Fracture characteristics of concrete under biaxial tension–tension loading revealed by a gap tensile test: a numerical study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Rock Mechanics and Modeling · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads · Fire effects on concrete materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. Bažant ZP (1984) Size effect in blunt fracture: concrete, cock, metal. J Eng Mech 110:518–535. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1984)110:4(518)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1984)110:4(518) ↗
2. Bažant ZP, Dönmez AA, Nguyen HT (2022a) Précis of gap test results requiring reappraisal of line crack and phase-field models of fracture mechanics. Eng Struct 250:113285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.11328510.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113285 ↗
3. Bažant ZP, Dönmez AA, Nguyen HT (2022b) How gap tests of ductile and quasibrittle fracture limit applicability of phase-field, XFEM, cohesive, nonlocal and crack-band models? Computational modelling of concrete and concrete structures. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 409–41310.1201/9781003316404-48 ↗
4. Bažant ZP, Nguyen HT, Abdullah Dönmez A (2022c) Critical comparison of phase-field, peridynamics, and crack band model M7 in light of gap test and classical fracture tests. J Appl Mech 89:061008. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.405422110.1115/1.4054221 ↗
5. Bažant ZP, Nguyen HT, Dönmez A (2022d) Reappraisal of phase-field, peridynamics and other fracture models in light of classical fracture tests and new gap test. Computational modelling of concrete and concrete structures. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 3–710.1201/9781003316404-1 ↗
6. Bazant ZP, Kazemi MT (1990) Size effect in fracture of ceramics and its use to determine fracture energy and effective process zone length. J Am Ceram Soc 73:1841–1853. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1151-2916.1990.tb05233.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1990.tb05233.x ↗
7. Bazilevs Y, Behzadinasab M, Foster JT (2022) Simulating concrete failure using the Microplane (M7) constitutive model in correspondence-based peridynamics: validation for classical fracture tests and extension to discrete fracture. J Mech Phys Solids 166:104947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2022.10494710.1016/j.jmps.2022.104947 ↗
8. Brockmann J, Salviato M (2023) The gap test – effects of crack parallel compression on fracture in carbon fiber composites. Composites A 164:107252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2022.10725210.1016/j.compositesa.2022.107252 ↗
9. Caner FC, Bažant ZP (2013a) Microplane model M7 for plain concrete. I: Formulation. J Eng Mech 139:1714–1723. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.000057010.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000570 ↗
10. Caner FC, Bažant ZP (2013b) Microplane Model M7 for Plain Concrete. II: Calibration and Verification. J Eng Mech 139:1724–1735. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.000057110.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000571 ↗
11. Cusatis G, Mencarelli A, Pelessone D, Baylot J (2011a) Lattice Discrete Particle Model (LDPM) for failure behavior of concrete. II: Calibration and validation. Cement Concr Compos 33:891–905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2011.02.01010.1016/j.cemconcomp.2011.02.010 ↗
12. Cusatis G, Pelessone D, Mencarelli A (2011b) Lattice Discrete Particle Model (LDPM) for failure behavior of concrete. I: Theory. Cement Concr Compos 33:881–890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2011.02.01110.1016/j.cemconcomp.2011.02.011 ↗
13. Dönmez AA, Nguyen HT, Xu HL, Bažant ZP (2023) Crack-parallel stress effect on fracture energy of plastic hardening polycrystalline metal identified from gap test scaling. J Mech Phys Solids 173:105222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2023.10522210.1016/j.jmps.2023.105222 ↗
14. Du XL, Jin L (2021) Size Effect in concrete materials and structures. Springer, Singapore10.1007/978-981-33-4943-8 ↗
15. Fett T (2008) Stress Intensity Factors — T-Stresses—Weight Functions. KIT Scientific Publishing, Germany
16. Grassl P, Xenos D, Nyström U et al (2013) CDPM2: A damage-plasticity approach to modelling the failure of concrete. Int J Solids Struct 50:3805–3816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2013.07.00810.1016/j.ijsolstr.2013.07.008 ↗
17. Hillerborg A, Modéer M, Petersson P-E (1976) Analysis of crack formation and crack growth in concrete by means of fracture mechanics and finite elements. Cem Concr Res 6:773–781. https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-8846(76)90007-710.1016/0008-8846(76)90007-7 ↗
18. Hoover CG, Bažant ZP (2014) Universal size-shape effect law based on comprehensive concrete fracture tests. J Eng Mech 140:473–479. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.000062710.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000627 ↗
19. Huang YJ, Yang ZJ, Ren WY et al (2015) 3D meso-scale fracture modelling and validation of concrete based on in-situ X-ray computed tomography images using damage plasticity model. Int J Solids Struct 67–68:340–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.05.00210.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.05.002 ↗
20. Jin L, Li J, Yu W, Du X (2022) Modelling dynamic failure of geometrical-similar concrete subjected to tension-compression loads: Effect of strain rate and lateral stress ratio. Eng Fract Mech 271:108661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.10866110.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.108661 ↗
