Garzon J, O’Hara P, Duarte C, Buttlar W (2014) Improvements of explicit crack surface representation and update within the generalized finite element method with application to three-dimensional crack coalescence. Int J Numer Meth Eng 97(4):231–273. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.457310.1002/nme.4573 ↗
33. González-Albuixech V, Giner E, Gravouil A (2025) Analysis of stress intensity factor oscillations in 3d cracks using domain integrals and the extended finite element method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 436:117739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2025.11773910.1016/j.cma.2025.117739 ↗
34. Gonzalez-Albuixech V, Giner E, Tarancon J, Fuenmayor F, Gravouil A (2013) Domain integral formulation for 3-d curved and non-planar cracks with the extended finite element method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 264:129–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2013.05.01610.1016/j.cma.2013.05.016 ↗
35. Gupta P, Duarte C (2014) Simulation of non-planar three-dimensional hydraulic fracture propagation. Int J Numer Anal Meth Geomech 38:1397–1430. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.230510.1002/nag.2305 ↗
36. Gupta P, Duarte C, Dhankhar A (2017) Accuracy and robustness of stress intensity factor extraction methods for the generalized/extended finite element method. Eng Fract Mech 179:120–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.03.03510.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.03.035 ↗
37. Henshell R, Shaw K (1975) Crack tip finite elements are unnecessary. Int J Numer Meth Eng 9(3):495–507. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.162009030210.1002/nme.1620090302 ↗
38. Ingraffea A (2004) Computational fracture mechanics. In: E. Stein, R. de Borst, T. Hughes (eds.) Encyclopedia of Computational Mechanics, vol. 2: Solids and Structures. John Wiley & Sons10.1002/0470091355.ecm032.pub2 ↗
39. Ingraffea A, Manu C (1980) Stress-intensity factor computation in three dimensions with quarter-point elements. Int J Numer Meth Eng 15(10):1427–1445. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.162015100210.1002/nme.1620151002 ↗
40. Kamaya M (2008) Growth evaluation of multiple interacting surface cracks. Part I: Experiments and simulation of coalesced crack. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 75(6):1336–134910.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.07.015 ↗
41. Kamaya M (2008) Growth evaluation of multiple interacting surface cracks. Part II: Growth evaluation of parallel cracks. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 75(6):1350–136610.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.07.014 ↗
42. Kim DJ, Pereira J, Duarte C (2010) Analysis of three-dimensional fracture mechanics problems: a two-scale approach using coarse generalized fem meshes. Int J Numer Meth Eng 81(3):335–365. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.269010.1002/nme.2690 ↗
43. Kuna M (2013) Finite elements in fracture mechanics: theory - numerics - applications. Springer, Dordrecht10.1007/978-94-007-6680-8 ↗
44. Li Z (2025) Personal Communication
45. Li Z, Jiang X, Hopman H, Zhu L, Liu Z (2020) An investigation on the circumferential surface crack growth in steel pipes subjected to fatigue bending. Theoret Appl Fract Mech 105:102403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2019.10240310.1016/j.tafmec.2019.102403 ↗
46. Loghin A (2022) Fatigue crack growth modeling validation using piping specimen experimental data. In: AFGROW Workshop. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.22766.0800510.13140/RG.2.2.22766.08005 ↗
47. Loghin A, Harter J (2023) Validation of fatigue crack growth modeling solutions using measurements collected on API X65 piping specimens. In: ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference. Atlanta, GA. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.21078.2208610.13140/RG.2.2.21078.22086 ↗
48. Loghin A, Ismonov S (2019) Augmenting generic fatigue crack growth models using 3D finite element simulations and Gaussian process modeling. In: Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, vol. 58936, p. V002T02A004. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)10.1115/PVP2019-93153 ↗
49. Mazurowski B, Sanchez-Rivadeneira A, Shauer N, Duarte C (2021) High-order stable generalized/extended finite element approximations for accurate stress intensity factors. Eng Fract Mech 241:107308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.10730810.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.107308 ↗
50. Melenk J, Babuška I (1996) The partition of unity finite element method: basic theory and applications. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 139:289–31410.1016/S0045-7825(96)01087-0 ↗
51. Miranda A (2025) Personal Communication
52. Miranda ACO, Meggiolaro M, Castro J, Martha L, Bittencourt T (2003) Fatigue life and crack path predictions in generic 2d structural components. Eng Fract Mech 70(10):1259–127910.1016/S0013-7944(02)00099-1 ↗
53. Moës N, Dolbow J, Belytschko T (1999) A finite element method for crack growth without remeshing. Int J Numer Meth Eng 46:131–15010.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19990910)46:1<131::AID-NME726>3.0.CO;2-J ↗
54. Mukhtar F, Alves PD, Duarte C (2020) Validation of a 3-d adaptive stable generalized/extended finite element method for mixed-mode brittle fracture propagation. Int J Fract 225:129–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-020-00469-910.1007/s10704-020-00469-9 ↗
55. Mukhtar F, Shauer N, Duarte C (2022) Propagation mechanisms and parametric influence in multiple interacting hydraulic fractures: a 3-d g/xfem hydro-mechanical modeling. Int J Numer Anal Meth Geomech 46(11):2033–2059. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.337810.1002/nag.3378 ↗
56. NASGRO (2024) Fracture Mechanics and Fatigue Crack Growth Analysis Software, Southwest Research Institute. https://nasgro.swri.org/
