A phase field formulation for modeling intralaminar damage onset and propagation in composites including residual stresses
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Unfolding failure is a sudden delamination occurring in highly curved fiber-reinforced polymer composite laminates when they are subjected to opening bending moments. Depending on the stacking sequences involved, unfolding failure includes intralaminar damage, interlaminar damage and their complex interactions. The use of these laminates in primary structural components of commercial aircrafts has intensified interest in understanding this failure mechanism. To tackle this, a simple phase field formulation to model the onset and propagation of transverse damage in highly curved laminates is presented. Firstly, the Abaqus implementation of the phase field to model intralaminar damage in composite laminates is established, exploiting the analogy between phase field and the heat transfer model to use Abaqus temperature as the phase field damage parameter. In addition, since residual stresses developed during manufacturing processes affect damage propagation, they are incorporated into the formulation as constant residual strains. Secondly, the proposed implementation is validated by performing tests on benchmark problems. Finally, a preliminary analysis of the unfolding failure test is provided to highlight the importance of including residual stresses in the transverse damage evolution.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Numerical methods in engineering · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Mechanical Behavior of Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. Ambrosio L, Tortorelli V (1990) Approximation of functionals depending on jumps by elliptic functional via gamma-convergence. Commun Pure Appl Math 43:999–1036. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpa.316043080510.1002/cpa.3160430805 ↗
2. Amor H, Marigo JJ, Maurini C (2009) Regularized formulation of the variational brittle fracture with unilateral contact: numerical experiments. J Mech Phys Solids 57:1209–1229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2009.04.01110.1016/j.jmps.2009.04.011 ↗
3. Bao G, Ho S, Suo Z, Fan B (1992a) The role of material orthotropy in fracture specimens for composites. Int J Solids Struct 29:1105–1116. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7683(92)90138-J10.1016/0020-7683(92)90138-J ↗
4. Bao G, Ho S, Suo Z, Fan B (1992b) Corrigenda. Int J Solids Struct 29:2115. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7683(92)90198-310.1016/0020-7683(92)90198-3 ↗
5. Bleyer J, Alessi R (2018) Phase-field modeling of anisotropic brittle fracture including several damage mechanisms. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 336:213–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2018.03.01210.1016/j.cma.2018.03.012 ↗
6. Bourdin B, Francfort GA, Marigo JJ (2000) Numerical experiments in revisited brittle fracture. J Mech Phys Solids 48:797–826. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5096(99)00028-910.1016/S0022-5096(99)00028-9 ↗
7. Bushpalli S, Zumaquero P, López-Romano B, Graciani E (2024) A simple stress-based failure criterion for predicting unfolding failure. Compos a: Appl Sci Manuf 181:108139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2024.10813910.1016/j.compositesa.2024.108139 ↗
8. Cao YJ, Shen WQ, Shao JF, Wang W (2020) A novel FFT-based phase field model for damage and cracking behavior of heterogeneous materials. Int J Plast 133:102786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2020.10278610.1016/j.ijplas.2020.102786 ↗
9. Clayton JD, Knap J (2015) Phase field modeling of directional fracture in anisotropic polycrystals. Comput Mater Sci 98:158–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2014.11.00910.1016/j.commatsci.2014.11.009 ↗
10. Francfort GA, Marigo JJ (1998) Revisiting brittle fracture as an energy minimization problem. J Mech Phys Solids 46:1319–1342. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5096(98)00034-910.1016/S0022-5096(98)00034-9 ↗
11. Francfort GA, Bourdin B, Marigo JJ (2008) The variational approach to fracture. J Elast 91:5–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10659-007-9107-310.1007/s10659-007-9107-3 ↗
12. García IG, Justo J, Simon A, Mantič V (2019) Experimental study of the size effect of transverse cracking in cross-ply laminates and comparison with the main theoretical models. Mech Mater 128:24–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2018.09.00610.1016/j.mechmat.2018.09.006 ↗
13. González-Cantero JM, Graciani E, Blázquez A, París F (2016) A new analytical model for evaluating interlaminar stresses in the unfolding failure of composite laminates. Compos Struct 147:260–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.03.02510.1016/j.compstruct.2016.03.025 ↗
14. González-Cantero JM, Graciani E, París F, López-Romano B (2017) Semi-analytic model to evaluate non-regularized stresses causing unfolding failure in composites. Compos Struct 171:77–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.02.01610.1016/j.compstruct.2017.02.016 ↗
15. González-Cantero JM, Graciani E, López-Romano B, París F (2018) Competing mechanisms in the unfolding failure in composite laminates. Compos Sci Technol 156:223–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.12.02210.1016/j.compscitech.2017.12.022 ↗
