Differential compliance from time domain vibration waveform fit and its application to fatigue crack growth rate testing
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The compliance method is widely used to measure crack length during testing of fracture mechanical properties such as fracture toughness and fatigue crack growth rate. Traditionally, the compliance is obtained from the load/deflection records. We present a time domain based differential compliance method, in which the compliance is obtained directly from the vibration waveform of a simple resonance assembly. The compliance computation from time domain signal offers high resolution and low noise providing unprecedented possibilities such as so called “rate-control” testing with fatigue frack growth rate directly controlled by a closed loop system. The differential approach enables to significantly reduce the effect of specimen clamping and material property changes during the test. The method has been utilized in many research project and its gradual development was described in several papers. This, paper, however, for the first time, summarizes and updates all important details of the technique necessary for its implementation as well as the derivation of the used vibrational model. It also describes the advantages and disadvantages of the method and its application potential in testing materials resistance to fatigue crack growth.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. ASTM (2009) Internationa. ASTM Standard D 399-09:Standard Test Method for Linear-Elastic Plane-Strain Fracture Toughness K Ic of
2. ASTM E647-15e1, Standard Test Method for Measurement of Fatigue Crack Growth Rates. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, (2015)
3. Bagherifard S, Kondas J, Monti S, Ćížek J, Perego F, Kovářík O, Lukac F, Gaertner F, Guagliano M (2021) Tailoring cold spray additive manufacturing of steel 316 l for static and cyclic load-bearing applications. Mater Design, 20310.1016/j.matdes.2021.109575 ↗
4. Chondros TG, Dimarogonas AD, Yao J (1998) A continuous cracked beam vibration theory. J Sound Vib 215(1):17–3410.1006/jsvi.1998.1640 ↗
5. Čížek J, Kovářík O, Cupera J, Kondas J, Bajer T, Siska F, Janovska M, Seiner H (2021) Measurement of mechanical and fatigue properties using unified, simple-geometry specimens: cold spray additively manufactured pure metals. Surf Coat Technol, 41210.1016/j.surfcoat.2021.126929 ↗
6. E1820-18ae12019, Standard Test Method for Measurement of Fracture Toughness. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA (2019)
7. Edwards PR, Newman Jr JC (1990) Short-crack growth behaviour in various aircraft materials. Technical Report AGARD-R-767, NASA Langley Research Center
8. Ermi AM, James LA (January 1986) Miniature Center-Cracked-Tension Specimen for Fatigue Crack Growth Testing, pages 261–275. ASTM International100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-295910.1520/STP33009S ↗
9. Fett T (2008) Theo Fett Stress Intensity Factors-T-Stresses-Weight Functions. Tech rep
10. Golub VP, Butseroga VP, Pogrebnyak AD (1995) Study of the kinetics of fatigue cracks by the method of differential compliance. Int Appl Mech 31(12):1018–102510.1007/BF00847262 ↗
11. Hausild P, Siegl J (2009) Vliv expozice v heliu s nečistotami na lomovou houževnatost ocelí a316 a p91. Technical Report v-kmat-767/09
12. He Z, Kotousov A, Branco R (October 2015) Evaluation of fatigue crack front shape for a specimen with finite thickness. In MATEC Web of Conferences, volume 28, page 01004. EDP Sciences10.1051/matecconf/20152801004 ↗
13. IEEE Standard for Digitizing Waveform Recorders. IEEE Std 1057-1994, pages 0_1–, (1994)
