Phase-field modeling of fracture via homogenization
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract This study presents a novel phase-field modeling approach for brittle fracture that incorporates computational homogenization techniques to characterize the microstructural degradation of the material. Traditional phase-field models often implement degradation and dissipation functions in terms of the phase-field variable that, despite offering satisfactory results, their physical interpretation and their extension to anisotropic fracture behavior is not always clear. To address this challenge, we develop a framework inspired by the nucleation, growth, and coalescence of microstructural voids to model macroscopic fracture. The proposed approach employs homogenization techniques to calculate the effective material properties when introducing voids of varying sizes and shapes. By solving the homogenization problem for different void geometries, we obtain degradation functions that relate the size of microstructural voids to the homogenized constitutive tensor. These degradation functions provide a direct link between microscale damage mechanisms and macroscale fracture behavior. Comparative analyses with conventional AT1 and AT2 models reveal strong correlations between their response and those obtained via homogenization techniques. This relationship highlights the ability of homogenized models to not only replicate established results but also provide a new understanding of the phase-field variable.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Numerical methods in engineering · Composite Material Mechanics · Metal Forming Simulation Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. Alessi R, Marigo JJ, Vidoli S (2014) Gradient damage models coupled with plasticity and nucleation of cohesive cracks. Arch Ration Mech Anal 214:575–615. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00205-014-0763-810.1007/s00205-014-0763-8 ↗
2. Ambati M, Gerasimov T, Lorenzis LD (2015) A review on phase-field models of brittle fracture and a new fast hybrid formulation. Comput Mech 55:383–405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-014-1109-y10.1007/s00466-014-1109-y ↗
3. Ambrosio L, Tortorelli VM (1990) Approximation of functional depending on jumps by elliptic functional via t-convergence. Commun Pure Appl Math 43:999–1036. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpa.316043080510.1002/cpa.3160430805 ↗
4. Amor H, Marigo JJ, Maurini C (2009) Regularized formulation of the variational brittle fracture with unilateral contact: Numerical experiments. J Mech Phys Solids 57:1209–1229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2009.04.01110.1016/j.jmps.2009.04.011 ↗
5. Benzerga AA, Leblond JB (2010) Ductile fracture by void growth to coalescence. In: Aref H, van der Giessen E (eds) Adv Appl Mech. Elsevier, pp 169–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2156(10)44003-X10.1016/S0065-2156(10)44003-X ↗
6. Bharali R, Larsson F, Jänicke R (2021) Computational homogenisation of phase-field fracture. European Journal of Mechanics, A-Solids 88:104247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euromechsol.2021.10424710.1016/j.euromechsol.2021.104247 ↗
7. Borden MJ, Hughes TJ, Landis CM, Anvari A, Lee IJ (2016) A phase-field formulation for fracture in ductile materials: Finite deformation balance law derivation, plastic degradation, and stress triaxiality effects. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 312:130–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2016.09.00510.1016/j.cma.2016.09.005 ↗
8. Bourdin B, Francfort GA, Marigo JJ (2000) Numerical experiments in revisited brittle fracture. J Mech Phys Solids 48:797–826. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5096(99)00028-910.1016/S0022-5096(99)00028-9 ↗
9. da Cruz JP, Oliveira J, Teixeira-Dias F (2009) Asymptotic homogenisation in linear elasticity. part i: Mathematical formulation and finite element modelling. Comput Mater Sci 45(4):1073–1080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2009.02.02510.1016/j.commatsci.2009.02.025 ↗
10. Dijk NP, Espadas-Escalante JJ, Isaksson P (2020) Strain energy density decompositions in phase-field fracture theories for orthotropy and anisotropy. Int J Solids Struct 196–197:140–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2020.04.02210.1016/j.ijsolstr.2020.04.022 ↗
11. Farrell P, Maurini C (2017) Linear and nonlinear solvers for variational phase-field models of brittle fracture. Int J Numer Meth Eng 109:648–667. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.530010.1002/nme.5300 ↗
12. Ferrer Ferre A, Cante J, Hernández J, Oliver J (2017) Two-scale topology optimization in computational material design: An integrated approach. Int J Numer Meth Eng 114(3):232–254. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.574210.1002/nme.5742 ↗
13. Francfort GA, Marigo JJ (1998) Revisiting brittle fracture as an energy minimization problem. J Mech Phys Solids 46:1319–1342. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5096(98)00034-910.1016/S0022-5096(98)00034-9 ↗
14. Gerasimov T, Lorenzis LD (2016) A line search assisted monolithic approach for phase-field computing of brittle fracture. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 312:276–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2015.12.01710.1016/j.cma.2015.12.017 ↗
15. Gerasimov T, Lorenzis LD (2019) On penalization in variational phase-field models of brittle fracture. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 354:990–1026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2019.05.03810.1016/j.cma.2019.05.038 ↗