21. Kim J, Kim DJ, Zi G (2013) Improvement of the biaxial flexure test method for concrete. Cement Concr Compos 37:154–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2012.11.00110.1016/j.cemconcomp.2012.11.001 ↗
22. Li Y, Qing L, Cheng Y et al (2019) A general framework for determining fracture parameters of concrete based on fracture extreme theory. Theoret Appl Fract Mech 103:102259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2019.10225910.1016/j.tafmec.2019.102259 ↗
23. Lyu YH, Pathirage M, Nguyen HT et al (2023) Dissipation mechanisms of crack-parallel stress effects on fracture process zone in concrete. J Mech Phys Solids 181:105439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2023.10543910.1016/j.jmps.2023.105439 ↗
24. Maleki M, Rasoolan I, Khajehdezfuly A, Jivkov AP (2020) On the effect of ITZ thickness in meso-scale models of concrete. Constr Build Mater 258:119639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11963910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119639 ↗
25. Nguyen HT, Pathirage M, Cusatis G, Bažant ZP (2020a) Gap test of crack-parallel stress effect on quasibrittle fracture and its consequences. J Appl Mech 87:071012. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.404721510.1115/1.4047215 ↗
26. Nguyen HT, Pathirage M, Rezaei M et al (2020b) New perspective of fracture mechanics inspired by gap test with crack-parallel compression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 117:14015–14020. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.200564611710.1073/pnas.2005646117 ↗
27. Qing L, Cheng Y (2018) The fracture extreme theory for determining the effective fracture toughness and tensile strength of concrete. Theoret Appl Fract Mech 96:461–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2018.06.00910.1016/j.tafmec.2018.06.009 ↗
28. Reinhardt HW, Cornelissen HAW, Hordijk DA (1986) Tensile tests and failure analysis of concrete. J Struct Eng 112:2462–2477. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1986)112:11(2462)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1986)112:11(2462) ↗
29. Sadouki H, Wittmann FH (1988) On the analysis of the failure process in composite materials by numerical simulation. Mater Sci Eng, A 104:9–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/0025-5416(88)90401-610.1016/0025-5416(88)90401-6 ↗
30. Sherzer GL, Schlangen E, Ye G, Gal AE (2020) Evaluating compressive mechanical LDPM parameters based on an upscaled multiscale approach. Constr Build Mater 251:118912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11891210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118912 ↗
31. Tschegg EK (2009) Biaxial fracture behaviour of steel-span and steel-fibre- reinforced concrete. J Adv Concr Technol 7:229–238. https://doi.org/10.3151/jact.7.22910.3151/jact.7.229 ↗
32. Tschegg EK, Elser M, Stanzl-Tschegg SE (1995) Biaxial fracture tests on concrete — development and experience. Cement Concr Compos 17:57–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/0958-9465(95)95760-W10.1016/0958-9465(95)95760-W ↗
33. Tschegg EK, Schneemayer A, Merta I, Rieder KA (2015a) Energy dissipation capacity of fibre reinforced concrete under biaxial tension–compression load. Part I: Test equipment and work of fracture. Cement Concr Compos 62:195–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2015.07.00210.1016/j.cemconcomp.2015.07.002 ↗
34. Tschegg EK, Schneemayer A, Merta I, Rieder KA (2015b) Energy dissipation capacity of fibre reinforced concrete under biaxial tension–compression load. Part II: Determination of the fracture process zone with the acoustic emission technique. Cement Concr Compos 62:187–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2015.07.00310.1016/j.cemconcomp.2015.07.003 ↗
35. Walraven JC, Reinhardt HW (1981) Theory and experiments on the mechanical behaviour of cracks in plain and reinforced concrete subjected to shear loading. Heron (Delft) 26:1–68
36. Wang Y, Zhang W, Wang J et al (2024) Effects of coarse aggregate size on thickness and micro-properties of ITZ and the mechanical properties of concrete. Cement Concr Compos 154:105777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2024.10577710.1016/j.cemconcomp.2024.105777 ↗
37. Xu SL, Reinhardt HW (1999a) Determination of double-Determination of double-K criterion for crack propagation in quasi-brittle fracture Part I: experimental investigation of crack propagation. Int J Fract 98:111–149. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:101866892998910.1023/A:1018668929989 ↗
38. Xu SL, Reinhardt HW (1999b) Determination of double-K criterion for crack propagation in quasi-brittle fracture, Part II: Analytical evaluating and practical measuring methods for three-point bending notched beams. Int J Fract 98:151–177. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:101874072845810.1023/A:1018740728458 ↗
39. Zhang YH, Chen QQ, Wang ZY et al (2019) 3D mesoscale fracture analysis of concrete under complex loading. Eng Fract Mech 220:106646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.10664610.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.106646 ↗
40. Zhou RX, Lu Y, Wang LG, Chen HM (2021) Mesoscale modelling of size effect on the evolution of fracture process zone in concrete. Eng Fract Mech 245:107559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.10755910.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.107559 ↗
41. Zi G, Oh H, Park S-K (2008) A novel indirect tensile test method to measure the biaxial tensile strength of concretes and other quasibrittle materials. Cem Concr Res 38:751–756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2008.02.00210.1016/j.cemconres.2008.02.002 ↗