14. Kovářík O, Siegl J, Procházka Z (2008) Fatigue behavior of bodies with thermally sprayed metallic and ceramic deposits. J Therm Spray Technol 17(4):525–53210.1007/s11666-008-9205-1 ↗
15. Kovářík O, Haušild P, Čapek J, Medřický J, Siegl J, Mušálek R, Pala Z, Curry N, Björklund S (2016) Resonance bending fatigue testing with simultaneous damping measurement and its application on layered coatings. Int J Fatigue 82:300–30910.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.07.026 ↗
16. Kovářík O, Janca A, Siegl J (2017) Fatigue crack growth rate in miniature specimens using resonance. Int J Fatigue 102:252–26010.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.02.015 ↗
17. Kovářík O, Materna A, Siegl J, Čížek J, Klecka J (2019) Fatigue crack growth in plasma-sprayed refractory materials. J Therm Spray Technol 28(1–2):87–9710.1007/s11666-018-0790-3 ↗
18. Kovářík O, Siegl J, Čížek J, Chraska T, Kondas J (2020) Fracture toughness of cold sprayed pure metals. J Therm Spray Technol 29(1–2):147–15710.1007/s11666-019-00956-z ↗
19. Kovarik O, Cizek J, Klecka J (2023) Fatigue crack growth rate description of RF-plasma-sprayed refractory metals and alloys. Materials 16(4):171310.3390/ma16041713 ↗
20. Kovarik O, Cizek J, Klecka J, Karlik M, Cech J, Kozlik J, Lauschmann H (2023) Tungsten heavy alloys from mixed feedstock by rf plasma. J Therm Spray Technol 32(8):2747–276210.1007/s11666-023-01647-6 ↗
21. Kovářík O, Ćížek J, Klecka J, Karlik M, Čapek J, Siegl J, Chraska T, Takayasu S (2021) Mechanical properties and fatigue crack growth in tungsten deposited by rf-plasma. Surf Coat Technol, 41010.1016/j.surfcoat.2021.126930 ↗
22. Maierhofer J, Kolitsch S, Pippan R, Gänser H-P, Madia M, Zerbst U (2018) The cyclic r-curve - determination, problems, limitations and application. Eng Fract Mech 198:45–6410.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.09.032 ↗
23. Małachowska A, Kovarik O, Sajbura A, Sokolowski P, Lindner T, Scholze M, Karlík M, Čech J, Lampke T (apr 2023) Mechanical and fatigue properties of plasma sprayed (fe0.9co0.1)76mo4(p0.45c0.2b0.2si0.15)20 and fe56.04co13.45nb5.5b25 metallic glasses. Surf Coat Technol 459:12936110.1016/j.surfcoat.2023.129361 ↗
24. Newman Jr JC, Wu XR, Venneri SL, Li CG (1994) Small-crack effects in high-strengthaluminum alloys a nasa/cae cooperative program. Technical Report NASA RP-1309, NASA Langley ResearchCenter
25. Newman JC, Yamada Y, James MA (2011) Back-face strain compliance relation for compact specimens for wide range in crack lengths. Eng Fract Mech 78(15):2707–271110.1016/j.engfracmech.2011.07.001 ↗
26. Newman J, James M, Johnson W (2013) Fatigue crack growth threshold testing of metallic rotorcraft materials. Technical Report ARL-TR-4472, NASA Langley Research Cent
27. Puskar A (2003) Internal friction of materials
28. Ravi Chandran KS, Cao F, Newman JC (2016) Fatigue crack growth in miniature specimens: The equivalence of $$\delta $$k-correlation and that based on the change in net-section strain energy density. Scripta Mater 122:18–2110.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.05.018 ↗
29. Saxena A, Hudak SJ (1978) Review and extension of compliance information for common crack growth specimens. Int J Fract 14(5):453–46810.1007/BF01390468 ↗
30. Seber GAF, Wild CJ (1989) Nonlinear Regression. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics. John Wiley & Sons Inc, Hoboken, NJ, USA10.1002/0471725315 ↗
31. Sun X, Liu G, Liang X, Tong S (2023) Superior comprehensive mechanical properties of a low-carbon medium manganese steel for replacing aisi 4330 steel in the oil and gas industry. Materials 16(2):49010.3390/ma16020490 ↗
32. Tenenbaum M, Pollard H (1985) Ordinary differential equations : an elementary textbook for students of mathematics, engineering, and the sciences. Dover Publ