16. Griffith AA (1921) The phenomena of rupture and flow in solids Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A. Containing Papers Math Phys 221:163–198
17. He B, Schuler L, Newell P (2020) A numerical-homogenization based phase-field fracture modeling of linear elastic heterogeneous porous media. Comput Mater Sci 176:109519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2020.10951910.1016/j.commatsci.2020.109519 ↗
18. Heister T, Wheeler MF, Wick T (2015) A primal-dual active set method and predictor-corrector mesh adaptivity for computing fracture propagation using a phase-field approach. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 290:466–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2015.03.00910.1016/j.cma.2015.03.009 ↗
19. Kopaničáková A, Krause R (2020) A recursive multilevel trust region method with application to fully monolithic phase-field models of brittle fracture. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 360:112720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2019.11272010.1016/j.cma.2019.112720 ↗
20. Lampron O, Therriault D, Lévesque M (2021) An efficient and robust monolithic approach to phase-field quasi-static brittle fracture using a modified newton method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 386:114091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2021.11409110.1016/j.cma.2021.114091 ↗
21. Liu S, Hao S, Shen Y (2024) Asymptotic homogenization for phase field fracture of heterogeneous materials and application to toughening. Compos Struct 339:118134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2024.11813410.1016/j.compstruct.2024.118134 ↗
22. Luo C (2023) Fast staggered schemes for the phase-field model of brittle fracture based on the fixed-stress concept. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 404:115787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2022.11578710.1016/j.cma.2022.115787 ↗
23. Marigo JJ (1985) Modelling of brittle and fatigue damage for elastic material by growth of microvoids. Eng Fract Mech 21(4):861–87410.1016/0013-7944(85)90093-1 ↗
24. McBeck JA, Zhu W, Renard F (2021) The competition between fracture nucleation, propagation, and coalescence in dry and water-saturated crystalline rock. Solid Earth 12:375–387. https://doi.org/10.5194/se-12-375-202110.5194/se-12-375-2021 ↗
25. Miehe C, Welschinger F, Hofacker M (2010) Thermodynamically consistent phase-field models of fracture: Variational principles and multi-field fe implementations. Int J Numer Meth Eng 83:1273–1311. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.286110.1002/nme.2861 ↗
26. Molnár G, Gravouil A (2017) 2d and 3d abaqus implementation of a robust staggered phase-field solution for modeling brittle fracture. Finite Elem Anal Des 130:27–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2017.03.002. (pOINTS OF INTERESTSUMMARY)10.1016/j.finel.2017.03.002 ↗
27. Needleman A, Tvergaard V (1987) An analysis of ductile rupture modes at a crack tip. J Mech Phys Solids 35(2):151–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(87)90034-210.1016/0022-5096(87)90034-2 ↗
28. Nguyen TT, Réthoré J, Yvonnet J, Baietto MC (2017) Multi-phase-field modeling of anisotropic crack propagation for polycrystalline materials. Comput Mech 60:289–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-017-1409-010.1007/s00466-017-1409-0 ↗
29. Otero F, Oller S, Martinez X, Salomón O (2015) Numerical homogenization for composite materials analysis. comparison with other micro mechanical formulations. Compos Struct 122:405–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.11.04110.1016/j.compstruct.2014.11.041 ↗
30. de Souza Neto EA, Feijóo RA (2010) Variational Foundations of Large Strain Multiscale Solid Constitutive Models: Kinematical Formulation. John Wiley and Sons Ltd chap 9:341–378. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527632312.ch910.1002/9783527632312.ch9 ↗
31. Storvik E, Both JW, Sargado JM, Nordbotten JM, Radu FA (2021) An accelerated staggered scheme for variational phase-field models of brittle fracture. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 381:113822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2021.11382210.1016/j.cma.2021.113822 ↗
32. Tipper C (1949) The fracture of metals. Metallurgia 39(231):133–137
33. Wciślik W, Pała R (2021) Some microstructural aspects of ductile fracture of metals. Materials 14(15):4321. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1415432110.3390/ma14154321 ↗
34. Wheeler MF, Wick T, Wollner W (2014) An augmented-lagrangian method for the phase-field approach for pressurized fractures. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 271:69–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2013.12.00510.1016/j.cma.2013.12.005 ↗
35. Wick T (2017) An error-oriented newton/inexact augmented lagrangian approach for fully monolithic phase-field fracture propagation. SIAM J Sci Comput 39(4):B589–B617. https://doi.org/10.1137/16M106387310.1137/16M1063873 ↗
36. Wilson ZA, Landis CM (2016) Phase-field modeling of hydraulic fracture. J Mech Phys Solids 96:264–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2016.07.01910.1016/j.jmps.2016.07.019 ↗
37. Wu JY (2017) A unified phase-field theory for the mechanics of damage and quasi-brittle failure. J Mech Phys Solids 103:72–9910.1016/j.jmps.2017.03.015 ↗
38. Zolesi C, Maurini C (2024) Stability and crack nucleation in variational phase-field models of fracture: effects of length-scales and stress multi-axiality. J Mech Phys Solids 192:10580210.1016/j.jmps.2024.105802 ↗