Fatigue life prediction method based on polynomial chaotic expansion and Weibull distribution
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Mechanical Failure Analysis and Simulation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. Cao ZC, Zhang WZ (2023) Low cycle fatigue and fatigue-creep interaction effects on softening behavior and life prediction of cast aluminum alloy at elevated temperature. Mater Today Commun 36:106796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.10679610.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.106796 ↗
2. Cao SJ, Zhang HZ, Hu JX et al (2024) Fatigue life prediction model for shot-peened laser powder bed fused 304L steel considering residual stress relaxation and defect distribution. Eng Fail Anal 162:108423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2024.10842310.1016/j.engfailanal.2024.108423 ↗
3. Chen D, Li YZ, Liu K et al (2023) A physics-informed neural network approach to fatigue life prediction using small quantity of samples. Int J Fatigue 166:107270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.10727010.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.107270 ↗
4. Chen YF, Wang XW, Zhang Z et al (2024) An approach to estimate the low cycle fatigue probabilistic curves of PBF-LB/M 316L steel from small size datasets using the remora optimization algorithm. Int J Fatigue 185:108375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2024.10837510.1016/j.ijfatigue.2024.108375 ↗
5. Ding TT, Liu SS, Wang ZJ et al (2024) A novel mixture sampling strategy combining latin hypercube sampling with optimized one factor at a time method: a case study on mixtures of antibiotics and pesticides. J Hazard Mater 461:132568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.13256810.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.132568 ↗
6. Dong XL, Wang DL, Lu JY et al (2024) A wind power forecasting model based on polynomial chaotic expansion and numerical weather prediction. Electric Power Syst Res 227:109983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2023.10998310.1016/j.epsr.2023.109983 ↗
7. Fang J, Li KY, Liu CX et al (2024) A novel two-scale nonlinear damage accumulation model for vibration fatigue life prediction. Int J Non-Linear Mech 166:104796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2024.10476910.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2024.104769 ↗
8. Gan L, Wu H, Zhong Z et al (2023) On the integration of domain knowledge and branching neural network for fatigue life prediction with small samples. Int J Fatigue 172:107648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2023.10764810.1016/j.ijfatigue.2023.107648 ↗
9. Gomes RC, Araújo JA, Cardoso RA et al (2023) Fatigue life prediction using critical distance on aluminum alloy wire containing indentation produced marks. Theoret Appl Fract Mech 128:104135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2023.10413510.1016/j.tafmec.2023.104135 ↗
10. Guo YC, Pan HM, Shen AQ et al (2023) Fracture properties of basalt-fiber-reinforced bridge concrete under dynamic fatigue loading. Structures 56:10501810.1016/j.istruc.2023.105018 ↗
11. Hai LT, Ban HY, Yang XF et al (2023) Low-cycle fatigue behavior of hot-rolled titanium-clad bimetallic steel. Int J Mech Sci 254:108443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2023.10844310.1016/j.ijmecsci.2023.108443 ↗
12. Hu ZY, Hua L, Mei ZY et al (2024) Corrosion fatigue life prediction model for 10CrNiCu shipbuilding steel under authentic marine environments. Case Stud Construct Mater 21:e03787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e0378710.1016/j.cscm.2024.e03787 ↗
13. Hua FL, Liu JH, Pan XM et al (2023) Research on multiaxial fatigue life of notched specimens based on Weibull distribution and Bayes estimation. Int J Fatigue 166:107271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.10727110.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.107271 ↗
14. Hung V, Ramona T, Thanh B et al (2021) Probabilistic method for time-varying reliability analysis of structure via variational bayesian neural network. Structures 34:3703–371510.1016/j.istruc.2021.09.069 ↗
15. Jan H, Jiří B, Petr H et al (2023) Modelling fatigue life prediction of additively manufactured Ti-6Al-4V samples using machine learning approach. Int J Fatigue 169:1074–1083