16. Li X, Zhou C, Xing C, He A, Yu J, Wang G (2024) A phase-field fracture model for fatigue behavior in fiber-reinforced composites. Int J Mech Sci 269:108989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2024.10898910.1016/j.ijmecsci.2024.108989 ↗
17. Martínez-Pañeda E, del Busto S, Betegón C (2017) Non-local plasticity effects on notch fracture mechanics. Theor Appl Fract Mech 92:276–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2017.09.00710.1016/j.tafmec.2017.09.007 ↗
18. Miehe C, Welschinger F, Hofacker M (2010) Thermodynamically consistent phase-field models of fracture: variational principles and multi-field FE implementations. Int J Numer Methods Eng 83:1273–1311. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.286110.1002/nme.2861 ↗
19. Mitrou A, Arteiro A, Reinoso J, Camanho PP (2023) Modeling fracture of multidirectional thin-ply laminates using an anisotropic phase field formulation at the macro-scale. Int J Solids Struct 273:112221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2023.11222110.1016/j.ijsolstr.2023.112221 ↗
20. Modniks J, Sprniņš E, Andersons J, Becker W (2015) Analysis of the effect of a stress raiser on the strength of a UD flax/epoxy composite in off-axis tension. J Compos Mater 48:1071–1080. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199831452882710.1177/0021998314528827 ↗
21. Navidtehrani Y, Betegón C, Martínez-Pañeda E (2021a) A simple and robust Abaqus implementation of the phase field fracture method. Appl Eng Sci 6:100050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apples.2021.10005010.1016/j.apples.2021.100050 ↗
22. Navidtehrani Y, Betegón C, Martínez-Pañeda E (2021b) A unified abaqus implementation of the phase field fracture method using only a user material subroutine. Materials 14:1913. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1408191310.3390/ma14081913 ↗
23. Pham K, Amor H, Marigo JJ, Maurini C (2011) Gradient damage models and their use to approximate brittle fracture. Int J Damage Mech 20:618–652. https://doi.org/10.1177/105678951038685210.1177/1056789510386852 ↗
24. Pillai U, Triantafyllou SP, Essa Y, de la Escalera FM (2020) An anisotropic cohesive phase field model for quasi-brittle fractures in thin fiber-reinforced composites. Compos Struct 252:112635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11263510.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112635 ↗
25. Quintanas-Corominas A, Reinoso J, Casoni E, Turon A, Mayugo JA (2019) A phase field approach to simulate intralaminar and translaminar fracture in long fiber composite materials. Compos Struct 220:899–911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.02.00710.1016/j.compstruct.2019.02.007 ↗
26. Segurado J, Llorca J (2004) A new three-dimensional interface finite element to simulate fracture in composites. Int J Solids Struct 41:2977–2993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.01.00710.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.01.007 ↗
27. Tada H, Paris PC, Irwin GR (2000) The stress analysis of cracks Handbook. Third Edition ASME Press Doi 10(1115/1):801535
28. Teichtmeister S, Kienle D, Aldakheel F, Keip MA (2017) Phase field modeling of fracture in anisotropic brittle solids. Int J Non-Linear Mech 97:1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2017.06.01810.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2017.06.018 ↗
29. van Dijk NP, Espadas-Escalante JJ, Isaksson P (2020) Strain energy density decompositions in phase-field fracture theories for orthotropy and anisotropy. Int J Solids Struct 196–197:140–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2020.04.02210.1016/j.ijsolstr.2020.04.022 ↗
30. Wu JY (2017) A unified phase-field theory for the mechanics of damage and quasi-brittle failure. J Mech Phys Solids 103:72–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2017.03.01510.1016/j.jmps.2017.03.015 ↗
31. Wu JY, Huang Y (2020) Comprehensive implementations of phase-filed damage models in Abaqus. Theor Appl Fract Mech 106:102440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2019.10244010.1016/j.tafmec.2019.102440 ↗
32. Wu JY, Nguyen VP (2018) A length scale insensitive phase-field damage model for brittle fracture. J Mech Phys Solids 19:20–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2018.06.00610.1016/j.jmps.2018.06.006 ↗
33. Wu JY, Nguyen VP, Zhou H, Huang Y (2020) A variationally consistent phase-field anisotropic damage model for fracture. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 358:112629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2019.11262910.1016/j.cma.2019.112629 ↗
34. Zhang P, Hu X, Bui TQ, Yao W (2019) Phase field modeling of fracture in fiber reinforced composite laminate. Int J Mech Sci 161–162:105008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.07.00710.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.07.007 ↗
35. Zhang S, Jiang W, Tonks MR (2020) A new phase field fracture model for brittle materials that accounts for elastic anisotropy. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 358:112643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2019.11264310.1016/j.cma.2019.112643 ↗
36. Zhang P, Tan S, Hu X, Yao W, Zhuang X (2022) A double-phase field model for multiple failures in composites. Compos Struct 293:115730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11573010.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115730 ↗