57. Nejati M, Paluszny A, Zimmerman R (2015) On the use of quarter-point tetrahedral finite elements in linear elastic fracture mechanics. Eng Fract Mech 144:194–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2015.06.05510.1016/j.engfracmech.2015.06.055 ↗
58. Nikfam M, Zeinoddini M, Aghebati F, Arghaei A (2019) Experimental and xfem modelling of high cycle fatigue crack growth in steel welded t-joints. Int J Mech Sci 153–154:178–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.01.04010.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.01.040 ↗
59. Oden J, Duarte C (1997) Chapter: Clouds, Cracks and FEMs. In: B. Reddy (ed.) Recent Developments in Computational and Applied Mechanics, pp. 302–321. International Center for Numerical Methods in Engineering, CIMNE, Barcelona, Spain. Http://gfem.cee.illinois.edu/jmartincolor/
60. Oden J, Duarte C, Zienkiewicz O (1998) A new cloud-based hp finite element method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 153:117–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7825(97)00039-X10.1016/S0045-7825(97)00039-X ↗
61. Paluszny A, Zimmerman R (2011) Numerical simulation of multiple 3d fracture propagation using arbitrary meshes. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 200(9–12):953–966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2010.11.01310.1016/j.cma.2010.11.013 ↗
62. Paris A, Erdogan F (1963) A critical analysis of crack propagation laws. J Basic Eng 85:528–53410.1115/1.3656900 ↗
63. Pereira J, Duarte C, Guoy D, Jiao X (2009) Hp-generalized fem and crack surface representation for non-planar 3-d cracks. Int J Numer Meth Eng 77(5):601–633. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.241910.1002/nme.2419 ↗
64. Pereira J, Duarte C, Jiao X (2010) Three-dimensional crack growth with hp-generalized finite element and face offsetting methods. Comput Mech 46(3):431–453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-010-0491-310.1007/s00466-010-0491-3 ↗
65. Pereira J, Kim DJ, Duarte C (2012) A two-scale approach for the analysis of propagating three-dimensional fractures. Comput Mech 49(1):99–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-011-0631-410.1007/s00466-011-0631-4 ↗
66. Sadeghirad A, Chopp D, Ren X, Fang E, Lua J (2016) A novel hybrid approach for level set characterization and tracking of non-planar 3d cracks in the extended finite element method. Eng Fract Mech 160:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2016.03.02710.1016/j.engfracmech.2016.03.027 ↗
67. Sanchez-Rivadeneira A, Duarte C (2019) A stable generalized/extended fem with discontinuous interpolants for fracture mechanics. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 345:876–918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2018.11.01810.1016/j.cma.2018.11.018 ↗
68. Sanchez-Rivadeneira A, Shauer N, Mazurowski B, Duarte C (2020) A stable generalized/extended p-hierarchical fem for three-dimensional linear elastic fracture mechanics. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 364:112970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2020.11297010.1016/j.cma.2020.112970 ↗
69. Sedmak A (2024) Fatigue crack growth simulation by extended finite element method: a review of case studies. Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures 47(6):1819–1855. https://doi.org/10.1111/ffe.1427710.1111/ffe.14277 ↗
70. Shauer N, Duarte C (2022) A three-dimensional generalized finite element method for simultaneous propagation of multiple hydraulic fractures from a wellbore. Eng Fract Mech 265:108360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.10836010.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.108360 ↗
71. Shi J, Chopp D, Lua J, Sukumar N, Belytschko T (2010) Abaqus implementation of extended finite element method using a level set representation for three-dimensional fatigue crack growth and life predictions. Eng Fract Mech 77(14):2840–2863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.06.00910.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.06.009 ↗
72. Shi J, Chopp D, Lua J, Sukumar N, Belytschko T (2010) Abaqus implementation of extended finite element method using a level set representation for three-dimensional fatigue crack growth and life predictions. Eng Fract Mech 77(14):2840–286310.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.06.009 ↗
73. SimModeler (2025) Simmetrix, Inc. https://www.simmetrix.com/index.php
74. Stern M, Becker E, Dunham R (1976) A contour integral computation of mixed-mode stress intensity factors. Int J Fract 12:359–36810.1007/BF00032831 ↗
75. StressCheck (2024) Engineering Software Research and Development, Inc. https://www.esrd.com/stresscheck/
76. Szabo B, Babuška I (1988) Computation of the amplitude of stress singular terms for cracks and reentrant corners. In: Cruse T (ed) Fracture Mechanics: Nineteenth Symposium, ASTM STP 969. Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, TX, pp 101–12410.1520/STP33072S ↗
77. Szabo B, Babuška I (1991) Finite Element Analysis. John Wiley and Sons, New York
78. Triclot J, Corre T, Gravouil A, Lazarus V (2023) Key role of boundary conditions for the 2d modeling of crack propagation in linear elastic compact tension tests. Eng Fract Mech 277:109012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.10901210.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.109012 ↗
79. Varfolomeev I, Burdack M, Moroz S, Siegele D, Kadau K (2014) Fatigue crack growth rates and paths in two planar specimens under mixed mode loading. Int J Fatigue 58:12–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2013.04.01310.1016/j.ijfatigue.2013.04.013 ↗
80. Vida (2002) Fatigue Damage Calculator, Tecgraf. https://www.tecgraf.puc-rio.br/vida/intro.htm
81. Walters M, Paulino G, Dodds R (2005) Interaction integral procedures for 3-d curved cracks including surface tractions. Eng Fract Mech 72(11):1635–1663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2005.01.00210.1016/j.engfracmech.2005.01.002 ↗