16. Li W, Cheng LY, Zeng F et al (2023a) High-temperature fatigue life improvement of small-deep holes by using a novel cold expansion process in a nickel-based superalloy. J Manuf Process 106:393–40610.1016/j.jmapro.2023.09.067 ↗
17. Li H, Luo X, Zhang YQ et al (2023b) Viscoelastic fracture mechanics-based fatigue life model in asphalt-filler composite system. Eng Fract Mech 292:10958910.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.109589 ↗
18. Li RH, Li C, Li HN et al (2023c) Improved estimation on seismic behavior of RC column members: a probabilistic method considering dynamic effect and structural parameter uncertainties. Struct Saf 101:1023–102810.1016/j.strusafe.2022.102308 ↗
19. Lian ZH, Li MJ, Lu WC (2022) Fatigue life prediction of aluminum alloy via knowledge-based machine learning. Int J Fatigue 157:106716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.10671610.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.106716 ↗
20. Lindström SB, Moverare J, Xu JH et al (2023) Service-life assessment of aircraft integral structures based on incremental fatigue damage modeling. Int J Fatigue 172:107600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2023.10760010.1016/j.ijfatigue.2023.107600 ↗
21. Liu M, Chen XZ, Yang QS (2016) Characteristics of dynamic pressures on a saddle type roof in various boundary layer flows. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 150:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2015.11.01210.1016/j.jweia.2015.11.012 ↗
22. Liu JH, Hua FL, Zhao H et al (2022) Research on fatigue life evaluation method of shafts based on small sample P-S-N. Int J Press Vessels Pip 199:104773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2022.10477310.1016/j.ijpvp.2022.104773 ↗
23. Liu YK, Fan JL, Zhu G et al (2023) Data-driven approach to very high cycle fatigue life prediction. Eng Fract Mech 292:109630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.10963010.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.109630 ↗
24. Liu JH, Zhang ZY, Zhu LX et al (2023) Research on fatigue life evaluation method of shaft parts based on small sample. Int J Struct Integr 15:709–732. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSI-06-2023-005010.1108/IJSI-06-2023-0050 ↗
25. Mirzaei AH, Haghi P, Shokrieh MM (2024) Prediction of fatigue life of laminated composites by integrating artificial neural network model and non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm. Int J Fatigue 188:108528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2024.10852810.1016/j.ijfatigue.2024.108528 ↗
26. Mohammad A, Khonsari M (2023) On the effect of environmental temperature on fracture fatigue entropy. Int J Fatigue 168:10741110.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.107411 ↗
27. Osterman G, Lesch S, Bradford SA (2024) A conditioned Latin hypercube sampling design methodology for ground-truthing transient EM resistivity models. Comput Geosci 187:105582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2024.10558210.1016/j.cageo.2024.105582 ↗
28. Park SJ (2023) Application of ductile fracture model for the prediction of low cycle fatigue in structural steel. Eng Fract Mech 289:10946910.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.109469 ↗
29. Park JP, Ham J, Mohanty S et al (2023) Statistical analysis of SN type environmental fatigue data of Ni-base alloy welds using weibull distribution. Nucl Eng Technol 55(5):1924–1934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2022.08.00510.1016/j.net.2022.08.005 ↗
30. Pei HQ, Shi LJ, Ma MQ et al (2024) Fatigue fracture mechanism and life assessment for irregular film cooling hole structures in Ni-based single crystal turbine blades. Eng Fract Mech 310:110506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2024.11050610.1016/j.engfracmech.2024.110506 ↗
31. Rosanne JT, Alexander L, Peter DG (2024) Generic E-variables for exact sequential k-sample tests that allow for optional stopping. J Stat Plan Inference 230:106116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspi.2023.10611610.1016/j.jspi.2023.106116 ↗
32. Safar A, Jalali S, Silva L et al (2023) Effects of low cycle impact fatigue on the residual mode II fracture energy of adhesively bonded joints. Int J Adhes Adhes 126:10345510.1016/j.ijadhadh.2023.103455 ↗
33. Shen ZJ, Su YC, Deng JC et al (2024) Investigation of high-cycle fatigue property and fatigue crack propagation behavior of a die-forged 2014 aluminum alloy aircraft wheel. Int J Fatigue 184:108309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2024.10830910.1016/j.ijfatigue.2024.108309 ↗
34. Song HP, Liu J, Zhang H et al (2023) Multi-source data driven fatigue failure analysis and life prediction of pre-corroded aluminum–lithium alloy 2050–T8. Eng Fract Mech 292:109626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.10962610.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.109626 ↗
35. Usabiaga H, Calvente MM, Ramalle M et al (2020) Improving with probabilistic and scale features the Basquin linear and bi-linear fatigue models. Eng Fail Anal 116:104728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.10472810.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.104728 ↗
36. Vasu A, Mei J, Chung J et al (2023) Using Weibull distribution function to determine the design bounds for carburized 4320 steel shafts subjected to bending dominated fatigue loading. Int J Fatigue 168:107447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.10744710.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.107447 ↗
37. Wang JL, Peng WJ, Liu TL et al (2024a) The fatigue behavior of TC17 titanium alloy under different test environments: The effect of saltwater on fatigue failure characteristics and life estimation. Int J Fatigue 187:108461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2024.10846110.1016/j.ijfatigue.2024.108461 ↗
38. Wang JX, Jin CT, Gao S (2024b) Anti-collapse on the fragility and sensitivity analysis of composite frame with CFST columns based on the improved Latin hypercube sampling. Structures 63:106402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2024.10640210.1016/j.istruc.2024.106402 ↗
39. Wu SL, Liu JH, Wang YZ et al (2024) Multiaxial low-cycle fatigue life model for notched specimens considering small sample characteristics. Int J Struct Integr 15(5):948–97310.1108/IJSI-05-2024-0071 ↗
40. Xiao HJ, Song T, Jia BH et al (2022) Uncertainty analysis of MSD crack propagation based on polynomial chaos expansion. Theoret Appl Fract Mech 120:103390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2022.10339010.1016/j.tafmec.2022.103390 ↗
41. Xiao X, Cheng DH, Li HT et al (2024) Microstructure analysis of 7050 aluminum alloy joint fabricated by linear friction weld. Int J Lightweight Mater Manuf 7(4):520–530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlmm.2024.03.00810.1016/j.ijlmm.2024.03.008 ↗
42. Xie LC, Ren SY, Yin F et al (2023) Effects of three stress levels on the fatigue properties and fracture mechanisms of an in-situ synthesized TiB/Ti-6Al-4V titanium matrix composite. Mater Charact 195:11251110.1016/j.matchar.2022.112511 ↗
43. Zhang YJ, Su R, Ma HK et al (2024) Investigation on fatigue performance and residual stress release mechanism of split sleeve cold expansion holes of heterogeneous 7050–T7451 aluminum alloy. J Alloy Compd 1007:176446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2024.17644610.1016/j.jallcom.2024.176446 ↗
44. Zhang ZY, Liu JH, Wu SC et al (2025) Probabilistic fatigue life prediction of small sample properties notched specimens under multiaxial loading. Theoret Appl Fract Mech 136:104836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2024.10483610.1016/j.tafmec.2024.104836 ↗
45. Zhao CY, Wang JJ, He FX et al (2025) A fatigue life prediction method based on multi-signal fusion deep attention residual convolutional neural network. Appl Acoust 235:110646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2025.11064610.1016/j.apacoust.2025.110646 ↗
46. Zheng SK, Shen J, Wang W et al (2023) Multi-twinned deformation and fracture characteristics of directional solidified Ti-45.5Al–5Nb-0.5Ta alloys during high-temperature rotary-bending fatigue process. Mater Sci Eng: A 876:14515710.1016/j.msea.2023.145157 ↗
47. Zhu SP, Liu Q, Peng WW et al (2018) Computational-experimental approaches for fatigue reliability assessment of turbine bladed disks. Int J Mech Sci 142–143:502–51710.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.04.050 ↗
48. Zhu SP, Wu YL, Yi XJ et al (2022) Probabilistic fatigue assessment of notched components under size effect using g eneralized weakest-link model. Int J Fatigue 162:10700510.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.107005 ↗